Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
13 Oct 2025, 10:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Persistence Trap: Why GMAT Test-Takers Miss Structural Arguments in Reading Comprehension
Understanding the Core Mistake
When tackling challenging GMAT Reading Comprehension questions, many test-takers fall into what we call the "Persistence Trap" – mistaking temporary surface-level changes for fundamental structural transformations. This error occurs when students focus on apparent modifications or improvements while missing the author's central argument about underlying continuity or persistence of problems.
Consider this scenario: An author discusses how a company implemented diversity training programs and hired more women during a labor shortage, but notes that promotional patterns and pay gaps remained unchanged, and women were quickly relegated to lower positions once the shortage ended. Students who focus on the hiring increase might incorrectly conclude that workplace discrimination was "greatly reduced," missing the author's point that discriminatory structures persisted despite surface-level adjustments.
The Anatomy of the Mistake
This error stems from several cognitive pitfalls:
1. Crisis vs. Structure Confusion
Students often mistake emergency adjustments during crisis periods for permanent structural change. When authors describe temporary measures (like wartime employment changes), test-takers may interpret these as evidence of fundamental transformation rather than exceptional circumstances that reinforced existing patterns.
2. Missing Qualifying Language
Authors frequently use qualifying words like "despite," "nevertheless," "although," and "however" to signal that apparent change actually demonstrates underlying persistence. Students who skim past these crucial markers miss the author's true argument.
3. Surface-Level Reading
The human brain naturally gravitates toward positive change narratives. When students see phrases like "women were permitted to master" new roles or "employers argued in favor of women's employment," they may focus on the apparent progress while missing how these very actions reinforced discriminatory structures.
In the GMAT context, approximately 32% of test-takers fall into this trap on challenging structural persistence questions, often choosing answers that highlight apparent improvements over those that correctly identify underlying continuity.
A Framework for Avoiding the Persistence Trap
The SPAN Framework
S - Signal Words: Identify qualifying language that indicates contrast or persistence
P - Persistence Markers: Look for evidence of underlying structural continuity
A - Apparent Change: Note what seems to change on the surface
N - Net Effect: Determine whether the author argues for fundamental change or structural persistence
Applying SPAN
Step 1 - Signal Words: Scan for words like "despite," "although," "nevertheless," "however," "yet," "still"
Step 2 - Persistence Markers: Identify what the author says remains unchanged or continues
Step 3 - Apparent Change: Note surface-level modifications or temporary adjustments
Step 4 - Net Effect: Ask yourself: "Is the author's main point about change or persistence?"
Simple Example: "Although the company hired more women during the labor shortage, these employees were consistently assigned to lower-paying departments, and most were laid off once the crisis passed."
S: "Although" signals contrast
P: Lower-paying assignments, layoffs after crisis
A: More women hired
N: Structural discrimination persisted despite apparent improvement
Practice Exercises
Exercise 1 (Simple)
"While the new policy allowed employees to work from home, managers continued to favor in-office workers for promotions and important projects."
Question: According to the passage, the new policy was:
(A) successful in creating workplace equality
(B) ineffective at changing promotional patterns
Apply SPAN:
S: "While" indicates contrast
P: Managers still favored in-office workers
A: Work-from-home policy implemented
N: Underlying bias persisted
Answer: (B) - The policy didn't change the fundamental promotional patterns.
Exercise 2 (Complex)
"Despite civil rights legislation that formally prohibited workplace discrimination, many employers continued to use informal networks and subjective criteria for hiring and promotion. These practices, while not explicitly discriminatory, effectively maintained existing demographic patterns in leadership positions. Even companies that celebrated their diversity initiatives found that their executive ranks remained remarkably homogeneous decades after the legislation passed."
Question: The passage suggests that civil rights legislation:
(A) successfully transformed workplace demographics
(B) eliminated formal barriers while informal discrimination persisted
(C) was widely ignored by most employers
(D) created new forms of workplace inequality
Apply SPAN:
S: "Despite" signals that what follows contradicts expectations
P: Informal networks, subjective criteria, homogeneous leadership "decades after"
A: Civil rights legislation, diversity initiatives
N: Discrimination persisted through informal mechanisms
Answer: (B) - Formal barriers were removed, but informal discrimination continued.
Key Takeaways
The Persistence Trap catches test-takers who mistake symptoms for causes, temporary adjustments for permanent change, and surface modifications for structural transformation. By applying the SPAN framework, you can identify when an author's main argument focuses on underlying continuity rather than apparent progress.
Remember: GMAT passages often present complex arguments about how systems persist despite apparent changes. Your job is to understand the author's nuanced position about whether real transformation occurred or whether existing structures adapted while maintaining their essential character.
The most sophisticated GMAT questions test your ability to recognize these subtle but crucial distinctions – distinguishing between what changes and what endures, between surface adjustments and fundamental transformation.
Understanding the Core Mistake
When tackling challenging GMAT Reading Comprehension questions, many test-takers fall into what we call the "Persistence Trap" – mistaking temporary surface-level changes for fundamental structural transformations. This error occurs when students focus on apparent modifications or improvements while missing the author's central argument about underlying continuity or persistence of problems.
Consider this scenario: An author discusses how a company implemented diversity training programs and hired more women during a labor shortage, but notes that promotional patterns and pay gaps remained unchanged, and women were quickly relegated to lower positions once the shortage ended. Students who focus on the hiring increase might incorrectly conclude that workplace discrimination was "greatly reduced," missing the author's point that discriminatory structures persisted despite surface-level adjustments.
The Anatomy of the Mistake
This error stems from several cognitive pitfalls:
1. Crisis vs. Structure Confusion
Students often mistake emergency adjustments during crisis periods for permanent structural change. When authors describe temporary measures (like wartime employment changes), test-takers may interpret these as evidence of fundamental transformation rather than exceptional circumstances that reinforced existing patterns.
2. Missing Qualifying Language
Authors frequently use qualifying words like "despite," "nevertheless," "although," and "however" to signal that apparent change actually demonstrates underlying persistence. Students who skim past these crucial markers miss the author's true argument.
3. Surface-Level Reading
The human brain naturally gravitates toward positive change narratives. When students see phrases like "women were permitted to master" new roles or "employers argued in favor of women's employment," they may focus on the apparent progress while missing how these very actions reinforced discriminatory structures.
In the GMAT context, approximately 32% of test-takers fall into this trap on challenging structural persistence questions, often choosing answers that highlight apparent improvements over those that correctly identify underlying continuity.
A Framework for Avoiding the Persistence Trap
The SPAN Framework
S - Signal Words: Identify qualifying language that indicates contrast or persistence
P - Persistence Markers: Look for evidence of underlying structural continuity
A - Apparent Change: Note what seems to change on the surface
N - Net Effect: Determine whether the author argues for fundamental change or structural persistence
Applying SPAN
Step 1 - Signal Words: Scan for words like "despite," "although," "nevertheless," "however," "yet," "still"
Step 2 - Persistence Markers: Identify what the author says remains unchanged or continues
Step 3 - Apparent Change: Note surface-level modifications or temporary adjustments
Step 4 - Net Effect: Ask yourself: "Is the author's main point about change or persistence?"
Simple Example: "Although the company hired more women during the labor shortage, these employees were consistently assigned to lower-paying departments, and most were laid off once the crisis passed."
S: "Although" signals contrast
P: Lower-paying assignments, layoffs after crisis
A: More women hired
N: Structural discrimination persisted despite apparent improvement
Practice Exercises
Exercise 1 (Simple)
"While the new policy allowed employees to work from home, managers continued to favor in-office workers for promotions and important projects."
Question: According to the passage, the new policy was:
(A) successful in creating workplace equality
(B) ineffective at changing promotional patterns
Apply SPAN:
S: "While" indicates contrast
P: Managers still favored in-office workers
A: Work-from-home policy implemented
N: Underlying bias persisted
Answer: (B) - The policy didn't change the fundamental promotional patterns.
Exercise 2 (Complex)
"Despite civil rights legislation that formally prohibited workplace discrimination, many employers continued to use informal networks and subjective criteria for hiring and promotion. These practices, while not explicitly discriminatory, effectively maintained existing demographic patterns in leadership positions. Even companies that celebrated their diversity initiatives found that their executive ranks remained remarkably homogeneous decades after the legislation passed."
Question: The passage suggests that civil rights legislation:
(A) successfully transformed workplace demographics
(B) eliminated formal barriers while informal discrimination persisted
(C) was widely ignored by most employers
(D) created new forms of workplace inequality
Apply SPAN:
S: "Despite" signals that what follows contradicts expectations
P: Informal networks, subjective criteria, homogeneous leadership "decades after"
A: Civil rights legislation, diversity initiatives
N: Discrimination persisted through informal mechanisms
Answer: (B) - Formal barriers were removed, but informal discrimination continued.
Key Takeaways
The Persistence Trap catches test-takers who mistake symptoms for causes, temporary adjustments for permanent change, and surface modifications for structural transformation. By applying the SPAN framework, you can identify when an author's main argument focuses on underlying continuity rather than apparent progress.
Remember: GMAT passages often present complex arguments about how systems persist despite apparent changes. Your job is to understand the author's nuanced position about whether real transformation occurred or whether existing structures adapted while maintaining their essential character.
The most sophisticated GMAT questions test your ability to recognize these subtle but crucial distinctions – distinguishing between what changes and what endures, between surface adjustments and fundamental transformation.
Moderators:
189 posts
