Apr 21 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT $84 + an extra $10 off for the first month of EMPOWERgmat access. Train to be ready for Round 3 Deadlines with EMPOWERgmat's Score Booster. Ends April 21st Code: GCENHANCED Apr 22 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips, and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. Save your spot today! Apr 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Apr 23 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, April 23rd at 8 pm ET Apr 24 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join the Live Chat April 24th at 8 am PT. Learn the best strategies for acing the Verbal section. From Sentence Correction tactics to 3 keys for solving Reading Comprehension questions and tips for Critical Reasoning questions. Apr 24 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Maximize Your Potential: 5 Steps to Getting Your Dream MBA Part 3 of 5: Key TestTaking Strategies for GMAT. Wednesday, April 24th at 8 pm ET Apr 25 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join an exclusive workshop for GMAT Club members and learn how to cut your preparation time by 50% and still reach a 700+ on the GMAT. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Apr 27 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Apr 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Learn the best strategies for acing the Verbal section. From Sentence Correction tactics to 3 keys for solving Reading Comprehension questions and tips for Critical Reasoning questions. Video Premiere April 23rd at 8am PT Apr 28 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54401

How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2009, 17:25
Question Stats:
48% (01:30) correct 52% (01:20) wrong based on 324 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year? A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54401

How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2010, 12:18
How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). Among 2 people, probability that none of them was born in a leap is \(\frac{3}{4}*\frac{3}{4}=\frac{9}{16}\). The probability at least one born in leap from these two is \(1 \frac{9}{16}=\frac{7}{16}<\frac{1}{2}\). So, we are looking for such n (# of people), when \(1(\frac{3}{4})^n>\frac{1}{2}\) For \(n=3\) > \(1\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}>\frac{1}{2}\) Thus min 3 people are needed. Answer: C.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 129

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2009, 17:51
The answer is C:3.
Essentially, you need to find the number of people so that the probability of all of them not being from a leap year is LESS THAN 50%. The probability of any one person not being born on a leap year is approximately 3/4.
So you are essentially solving for:
\((\frac{3}{4})^n < \frac{1}{2}\)
n = 1: 3/4 < 1/2? NO n = 2: (3/4)(3/4) = 9 / 16 < 1/2? NO n = 3 (3/4)(3/4)(3/4) = 27 / 64 < 1/2? YES
Therefore the answer is 3.



Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 478
WE: Asset Management (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2012, 06:41
My solution Prob(at least one of them was born in a leap year) > 50% P(A) = 1  P(A') 1  Prob(none were born in a leap year) > 1/2 Prob(none)  1 < 1/2 Prob(none) < 1/2 Assume that there are n people. Prob(none) = (3/4)^n (3/4)^n < 1/2 3^n < (4^n)/2 3^n < (2^2n)/2 3^n < 2^(2n1) If n = 3, 3^3 < 2^5 is true (27 < 32) Thus, The answer is 3
_________________
My Applicant Blog: http://hamm0.wordpress.com/



Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2013
Posts: 5

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2014, 12:00
This is how I would ans .
P(people born in leap year) = 1/4 (because out of every 4 years 1 is a leap year ) P(People not born in leap year ) = 3/4
Now for any n no. of people (3/4)^n is Probability of those people who were not born in leap year
As total probability is 1
1(3/4)^n represents the cumulative probability of all those people born in leap year ( Eg this P includes probability of 1 person in group to be born in leap year to n persons in a group to be born in leap year  which ans at least 1 person is born in leap year )
So 1(3/4)^n>1/2
after trying diff values of n , it comes out as 3



Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 213
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Consumer Products)

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2014, 00:59
Probability of a person to be born in a leap year = 1/4 ... <1/2 Probability of atleast one person out of two to be born in a leap year = 1/4+1/4=1/2 .... not >1/2 Probability of atleast one person out of 3 to be born in a leap year = 1/4+1/4+1/4=3/4..... >1/2
Hence minimum 3 people are required. Ans = C



Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2014
Posts: 146

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 May 2015, 01:54
Bunuel wrote: nitishmahajan wrote: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
I found this question interesting, so thought of sharing it you folks.
Cheers Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). Among 2 people, probability that none of them was born in a leap is \(\frac{3}{4}*\frac{3}{4}=\frac{9}{16}\). The probability at least one born in leap from these two is \(1 \frac{9}{16}=\frac{7}{16}<\frac{1}{2}\). So, we are looking for such n (# of people), when \(1(\frac{3}{4})^n>\frac{1}{2}\) For \(n=3\) > \(1\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}>\frac{1}{2}\) Thus min 3 people are needed. Answer: C. Bunuel how is Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). ??? if you consider years 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 .... Here 1896 and 1904 are the only leap years. How did you generalize probability not being a leap year to be 3/4 ? And also question didn't ask about minimum number of people needed. Ans can be 3 or 4 or 5
_________________
I'm happy, if I make math for you slightly clearer And yes, I like kudos ¯\_(ツ)_/¯



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54401

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 May 2015, 03:48
VenoMftw wrote: Bunuel wrote: nitishmahajan wrote: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
I found this question interesting, so thought of sharing it you folks.
Cheers Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). Among 2 people, probability that none of them was born in a leap is \(\frac{3}{4}*\frac{3}{4}=\frac{9}{16}\). The probability at least one born in leap from these two is \(1 \frac{9}{16}=\frac{7}{16}<\frac{1}{2}\). So, we are looking for such n (# of people), when \(1(\frac{3}{4})^n>\frac{1}{2}\) For \(n=3\) > \(1\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}>\frac{1}{2}\) Thus min 3 people are needed. Answer: C. Bunuel how is Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). ??? if you consider years 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 .... Here 1896 and 1904 are the only leap years. How did you generalize probability not being a leap year to be 3/4 ? And also question didn't ask about minimum number of people needed. Ans can be 3 or 4 or 5 Yes, every 100's year is not leap but for this question it's implied that 1 in 4 years is leap.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 3

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 May 2015, 02:50
If you have 1 person, the chance that he's born in a leap year is \(\frac{1}{4}\) If you have 2 persons the chances are \(\frac{2}{4}\) = 50% We need AT LEAST 50%, so 1 extra person will do the job.
We need 3 persons.
C.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9125
Location: Pune, India

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Aug 2015, 22:54
reto wrote: What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a betterthan50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Keeping it simple: P (A person was born in leap year) = 1/4 This is less than 50%  not the answer P (A or B was born in a leap year) = P (A born in leap year) + P (B born in leap year)  P (Both born in leap year) The two events are independent. Probability that A was born is a leap year is independent of the probability that B was born in a leap year. So P(Both) = P(A)*P(B) P (A or B was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4  (1/4)*(1/4) = 1/2  1/16 This is less than 50% but close  not the answer So when you pick, three people, the probability of someone born in a leap year will be higher than 50%. If you want to calculate it, you can do it as given below: P(A or B or C was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4  1/16  1/16  1/16 + 1/64 = 1/2 + 1/16 + 1/64 (same as the sets concept) This is definitely more than 50%. Answer (C)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1418

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2015, 21:42
Or we can reverse the problem. If the probability someone is born in a leap year is greater than 1/2, then the probability no one was born in a leap year needs to be less than 1/2. If we pick one person, the probability they weren't born in a leap year is 3/4. If we pick two people, the probability both were not born in a leap year is (3/4)(3/4) = (3/4)^2 = 9/16. That's still bigger than 1/2, but if we pick a third person, the probability none of the three people was born in a leap year is (3/4)^3 which is less than 1/2, which means the probability someone was born in a leap year is now greater than 1/2. So the answer is three.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



CEO
Status: GMATINSIGHT Tutor
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2906
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Aug 2015, 00:27
reto wrote: What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a betterthan50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Every 4 consecutive years have 1 Leap year and 3 normal years i.e. Probability of an year to be leap year = 1/4 and Probability of an year to NOT to be leap year = 1/4 Probability of 1 randomly selected year to be NON leap year = (3/4) i.e. Greater than 50%
Probability of 2 randomly selected year to be NON leap year = (3/4)*(3/4) = 9/16 i.e. Greater than 50%Probability of 3 randomly selected year to be NON leap year = (3/4)*(3/4)*(3/4) = 27/64 i.e. Less than 50% i.e. there are more than 50% chances that atleast one of the selected 3 years will be a Leap YearHence  3 Years Answer: option C
_________________
Prosper!!!GMATinsightBhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhihttp://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.htmlACCESS FREE GMAT TESTS HERE:22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION



Manager
Joined: 04 May 2015
Posts: 71
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Operations (Military & Defense)

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2015, 10:21
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: reto wrote: What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a betterthan50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Keeping it simple: P (A person was born in leap year) = 1/4 This is less than 50%  not the answer I understand and follow this partP (A or B was born in a leap year) = P (A born in leap year) + P (B born in leap year)  P (Both born in leap year) Because we are looking for "at least one" shouldn't we be trying to determine P(A, or B, or Both) born in a leap year? I had the same answer as you and had the correct answer but probabilities are a bit of a weakness of mine so trying to work on it. I will show below my working.The two events are independent. Probability that A was born is a leap year is independent of the probability that B was born in a leap year. So P(Both) = P(A)*P(B) P (A or B was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4  (1/4)*(1/4) = 1/2  1/16 This is less than 50% but close  not the answer So when you pick, three people, the probability of someone born in a leap year will be higher than 50%. If you want to calculate it, you can do it as given below: P(A or B or C was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4  1/16  1/16  1/16 + 1/64 = 1/2 + 1/16 + 1/64 (same as the sets concept) This is definitely more than 50%. Answer (C) #If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two are selected the probability that at least one is born in a leap year P(A only, B only, or A & B) = P(A) + P(B) + P(A&B) = (1/4 * 3/4) + (3/4 * 1/4) + (1/4 * 1/4) = 7/16 From here I just made the assumption that 3 people would push it above 50% and selected C. I am just curious of the method that VeritasPrepKarishma used... Maybe there is a Thread or Blog post you could point me to that explains this in more detail. Thanks in advance!
_________________
If you found my post useful, please consider throwing me a Kudos... Every bit helps



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9125
Location: Pune, India

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2015, 21:42
DropBear wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: reto wrote: What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a betterthan50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Keeping it simple: P (A person was born in leap year) = 1/4 This is less than 50%  not the answer I understand and follow this partP (A or B was born in a leap year) = P (A born in leap year) + P (B born in leap year)  P (Both born in leap year) Because we are looking for "at least one" shouldn't we be trying to determine P(A, or B, or Both) born in a leap year? I had the same answer as you and had the correct answer but probabilities are a bit of a weakness of mine so trying to work on it. I will show below my working.The two events are independent. Probability that A was born is a leap year is independent of the probability that B was born in a leap year. So P(Both) = P(A)*P(B) P (A or B was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4  (1/4)*(1/4) = 1/2  1/16 This is less than 50% but close  not the answer So when you pick, three people, the probability of someone born in a leap year will be higher than 50%. If you want to calculate it, you can do it as given below: P(A or B or C was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4  1/16  1/16  1/16 + 1/64 = 1/2 + 1/16 + 1/64 (same as the sets concept) This is definitely more than 50%. Answer (C) #If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two are selected the probability that at least one is born in a leap year P(A only, B only, or A & B) = P(A) + P(B) + P(A&B) = (1/4 * 3/4) + (3/4 * 1/4) + (1/4 * 1/4) = 7/16 From here I just made the assumption that 3 people would push it above 50% and selected C. I am just curious of the method that VeritasPrepKarishma used... Maybe there is a Thread or Blog post you could point me to that explains this in more detail. Thanks in advance! This method is a counterpart of SETS formulas we use. 10 people like A and 20 people like B. 5 like both A and B. So how many people like A or B? n(A or B) = n(A) + n(B)  n(A and B) We subtract n(A and B) because it is counted twice  once in n(A) and another time in n(B). But we want to count it only once so subtract it out once. n(a or B) gives us the number of people who like at least one of A and B. Similarly, we can use this method for probability p(A or B) = p(A) + p(B)  p(A and B) It is exactly the same concept. It gives us the probability that at least one of two people are born in a leap year. When considering p(A), p(B) is to be ignored and when c considering p(B), p(A) is to be ignored. We take care of both when we subtract p(A and B). Similarly, we can use the sets concept for 3 people using the three overlapping sets formula: n(A or B or C) = n(A) + n(B) + n(C)  n(A and B)  n(B and C)  n(C and A) + n(A and B and C) it becomes p(A or B or C) = p(A) + p(B) + p(C)  p(A and B)  p(B and C)  p(C and A) + p(A and B and C)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9125
Location: Pune, India

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2015, 22:01
DropBear wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: reto wrote: What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a betterthan50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 Keeping it simple: P (A person was born in leap year) = 1/4 This is less than 50%  not the answer I understand and follow this partP (A or B was born in a leap year) = P (A born in leap year) + P (B born in leap year)  P (Both born in leap year) Because we are looking for "at least one" shouldn't we be trying to determine P(A, or B, or Both) born in a leap year? I had the same answer as you and had the correct answer but probabilities are a bit of a weakness of mine so trying to work on it. I will show below my working.The two events are independent. Probability that A was born is a leap year is independent of the probability that B was born in a leap year. So P(Both) = P(A)*P(B) P (A or B was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4  (1/4)*(1/4) = 1/2  1/16 This is less than 50% but close  not the answer So when you pick, three people, the probability of someone born in a leap year will be higher than 50%. If you want to calculate it, you can do it as given below: P(A or B or C was born in a leap year) = 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4  1/16  1/16  1/16 + 1/64 = 1/2 + 1/16 + 1/64 (same as the sets concept) This is definitely more than 50%. Answer (C) #If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two are selected the probability that at least one is born in a leap year P(A only, B only, or A & B) = P(A) + P(B) + P(A&B) = (1/4 * 3/4) + (3/4 * 1/4) + (1/4 * 1/4) = 7/16 From here I just made the assumption that 3 people would push it above 50% and selected C. I am just curious of the method that VeritasPrepKarishma used... Maybe there is a Thread or Blog post you could point me to that explains this in more detail. Thanks in advance! Also, check out this blog post: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/01 ... ecouples/Here I have used sets in a combination problem. Conceptually they are all the same.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1107
Location: India

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2015, 03:54
good question. But i doubt whether we can solve like this
#If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two is selected P(A,B born in a leap year) = 2/4
Since we need more than 50% we pickup 3 as it is minimal among others.



CEO
Status: GMATINSIGHT Tutor
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2906
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2015, 04:31
Mechmeera wrote: good question. But i doubt whether we can solve like this
#If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two is selected P(A,B born in a leap year) = 2/4
Since we need more than 50% we pickup 3 as it is minimal among others. Hi Mechmeera, Highlighted step is the wrong step that you have written Because when you select two individuals then one of them can be born in Leap Year and other is not and vise versa as well So Probability of both A and B born in Leap year = (1/4)for A * (1/4)for B = 1/16 But Probability of One of them Born in leap year = (1/4)*(3/4) + (1/4)*(3/4) = 6/16 i.e. Probability that atleast one of A and B born in Leap year = (1/16)+(6/16) = 7/16 which is LESS than 50%But when you follow the same process for 3 people then the probability exceeds 50% I hope it helps!
_________________
Prosper!!!GMATinsightBhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhihttp://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.htmlACCESS FREE GMAT TESTS HERE:22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9125
Location: Pune, India

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2015, 22:08
Mechmeera wrote: good question. But i doubt whether we can solve like this
#If one is selected P(A born in a leap year) = 1/4 or 25% #If two is selected P(A,B born in a leap year) = 2/4
Since we need more than 50% we pickup 3 as it is minimal among others. The thought process is correct but the execution is not. The method I have used is the same as this. When two are selected, the probability that at least one of them has bday in a leap year is 2/4  1/16, not only 2/4. I have explained 'why' here: whatistheminimumnumberofrandomlychosenpeopleneededinordert203018.html#p1559070
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 22

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2018, 22:06
Bunuel wrote: nitishmahajan wrote: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
I found this question interesting, so thought of sharing it you folks.
Cheers Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). Among 2 people, probability that none of them was born in a leap is \(\frac{3}{4}*\frac{3}{4}=\frac{9}{16}\). The probability at least one born in leap from these two is \(1 \frac{9}{16}=\frac{7}{16}<\frac{1}{2}\). So, we are looking for such n (# of people), when \(1(\frac{3}{4})^n>\frac{1}{2}\) For \(n=3\) > \(1\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}>\frac{1}{2}\) Thus min 3 people are needed. Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, What is wrong in the following approach? Cases considered : 1. Born in a leap year 2. Not born in a leap year In that case, the probability of not born in a leap year =1/2 And subsequently, the probability that at least one of them is born in a leap year would turn out to be greater than 50% for 2 people. Please help. Thank you.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54401

Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2018, 22:13
Bakshi121092 wrote: Bunuel wrote: nitishmahajan wrote: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
I found this question interesting, so thought of sharing it you folks.
Cheers Probability of a randomly selected person NOT to be born in a leap year is \(\frac{3}{4}\). Among 2 people, probability that none of them was born in a leap is \(\frac{3}{4}*\frac{3}{4}=\frac{9}{16}\). The probability at least one born in leap from these two is \(1 \frac{9}{16}=\frac{7}{16}<\frac{1}{2}\). So, we are looking for such n (# of people), when \(1(\frac{3}{4})^n>\frac{1}{2}\) For \(n=3\) > \(1\frac{27}{64}=\frac{37}{64}>\frac{1}{2}\) Thus min 3 people are needed. Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, What is wrong in the following approach? Cases considered : 1. Born in a leap year 2. Not born in a leap year In that case, the probability of not born in a leap year =1/2 And subsequently, the probability that at least one of them is born in a leap year would turn out to be greater than 50% for 2 people. Please help. Thank you. Let me ask you: is the probability that you win a lottery 1/2? 1. You win the lottery 2. You won't win the lottery Or: what is the probability to meet a dinosaur on the street? Is it 1/2? Either you meet it or not? 22. Probability For more: ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT ! ! !Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread.
_________________




Re: How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50
[#permalink]
10 Apr 2018, 22:13



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 23 posts ]



