Vedant41
I was talking about the second solution that we need to find "
picking exactly two grey scarves". For calculating solution for that statement, I used the combinations formula to calculate 3C2 (selecting 2 grey scarves from 3) and & 7C1 (selecting 1 from the remaining 7). Then I multiplied the entire fraction (21/120) by 3. Because I thought that the selected entities from both Grey and other colors, can be arranged in 3 ways (For eg- GGO (O- other scarves), GOG, OGG)
Can you please clarify why this approach is incorrect and during which situations is it correct to consider permutations and multiply with the extra number of arrangements? The key here is maintaining consistency between the numerator and denominator, and understanding what multiplying by 3!/2! actually does.
We multiply 3/10 * 2/9 * 7/8 by 3!/2! because the GGO outcome can occur in 3 different ways:
- GGO (first scarf is grey, second is grey, third is other)
- GOG (first scarf is grey, second is other, third is grey)
- OGG (first scarf is other, second is grey, third is grey)
These are three different scenarios, and we need to account for all of them when calculating the probability.
Alternatively, we could calculate:
P(GGO) + P(GOG) + P(OGG) =
= (3/10 * 2/9 * 7/8) + (3/10 * 7/9 * 2/8) + (7/10 * 3/9 * 2/8)
= (3/10 * 2/9 * 7/8) * 3
Notice that both approaches yield the same result: (3/10 * 2/9 * 7/8) * 3
Now, when using the combinations approach, we calculate 3C2 * 7C1 / 10C3, where the numerator represents the number of different groups of three scarves where 2 are grey and 1 is other, and the denominator represents the total number of ways to select 3 scarves from 10. It's crucial to observe that both the numerator and the denominator give unordered groups of three scarves (meaning XYZ is counted only once, without considering XZY, YXZ, and other arrangements). This maintains consistency between them.
Therefore, multiplying the numerator by 3!/2!, which accounts for arrangements, would break the consistency. In the numerator, you’d have the number of groups of three scarves considering arrangement, while in the denominator, it would still be without it. Thus, multiplying by 3!/2! does not make sense.
Hope that clears things up!