It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 17:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I like to run through forests more than I enjoy walking

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 355
I like to run through forests more than I enjoy walking [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2012, 08:40
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

I like to run through forests more than I enjoy walking through crowds .

In the above sentence infinitive ( to run) , gerund ( walking) are not parallel in structure.

I like to run through forests more than I enjoy to walk through crowds .

Is the above sentence correct? If not , please explain
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128
Re: comparisons strategy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2012, 09:47
Dear TomB

It's true there's a parallel-structure problem in the first sentence, but the second sentence is far from correct. Among other things, the verb "enjoy" idiomatically takes the gerund, not the infinitive.
1a) I enjoy watching baseball. (correct)
1b) I enjoy to watch baseball. (awkward and wrong)

Furthermore, we already have the verb "like" --- that single verb is sufficient to cover both terms of the parallel structure --- we don't need a second verb. Here are a couple possible corrections:

2a) I like to run through forests more than to walk through crowds.
2b) I like running through forests more than walking through crowds.
2c) I enjoy running through forests more than walking through crowds.
All three of those are now correct. Notice, while the verb "enjoy" can only take the gerund, the verb "like" can take either the gerund or the infinitive.

These sentences, while correct, are not quite worth of the GMAT because they have an air of colloquialism. They are not formal enough. A more typical GMAT sentence would not be in the first-person and would use somewhat more elevated language.

Unlike Walt Whitman, Henry David Thoreau had far more of a penchant for lingering in the stillness of the forest than for soaking up the energy of a bustling crowd.

Now, that's a GMAT SC type sentence --- historical figures, formal language, comparisons at different levels, and parallel structure.

Does all that make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image


Last edited by mikemcgarry on 20 Aug 2012, 14:25, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 355
Re: comparisons strategy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2012, 12:52
Hi mike

Thank you very much for your explanation

1) Unlike Walt Whitman, Henry David Thoreau had far more of penchant for lingering in the stillness of the forest than for soaking up the energy of a bustling crowd.

In the above sentence

comparison signal : more than.

There is a comparison between 2 prepositional phrases " of penchant in the stillness....." and " for soaking up....". Is that correct

please explain
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4128
Re: comparisons strategy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2012, 14:29
TomB wrote:
Hi mike
Thank you very much for your explanation
1) Unlike Walt Whitman, Henry David Thoreau had far more of a penchant for lingering in the stillness of the forest than for soaking up the energy of a bustling crowd.

In the above sentence, there is a comparison between 2 prepositional phrases " of penchant in the stillness....." and " for soaking up....". Is that correct
please explain

The noun "penchant" idiomatically takes a prepositional phrase beginning with the preposition "for." Therefore, the parallel elements are the two prepositions that begin with "for" ----
(a) for lingering in the stillness of the forest
(b) for soaking up the energy of a bustling crowd
Notice, in both cases, the object of the preposition "for" is a gerund.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Re: comparisons strategy   [#permalink] 20 Aug 2012, 14:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 It is not so much that ventriloquism is enjoying a renaissance as it i hazelnut 2 25 Mar 2017, 23:12
3 For more than five decades, the International Monetary Fund has been i alpham 2 11 Jul 2016, 22:49
I would like to thank whoever it was miliya23 1 20 Jan 2016, 05:29
Planting all these seeds is more involved than I thought. maheshsrini 5 27 Mar 2012, 07:36
22 Experts publish their posts in the topic Authoritative parents are more likely than permissive ankur55 33 20 May 2017, 22:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I like to run through forests more than I enjoy walking

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.