judokan
Guys, I am going through my previous post and found this
try to explain instead on try numbers.
Given b > a, we have to prove whether b + c > a, which is always true if c > or = 0.
(1) + (2)
c > a
abc > 0
Three possible situations:
Case(1):
a, b , c are all + ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0
Case (2):
b is +ve 0, c and a are -ve
since c > a, lcl < lal
then b - lcl > a (for all b > 0 and c > a and c, a are -ve)
So, the statement is true.
Case (3):
c is +ve 0, b and a are -ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0
So, ans is C
nice approach. but thanks to your approach, i just figured out a really cool way to approach this. Check this out:
If a, b, and c are integers such that b>a, is b+c>a?
(1) c>a
(2) abc>0
First of all, the question says that b>a, so (b-a) > 0, which is positive. The inequality b+c>a can be turned into (b-a)+c>0. The question is asking whether the sum of these variables are positive. For this to be true, we have to see whether c is positive or zero.
(1) both the variables could be positive or negatives
(2) c could be positive or negative
(1&2) because both b and c are greater than a, a will definitely be at least negative because you can't expect a to be positive and then consider the possibility for it to be bigger than either b or c, both of which could be negative....agree? We know that if all of the variables are positive, the answer will be true to our given inequality, but what if only 2 of the variables are negative? so:
if b is positive:from statement 1, we know that c>a, which means (c-a) > 0, which is positive. So the inequality b+c>a can be rearranged to: b + (c-a) >0, which is positive because we've consider b to be positive ----->true
if c is positive (which we already know that it make the inequality hold true anyways, but for the sake of practice, will illustrate it anyways):we know from the question that b>a, which means (b-a) > 0, which is positive. So the inequality b+c>a can be rearranged to: (b-a) + c > 0, which is positive because we've considered c to be positive----->true.
So the answer is C!!!
Note: when you sit for the real test, you can actually skip the scenario of c being positive because we already know from the given question that if c is positive, then the overall inequality will hold true

. so you're required to check ONLY the scenario of b being positive

what can we learn from this problem? a difficult question such as this one would try to confuse you by dragging you to consider the different negative possibilities which can be time consuming. This question can be A LOT easier when you isolate only one of the three variables as negative, and then consider the different scenarios of the remaining 2 variables as POSITIVE because that would automatically take care of the negative possibilities by themselves. However, the question has indirectly given us the clue that the inequality will hold true for one of the remaining variables being positive, and i'm talking about c. So you only have to check what will happen if ONLY b is positive.