Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Humans perceive sound as a result of vibrations affecting hair cells within the inner ear. When the hair cells are stimulated, they send signals through nerves to the brain. Loss of these hair cells is a common cause of deafness. Experimental results have shown that treatments designed to cause new hair cells to grow are effective. Therefore, it is now possible to reverse deafness in a number of cases.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
1) Hair cells are regenerated through a process that delivers gene-altering viruses into the ear.
2) Some nonhuman animals continually regenerate hair cells naturally
3) There are other conditions that lead to deafness that have nothing to do with hair cells.
4) Regenerated hair cells were also found to grow new attachments to nerves
5) Additional hair cells in patients who still hearing could lead hearing improvements.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
4) Regenerated hair cells were also found to grow new attachments to nerves
This is the answer that holds up the argument. In order for the new hair cells to work, they must sill be able to stimulate the nerves.
When seen in the light of the assertion that "common cause of deafness is loss of hair cells" and the conclusion that "it is now possible to reverse deafness in a number of cases", I think 4 should not be an option since though the statement describes the role of nerves in hearing process, it does not describe its loss/damage as a fairly probable cause of deafness.
If we take this hair loss as the common cause of deafness (of which a cure would cure deafness in a number of cases) we might find options that specify cures hair loss as fairly appropriate answers.
For example, (1) directly leads to the cure of the hair loss.
(2) gives optimism that we can develop a cure by studying the animals which grow these hair all the time.
(3) doesn't strengthen the argument - it talks abt deafness due to reasons other than hair loss.
(4) talks not about regenerating hair cells, but regenerating producing nerve endings as well. This is fairly attractive option, but less than 1.
(5) doesn't talk abt deafness, but abt hearing improvement - and strengthening the assertion that hair cells are vital to hearing.
When seen in the light of the assertion that "common cause of deafness is loss of hair cells" and the conclusion that "it is now possible to reverse deafness in a number of cases", I think 4 should not be an option since though the statement describes the role of nerves in hearing process, it does not describe its loss/damage as a fairly probable cause of deafness.
If we take this hair loss as the common cause of deafness (of which a cure would cure deafness in a number of cases) we might find options that specify cures hair loss as fairly appropriate answers.
For example, (1) directly leads to the cure of the hair loss. (2) gives optimism that we can develop a cure by studying the animals which grow these hair all the time. (3) doesn't strengthen the argument - it talks abt deafness due to reasons other than hair loss. (4) talks not about regenerating hair cells, but regenerating producing nerve endings as well. This is fairly attractive option, but less than 1. (5) doesn't talk abt deafness, but abt hearing improvement - and strengthening the assertion that hair cells are vital to hearing.
Any other reasoning on this?
Can the OA be posted now please?
Show more
We are trying to strengthen the conclusion and not the premises, so will go with '4'
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.