Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,390
 [70]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
68
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,390
 [50]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [11]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [11]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sachin9
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Last visit: 25 Dec 2015
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 562
Status:Gonna rock this time!!!
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 351
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this.

Prompt: How long did it take Betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

To apply D = RT, we would have to know both the distance and the speed to find the time.

Statement #1: If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 1 and 1/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.

Let D be the distance, and R be her speed. What this is saying is:

D = (1.5R)*2 = 3*R

This implies T = D/R = 3 --- the trip took her 3 hours. Statement #1, by itself, is sufficient.

Statement #2: Betty's average speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.

Well, we know the average speed, but we don't know where Betty lives --- we have no idea of the distance from her home to Denver. Since we know R and don't know D, we can't find T. Statement #2, by itself, is insufficient.

Answer = A

Here's a similar DS question, for more practice:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/927
When you submit your answer to that, the next page will have a complete video explanation.

Does all this make sense? Please let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :)
D = (1.5R)*2 = 3*R

Hi,
Should the above not be D = (2.5R)*2 = 3*R?

doesnt '1.5 times as fast ' imply 2.5R?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sachin9
Hi,
Should the above not be D = (2.5R)*2 = 3*R? Doesn't '1.5 times as fast ' imply 2.5R?
No, it doesn't. This is a very subtle verbal thing.

Suppose I have some beginning speed V.

If I have a speed that is 1.5 time faster than this, that's 1.5*V

BUT, if the speed increases by 1.5 this value, then that's V + 1.5*V = 2.5*V

Moving at a speed 1.5 faster than the original is not the same as increasing your speed by 1.5 times beyond what the original was.

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
Sachin9
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Last visit: 25 Dec 2015
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 562
Status:Gonna rock this time!!!
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 351
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Sachin9
Hi,
Should the above not be D = (2.5R)*2 = 3*R? Doesn't '1.5 times as fast ' imply 2.5R?
No, it doesn't. This is a very subtle verbal thing.

Suppose I have some beginning speed V.

If I have a speed that is 1.5 time faster than this, that's 1.5*V

BUT, if the speed increases by 1.5 this value, then that's V + 1.5*V = 2.5*V

Moving at a speed 1.5 faster than the original is not the same as increasing your speed by 1.5 times beyond what the original was.

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)
Thanks Mike, I suppose this is how it should be

If I have a speed that is 1.5 times faster than this, that's 2.5*V
If I have a speed that is 1.5 times as fast as this, that's 1.5*V

This is how we apply for percentage based concepts..

Is my understanding correct?

Regards,
Sachin
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sachin9
Thanks Mike, I suppose this is how it should be

If I have a speed that is 1.5 times faster than this, that's 2.5*V
If I have a speed that is 1.5 times as fast as this, that's 1.5*V
Is my understanding correct?
Dear Sachin

We are getting into some really subtleties of grammar and phrasing here.

If I have a speed that is 1.5 times as fast as V ----> that clearly should be 1.5*V

If my speed was V, but increased by 1.5 this value ----> that clearly should be 2.5*V

If I have a speed that is 1.5 times faster than V -----> not 100% percent clear, but I would say most people would interpret this as 1.5*V. The GMAT is always crystal clear in its phrasing. There is no way they would use this phrasing and expect you to come up with 2.5*V.

Part of what is unusual about this conversation is we are talking about the increases of speed. Almost everyone compares speed by saying "n times faster." In real life, no one ever talks about percentage increase or decreases for speed.

Let's change the subject to something like profits. You are perfectly correct ---- If I say "profits increased by 150%", that's 2.5 times the original profits.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 574
Own Kudos:
6,801
 [1]
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 574
Kudos: 6,801
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
How long did it take betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1). If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 1 1/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.

(2). Betty's average speed for the trip was
50 miles / hour.

The distance is similar in this question

equation 1 X be speed, t is the time and d is the distance

X*t=d

equation 2

1.5X*2=d >> 3X=d

substitute in 1

x*t=3X

t=3

is this approach correct?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,390
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
alimad
How long did it take betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1). If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 1 1/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.

(2). Betty's average speed for the trip was
50 miles / hour.

The distance is similar in this question

equation 1 X be speed, t is the time and d is the distance

X*t=d

equation 2

1.5X*2=d >> 3X=d

substitute in 1

x*t=3X

t=3

is this approach correct?

Yes, it is. Even without any formula: since moving 1.5 times as fast as the actual speed would take 2 hours to cover the distance, then moving at actual speed would take 2*1.5=3 hours to cover the same distance.
avatar
valsofijanic
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 11 Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 1
Kudos: 4
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer A is sufficient.

it is the same distance - so S1*T1=S2*T2

let us assume that the original speed is x and original time t

x*t=3/2x*2
t=3x/x
t=3

the trip took 3 hours.

The answer B is not sufficient because we only know the speed but not distance.
User avatar
gdediegoi
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
31
 [1]
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Posts: 12
Kudos: 31
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition

How long did it take Betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1) If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 3/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.
(2) Betty's average speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.


(1)
We need to know how long it took Betty to drive, so time=distance/speed.

Let's denote:
s1 is average speed
t1 is the time needed to complete the journey when travelling at speed s1
s2 is the average speed when travelling at faster speed
t2 is the time needed to complete the journey when travelling at speed s2.

Then,
t1=d/s1

But also as per (1):
s1=3/2*s2
or s2=2/3*s1 (equation #1)

And:
t2=d/s2=2hours (from statement 1)

But also as per (eq. #1):
t2= d/s2 = d/((2/3)*s1) = 2 hours --> t2 = (2/3)*(d/s1) = 2 --> (2/3)*t1 = 2 --> t1= 3 hours

Hence,
(1) is SUFFICIENT

(2) Nothing is said about distance between "her home" and Colorado, hence we have no means to determine t or d/s.
(2) IS INSUFFICIENT

ANSWER: A
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How long did it take Betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1) If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 3/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.
(2) Betty's average speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.

You can also use ratios.

1.5 times as fast means that if Betty's speed was 2s actually, 1.5 times would mean 3s. The ratio of actual speed : hypothetical (increased) speed = 2:3
Therefore, ratio of actual time : hypothetical time = 3:2
(because time is inversely proportional to speed)

The hypothetical time has been given to be 2 hrs. So the actual time must be 3 hrs.
User avatar
minwoswoh
Joined: 10 May 2014
Last visit: 17 Nov 2021
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
392
 [3]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 115
Kudos: 392
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Even though you can plug in numbers to solve this question, it is important to notice one important algebraic caveat in this type of problems.

Statement 1 is sufficient. However it provides only 1 equation with 2 variables.
R (1.5) (2) = D

At first glance, it looks like you cannot solve this using the Equation Rule of Sufficiency (the one that states that "you need n number of distinct, linear equations to solve for n variables..."). The catch is that all Distance problems are already giving us 1 equation and 3 variables, namely R * T = D.

So when you look at statement 1 you actually have 2 equations and 3 variables

(1.5) (2) = D/R
T = D/R

If you substitute, you kill one variable and thus you can solve.

(1.5) (2) = T
3 = T


Statement 2 is insufficient.
The equations you have are:
T = D/R
R = 50
3 Variables, 2 Equations --> Insufficient.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
19,393
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,393
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

How long did it take Betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1) If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 3/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.
(2) Betty's average speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.

In the original condition, from vt=d, there are 3 variables(v,t,d) and 1 equation(vt=d), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer. When 1) &2), you can easily find out that C is the answer. However, in 1), you can get 2 equations(time and velocity). That is, use vt=d from (3/2)v*2=d and you can get t=3, which is sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A.


 For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,355
 [3]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,355
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition

How long did it take Betty to drive nonstop on a trip from her home to Denver, Colorado?

(1) If Betty's average speed for the trip had been 3/2 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.
(2) Betty's average speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.

Target question: What was Betty's travel time?

This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question

Let D = The distance driven
Let R = Betty's average speed

Since Time = Distance/Rate, we can rephrase the target question. . .

REPHRASED target question: What is the value of D/R?

Statement 1: If Betty's avg speed for the trip had been 1.5 times as fast, the trip would have taken 2 hours.
The distance is still the same (D), but the rate is 1.5R
So, statement 1 tells us that D/1.5R = 2
Is this enough information to find the value of D/R?
Sure, just take the equation D/1.5R = 2 and multiply both sides by 1.5 to get D/R = 3
Since we're able to answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: Betty's avg speed for the trip was 50 miles per hour.
This tells us that R=50
However, we cannot find the value of D/R, since we don't know the value of D (distance)
So, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

RELATED VIDEO FROM OUR COURSE
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts