Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0408:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 03
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
thangduong
Can you pls explain why restating evidence cannot be a valid answer for a strengthen question
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
08 Mar 2011, 21:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
1. restate evidence, a trap used for A and S questions =>possible in strengthen,infer
2. contradict evidence, a trap used for W questions=>i guess you mean counterfact error. this error may appear in incorrect options of almost kinds of question not only weaken
3. affecting conclusion outside context of evidence, a trap used for A, S, W questions.--> out of scope or irrelevant which may trap in most of questions not only Assumption, strengthen or weaken
in OG questions, I do not see these tricks. I guess these tricks are used for 700+ questions. -->as i know the difficulty levels of og12 are arranged ascendent, to see if these tricks mentioned aboved were used or not, you can see the og12 explanations.
to know example of each kine, do searching "restate, contradict evidence " in this forum. For the 3rd kind, see the following example
he get 400 score on gmat. So he can not get in to Havard
a, havard need 600 score minimum
b, 400 score shows a stupid person
B is wrong though B is very attractive. A is correct. the question for above argument is A or S .
we do not need to study these kind of tricks to get 700+. to get 700, we need to understand the argument in 30 seconds. We need very good reading capacity.agree, personally i think the most challenging part of Critical reasoning is how to understand wordy argument and its options as fast as possible. That's the key. In difficulty level, the correct option is often very blur and requires some indirect infer steps while other options are made very tempting
2. contradict evidence, a trap used for W questions=>i guess you mean counterfact error. this error may appear in incorrect options of almost kinds of question not only weaken
3. affecting conclusion outside context of evidence, a trap used for A, S, W questions.--> out of scope or irrelevant which may trap in most of questions not only Assumption, strengthen or weaken
in OG questions, I do not see these tricks. I guess these tricks are used for 700+ questions. -->as i know the difficulty levels of og12 are arranged ascendent, to see if these tricks mentioned aboved were used or not, you can see the og12 explanations.
to know example of each kine, do searching "restate, contradict evidence " in this forum. For the 3rd kind, see the following example
he get 400 score on gmat. So he can not get in to Havard
a, havard need 600 score minimum
b, 400 score shows a stupid person
B is wrong though B is very attractive. A is correct. the question for above argument is A or S .
we do not need to study these kind of tricks to get 700+. to get 700, we need to understand the argument in 30 seconds. We need very good reading capacity.agree, personally i think the most challenging part of Critical reasoning is how to understand wordy argument and its options as fast as possible. That's the key. In difficulty level, the correct option is often very blur and requires some indirect infer steps while other options are made very tempting
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
645 posts
