Last visit was: 23 Mar 2025, 14:49 It is currently 23 Mar 2025, 14:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
devinawilliam83
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2013
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
1,589
 [263]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE:Operations (Insurance)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 115
Kudos: 1,589
 [263]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
246
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 March 2025
Posts: 100,038
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,666
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,038
Kudos: 710,225
 [98]
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
76
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 15,826
Own Kudos:
72,254
 [7]
Given Kudos: 461
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,826
Kudos: 72,254
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
devinawilliam83
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2013
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE:Operations (Insurance)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 115
Kudos: 1,589
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So the best strategy is to pick numbers in these ques?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 March 2025
Posts: 100,038
Own Kudos:
710,225
 [6]
Given Kudos: 92,666
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,038
Kudos: 710,225
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devinawilliam83
So the best strategy is to pick numbers in these ques?

Number picking is a good strategy for such kind of questions, though as you can see we proved that I is true with algebra (so to prove that a statement MUST be true you might need an algebraic or logical/conceptual approach).

Generally it really depends on the problem to pick the way of handling it. Check the link in my previous post to see bunch of Must or Could be True Questions solved using different approaches.
User avatar
imhimanshu
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 221
Kudos: 5,717
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Experts,

Can we evaluate the value of rs by below method

Given:
0<r<1 ---(1)
1<s<2 ---(2)

It can be seen that both r and s are positives, hence multiplying r and s will not have any effect on inequality

Hence,
Multiplying 1 and 2
0<rs<2 ---(3)

Am I right in concluding equation (3). Please clarify.

Thanks
User avatar
shameekv
Joined: 29 Aug 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
177
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT 1: 590 Q41 V29
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V20
GPA: 3.5
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V20
Posts: 51
Kudos: 177
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imhimanshu
Hello Experts,

Can we evaluate the value of rs by below method

Given:
0<r<1 ---(1)
1<s<2 ---(2)

It can be seen that both r and s are positives, hence multiplying r and s will not have any effect on inequality

Hence,
Multiplying 1 and 2
0<rs<2 ---(3)

Am I right in concluding equation (3). Please clarify.

Thanks

Though I am not an expert, the answer to your question is Yes,
And, in fact we can solve all the equations in I, II, III by this method.

If 0<r<1 and 1<s<2
then 0<r/s<1 ----- I) True

Again as you suggested 0<rs<2 --- II) Hence False since it can take values more than 1 as well.

For III) multiply r inequality by -1
we get -1 < -r < 0 and 1<s<2
adding the inequalities

0 < s-r < 2 ------ Again this inequality can take value more than 1 hence False..

Consider Kudos if it helped :)
avatar
NYCBS19
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Last visit: 13 Jan 2017
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
20
 [4]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Products:
Posts: 22
Kudos: 20
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Curious if this can be solved this way:

Given: 0<r<1<s<2

1. r/s <1
= r<s (yes)

2. rs<1
= r<1/s (no)

3. s-r<1
= s<r (no)

So only 1 must be true?

Bunuel
If 0 < r < 1 < s < 2, which of the following must be less than 1?
I. r/s
II. rs
III. s - r

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. I and III

Notice that we are asked "which of the following MUST be lees than 1, not COULD be less than 1. For such kind of questions if you can prove that a statement is NOT true for one particular set of numbers, it will mean that this statement is not always true and hence not a correct answer.

Given: \(0 < r < s\) --> divide by \(s\) (we can safely do this since we know that \(s>0\)) --> \(\frac{r}{s}<1\), so I must be true;

II. rs: if \(r=\frac{9}{10}<1\) and \(1<(s=\frac{10}{9})<2\) then \(rs=1\), so this statement is not alway true;

III. s-r: if \(r=0.5<1\) and 1\(<(s=1.5)<2\) then \(s-r=1\), so this statement is not alway true.

Answer: A (I only).

Check our new Must or Could be True Questions to practice more: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=193

Hope it helps.
User avatar
RashedVai
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2024
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
424
 [2]
Given Kudos: 114
Status:wake up with a purpose
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here, you have to think about extreme values like:
r can be 0.001, or 0.999 and
s can be 1.001 or 1.99 etc.
avatar
amirza19
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Last visit: 24 Aug 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Since 0<r<1 and 1<s<2 can we multiply the inequalities to prove (II)?

(1)*(0)<R*S<(1)*(2)

0<RS<2

Thanks
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 20 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,387
Own Kudos:
2,018
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,387
Kudos: 2,018
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since this a MUST be question, we use the constraints to set up cases, disprove the statements and eliminate the answer options.

0 < r < 1 < s < 2.

Let r = ½ and s = \(\frac{3}{2}\).

Clearly, s- r =\( \frac{3}{2}\) – ½ = 1. So, we found a case where s - r is not less than 1. Statement III does not represent an expression that is always less than 1.

Eliminate answer options containing statement III viz., option C and option E.

Let r = \(\frac{3}{5}\) and s = \(\frac{5}{3}\).

Clearly, r * s = \(\frac{3}{5}\) * \(\frac{5}{3}\) = 1. Statement II does not represent an expression that is always less than 1.

Eliminate answer options containing statement II viz., option B and option D.

The answer option left out i.e. option A MUST be true.
The correct answer option is A.
User avatar
sachi-in
Joined: 12 Oct 2023
Last visit: 03 Mar 2025
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
206
 [1]
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 126
Kudos: 206
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The best strategy here is to use limits or approximation for r and s:

r/s will have highest value when r is highest , s is smallest ( and still r will be less than 1 and s greater than 1 ) hence 0 < max( r/s ) < 1

rs max when r max and s max ( r can be a little less than 1, s a little less than 2 ) hence 2 > max( rs ) > 1

s - r max when s max and r min ( r can be little more than 0 , s a little less than 2 ) hence 0 < max(r - s) < 2

Only r/s will be always less than 1
User avatar
Adarsh_24
Joined: 06 Jan 2024
Last visit: 12 Mar 2025
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,016
Posts: 266
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
May be we can do this way too.

1) Split r and s
0<r<1
1<s<2
Or
1> 1/s > 1/2 ( if we take reciprocal sign flips)

Max limits for r* 1/s are 0, 0, 1, 1/2

0< r/s < 1

2)
0<r<1
1<s<2
Limits 0,0,1,2
0<rs<2

3)
0<r<1
-1<-r<0
1<s<2
0<s-r<2
User avatar
Vidhi12
Joined: 28 Jul 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2025
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
0.1<=r<=0.9
&
1.1<=s<=1.9

1)r/s
max value==> 0.9/1.1 <1(maximum value of r and minimum value of s)
min value==> 0.1/1.9 <1
It is less than 1, hence we can say this option is correct, but lets check other possibilities as well

0.9/1.9==> less than 1
0.1<1.1==> less than 1

2)rs
max=0.9*1.9>1
hence this option can directly be called wrong
but lets check other possibilities as well
0.9*1.1<1
0.1*1.1<1
0.1*1.9<1
since there is one value not satisfying the condition , option is wrong


3)s-r
max value=(max value of s - smallest value of r)
1.9-0.1>1
Hence this option is also incorrect

Answer:- A- 1 ONLY

devinawilliam83
If 0 < r < 1 < s < 2. Which of the following must be less than 1.

I. r/s
II. rs
III. s - r

A. I only
B. II Only
C. III Only
D. I and II
E. I and III
Moderators:
Math Expert
100038 posts
PS Forum Moderator
505 posts