Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:19 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
691
 [18]
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
 [18]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,459
 [6]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,459
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
aceacharya
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Last visit: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
81
 [2]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.66
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 48
Kudos: 81
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
2,497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 383
Kudos: 2,497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?
(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers.
(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine.


As per Set theory, we can write -
Total no of Attendees= No of people drinking only Wine+ No of people drinking only BEER - No of people drinking both Wine & Beer + No of people drinking None
320= 200 + Beer only - Both + None
120 = Beer only - Both + None -----(Equation 1)

We need to find the value of NONE
Statement 1- Beer only = None
By using this info & equation 1 we can not find the value of None.
Thus Insufficient

Statement 1- Beer only = Both
By using this info & equation 1 we can find the value of None.
Thus Sufficient

So the answer for this question has to be B.

Hope this detailed explanation will help many.

Fame
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fameatop
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?
(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers.
(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine.


As per Set theory, we can write -
Total no of Attendees= No of people drinking only Wine+ No of people drinking only BEER - No of people drinking both Wine & Beer + No of people drinking None
320= 200 + Beer only - Both + None
120 = Beer only - Both + None -----(Equation 1)

We need to find the value of NONE
Statement 1- Beer only = None
By using this info & equation 1 we can not find the value of None.
Thus Insufficient

Statement 1- Beer only = Both
By using this info & equation 1 we can find the value of None.
Thus Sufficient

So the answer for this question has to be B.

Hope this detailed explanation will help many.

Fame

Your equation is wrong as indicated by red part.....Make sure of it
Correct one is:
Total = Beer dinker + wine drinker - both + Neither
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 383
Kudos: 2,497
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think, I am too tired. Pardon for the mistake
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused becasue of the wording of the first statement. What does non drinker mean? Is it the one who does not drink beer or it is referring to the people who drink neither of the drink.

Interpretation of this statement in different ways gives two different answer....

Someone shed some light....

Regards
Atal Pandit
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 69
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?

{Total} = {Wine} + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
320 = 200 + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
{Neither} = ?

(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers:
{Beer} = {Neither}
120 = {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine:
{Beer} - {Both} = {Both}
{Beer} = 2*{Both}
120 = 2*{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}

120 = {Both} + {Neither}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that 120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both} and 120 = {Both} + {Neither}. We have two unknowns and two linear equation, thus we can solve. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Your solution is awesome..... Could you elaborate the red part?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,459
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
atalpanditgmat
Bunuel
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?

{Total} = {Wine} + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
320 = 200 + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
{Neither} = ?

(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers:
{Beer} = {Neither}
120 = {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine:
{Beer} - {Both} = {Both}
{Beer} = 2*{Both}
120 = 2*{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}

120 = {Both} + {Neither}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that 120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both} and 120 = {Both} + {Neither}. We have two unknowns and two linear equation, thus we can solve. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Your solution is awesome..... Could you elaborate the red part?

The second statement states that {Beer} - {Both} = {Both} thus {Beer} = 2*{Both}. Now, substitute {Beer} = 2*{Both} into 120 = {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither} to get 120 = 2*{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
madzstar
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Last visit: 13 May 2014
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Schools: Duke '16
Schools: Duke '16
Posts: 34
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?

{Total} = {Wine} + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
320 = 200 + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
{Neither} = ?

(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers:
{Beer} = {Neither}
120 = {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine:
{Beer} - {Both} = {Both}
{Beer} = 2*{Both}
120 = 2*{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Both} + {Neither}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that 120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both} and 120 = {Both} + {Neither}. We have two unknowns and two linear equation, thus we can solve. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

could you solve it for me please so i can see how this works out
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,459
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,459
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
madzstar
Bunuel
If 320 people attended the wedding and 200 attendees drank wine, how many attendees drank neither beer nor wine?

{Total} = {Wine} + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
320 = 200 + {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Beer} - {Both} + {Neither}
{Neither} = ?

(1) There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers:
{Beer} = {Neither}
120 = {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine:
{Beer} - {Both} = {Both}
{Beer} = 2*{Both}
120 = 2*{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}
120 = {Both} + {Neither}.
Two unknowns. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that 120 = 2*{Neither} - {Both} and 120 = {Both} + {Neither}. We have two unknowns and two linear equation, thus we can solve. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

could you solve it for me please so i can see how this works out

Sum the equations: 240 = 3*{Neither} --> {Neither} = 80.

Hope it helps.
avatar
cg0588
Joined: 03 Aug 2014
Last visit: 08 Oct 2015
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 14
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel - for Statement (2), it sounds like Beer = Both. Can you explain why this is not true?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,459
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cg0588
Hi Bunuel - for Statement (2), it sounds like Beer = Both. Can you explain why this is not true?

Check here: if-320-people-attended-the-wedding-and-200-attendees-drank-153185.html#p1227863
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
20,169
 [3]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,169
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Presenting the matrix approach to the solution

Question statement

Question statement tells us that total number of attendees are 320 out of which 200 drank wine i.e. the remaining 120 either drank only beer or did not drink at all.



Statement- I

Statement-I tells us that number of attendees who drank beer and number of attendees who did not drink anything were same. Let's assume them as x and populate the rest of the matrix.



We see that we do not get any relation through which we can find the value of x. Hence st-I is insufficient to answer the question

Statement-II

St-II tells us that same number of people drank only beer as both beer and wine. Let's assume the number of people as y and populate the rest of the matrix.



We see that we do not get any relation through which we can find the value of y. Hence st-II is insufficient to answer the question.

Combining Statement- I & II

Considering the matrix of statement-I and using the information given in st-II we get the equation as 120 - x = 2x - 120 which gives us x = 80 i.e number of attendees who drank neither beer nor wine.

Thus combining both the statements is sufficient to answer the question.

Hope this helps :)

Regards
Harsh
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,001
Own Kudos:
6,689
 [2]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 1,001
Kudos: 6,689
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
reto

Hey Harley

Could you explain me why Beer is not equal to "both" as the statement 2 says. I really don't understand why ..... :( "(2) The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine"

Would be awesome :)

Thanks


Hello reto.
In "overlapping sets" tasks you should pay big attention on words 'exactly' and 'only'

Beer drinkers are all people who drink beer and also wine. Some of them drink beer only and some of them both beer and wine.
Statement 2 says that 'beer only' drinkers equal to people who drink wine and beer.

Let's write some facts about this task:

Total people = 320
Beer = 80
Wine 200
Beer and wine = 40
Neither = 80

Beer only = Beer - both = 80 - 40 = 40
Wine only = Wine - both = 200 - 40 = 160

So when statement says that beer equal to neither we can write it as: beer = 80 = neither = 80
and when statement says beer ONLY equal to both we can write it as: beer only = 40 = both = 40
and from this statement we can infer that beer(80) - both(40) = beer only = 40

Does that make sense?
User avatar
Arindamad
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Last visit: 20 Nov 2024
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 25
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Total 320 people are there
200 people drink wine
Let x no. of people drink both wine and beer

Case 1: There were the same number of beer drinkers as nondrinkers.
Let beer drinkers be a and hence non drinkers be a too

Therefore total (200-x)+(a-x)+a=320
=> 2a-2x=120
Not sufficient

Case 2:The same number of people drank only beer as drank both beer and wine.
Taking variables from above
Let the number of people drink both beer and wine and only beer be y

and the number of people who do not drink anything be s

200 - y + y + s = 320
s = 120

Hence B
User avatar
kpstudies
Joined: 29 Oct 2019
Last visit: 22 Apr 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cg0588
Hi Bunuel - for Statement (2), it sounds like Beer = Both. Can you explain why this is not true?


I was hung up on this problem for a long time and asking myself this same question. This post is 5 years old but for those that may be in my shoes and revisiting:

The term "Beer = Both" is meaning "ALL beer" = both. think of "all beer" as one whole circle of a venn diagram. The correct way is to consider those who drank ONLY beer = drank both. So the whole circle of the venn diagram would be ALL that drank Beer = those that ONLY Beer + those that drank Both

so ONLY Beer = Both
ALL Beer = Both + Both, or (2)Both

Plug that in to your equation of
120=ALL Beer - Both + Neither
120=(2)Both - Both + Neither
120= Both + Neither

As you can see. we still can't solve for "both" or "neither".
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,596
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,596
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts