ANBARASI
Good evening sir,
I want the explanation of question 1,2 and 3
Posted from my mobile deviceExplanation
2. Which difference between federal and state governments is the author purposely not addressing in his argument?
Explanation
A. The different ways in which officials are elected.
The author does not purposely avoid addressing this difference. In the passage, the author acknowledges that the federal and state governments are appointed in different ways and considers both of them dependent on the citizens of the United States. The author even mentions reserving the proofs for another place, indicating that further discussion on the appointment modes might be presented elsewhere.
B. The fact that both derive their authority from constituents.
This option is not correct. The passage explicitly addresses this difference and emphasizes that both federal and state governments are agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers and designed for different purposes. The author highlights that the ultimate authority resides in the people alone, regardless of the different governments.
C. The different sizes of their spheres of jurisdiction.
This option is not correct. The passage does not mention or avoid addressing the difference in the sizes of their spheres of jurisdiction. The focus is on the different powers and purposes of the federal and state governments.
D. Their different powers and purposes.
This option is not correct. The passage explicitly states that the federal and state governments are different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers and designed for different purposes. This difference is addressed in the argument.
E. Their different constituents.
This option is not correct. The passage does not mention or avoid addressing the difference in their constituents. The main emphasis is on the people as the ultimate authority, regardless of the different governments.
Answer: A