When seen in the light of the assertion that "common cause of deafness is loss of hair cells" and the conclusion that "it is now possible to reverse deafness in a number of cases", I think 4 should not be an option since though the statement describes the role of nerves in hearing process, it does not describe its loss/damage as a fairly probable cause of deafness.
If we take this hair loss as the common cause of deafness (of which a cure would cure deafness in a number of cases) we might find options that specify cures hair loss as fairly appropriate answers.
For example, (1) directly leads to the cure of the hair loss.
(2) gives optimism that we can develop a cure by studying the animals which grow these hair all the time.
(3) doesn't strengthen the argument - it talks abt deafness due to reasons other than hair loss.
(4) talks not about regenerating hair cells, but regenerating producing nerve endings as well. This is fairly attractive option, but less than 1.
(5) doesn't talk abt deafness, but abt hearing improvement - and strengthening the assertion that hair cells are vital to hearing.
Any other reasoning on this?
Can the OA be posted now please?