Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:53 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 963
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nmohindru
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Last visit: 06 Jul 2013
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 157
Kudos: 488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mbawaters
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Posts: 145
Kudos: 359
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) b>a; c>a; Is b+c>a?
{a,b,c} = {-2,1,-1} works
= {-3,-2,-2} does not work

2) {a,b,c}={-2,1,-5} does not work
{1,2,3} works
No, I don't think they are just asking us to check whether C is +ve or -ve!
I believe answer is C.
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guys, I know that "if I pick numbers..." then I can do this and that.....I'm asking for the algebraic approach rather than the picking number approach.

OA will be displaced once the algebraic approach is displayed. This will be better for all of us.
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jallenmorris
Rather than subtracting out c>a, I would add c>a to b>a
you mean subtracting out the b>c, right??
this gives you b+c>2a

#1 should be sufficient. We already know that b>a. If c>a, then 2 numbers larger than a must have a sum larger than a, even if c is negative. Try picking some numbers.

b = 3, a = -2 c = -1
3 + -1 > -2 True.

b = 1, a = -1 c = 0
1 + 0 > -1

I don't believe #2 is sufficient.

tarek99
If a, b, and c are integers such that b>a, is b+c>a?

(1) c>a

(2) abc>0


I know that this can be solved by experimenting with different numbers, but I honestly hate this approach because my mind just turns nuts and even more confused. More importantly, experimenting will make you waste time by doing the same approach multiple times until you reach your desired answer. I prefer the algebraic approach because you have to do the approach only once and then there you have your result. So would anyone please show me how to approach this problem using strictly algebra?? Here is what I did so far:

b+c>a
- b>a
c>0, so what the question is really asking is whether C is positive

(1) we don't know whether both are positive or negative

(2) either all the variables are positive or only 2 of the variables are negative, which C can be one of them

(1&2) Together, when we look at the worst case scenario that 2 variables are negative for abc>0, and when taking b>a and c>a into consideration, since a is smaller than both b and c, we know that a must be at least negative. However, what algebraic approach can we do to determine whether c or b is positive?



we do have to subtract the b>a from b+c>a because these are the information given in the question. We have to first manipulate what we already have and then use is to justify every statement.
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no input? The OA is C.
User avatar
judokan
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Last visit: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
Posts: 203
Kudos: 243
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If a, b, and c are integers such that b>a, is b+c>a?

(1) c>a

(2) abc>0

(1) Given b > a and c > a
so, b + c > a + a = 2a > a
So (1) is sufficient.

(2) only tells me that the sign of the three integter is either 3 + , or 1 + and 2 -

Not sufficient

So (A)
User avatar
rao
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Last visit: 06 Oct 2011
Posts: 473
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 473
Kudos: 320
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarek99
OA is C


I am still not convinced. Do you agree A is suff by airthmatic?
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No because we don't know whether both c and a are positives. It is also possible that both c and a are negatives, for example:

c= -2

a= -3

so, c>a is the same as -2>-3


I'm trying to avoid using plug ins, but I had to use number here just to explain to you why statement 1 is not sufficient, because we don't know whether both c & a are positives, or both negatives, or even whether c is positive and a is negative. see what I mean?? c can be bigger than a in all these 3 different scenarios.
User avatar
bigfernhead
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 518
Kudos: 2,090
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is it me? but it looks like {-3,-2,-2} does work indeed?

mbawaters
1) b>a; c>a; Is b+c>a?
{a,b,c} = {-2,1,-1} works
= {-3,-2,-2} does not work

2) {a,b,c}={-2,1,-5} does not work
{1,2,3} works
No, I don't think they are just asking us to check whether C is +ve or -ve!
I believe answer is C.
User avatar
haidzz
Joined: 20 Jul 2008
Last visit: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 844
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
so the algebraic approach is not going to work with this type of problems? :(
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,576
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,576
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i am getting C we need to know if C>a

we are told abc>0

suppose a<0 C<0 b>0

c=-4 a-5 b=1

1-4=-3>-5

suppose b<0 C>0 a<0
b=-2 a=-3 c=1

-2+1=-1>-3
User avatar
judokan
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Last visit: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
Posts: 203
Kudos: 243
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys, I am going through my previous post and found this

try to explain instead on try numbers.
Given b > a, we have to prove whether b + c > a, which is always true if c > or = 0.

(1) + (2)
c > a
abc > 0

Three possible situations:
Case(1):
a, b , c are all + ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0

Case (2):
b is +ve 0, c and a are -ve
since c > a, lcl < lal
then b - lcl > a (for all b > 0 and c > a and c, a are -ve)
So, the statement is true.

Case (3):
c is +ve 0, b and a are -ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0

So, ans is C
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
judokan
Guys, I am going through my previous post and found this

try to explain instead on try numbers.
Given b > a, we have to prove whether b + c > a, which is always true if c > or = 0.

(1) + (2)
c > a
abc > 0

Three possible situations:
Case(1):
a, b , c are all + ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0

Case (2):
b is +ve 0, c and a are -ve
since c > a, lcl < lal
then b - lcl > a (for all b > 0 and c > a and c, a are -ve)
So, the statement is true.

Case (3):
c is +ve 0, b and a are -ve
the statement b + c > a is always true, because c > 0

So, ans is C


nice approach. but thanks to your approach, i just figured out a really cool way to approach this. Check this out:

If a, b, and c are integers such that b>a, is b+c>a?

(1) c>a

(2) abc>0


First of all, the question says that b>a, so (b-a) > 0, which is positive. The inequality b+c>a can be turned into (b-a)+c>0. The question is asking whether the sum of these variables are positive. For this to be true, we have to see whether c is positive or zero.

(1) both the variables could be positive or negatives
(2) c could be positive or negative

(1&2) because both b and c are greater than a, a will definitely be at least negative because you can't expect a to be positive and then consider the possibility for it to be bigger than either b or c, both of which could be negative....agree? We know that if all of the variables are positive, the answer will be true to our given inequality, but what if only 2 of the variables are negative? so:

if b is positive:

from statement 1, we know that c>a, which means (c-a) > 0, which is positive. So the inequality b+c>a can be rearranged to: b + (c-a) >0, which is positive because we've consider b to be positive ----->true

if c is positive (which we already know that it make the inequality hold true anyways, but for the sake of practice, will illustrate it anyways):

we know from the question that b>a, which means (b-a) > 0, which is positive. So the inequality b+c>a can be rearranged to: (b-a) + c > 0, which is positive because we've considered c to be positive----->true.

So the answer is C!!! :)

Note: when you sit for the real test, you can actually skip the scenario of c being positive because we already know from the given question that if c is positive, then the overall inequality will hold true ;). so you're required to check ONLY the scenario of b being positive ;)

what can we learn from this problem? a difficult question such as this one would try to confuse you by dragging you to consider the different negative possibilities which can be time consuming. This question can be A LOT easier when you isolate only one of the three variables as negative, and then consider the different scenarios of the remaining 2 variables as POSITIVE because that would automatically take care of the negative possibilities by themselves. However, the question has indirectly given us the clue that the inequality will hold true for one of the remaining variables being positive, and i'm talking about c. So you only have to check what will happen if ONLY b is positive.
User avatar
lsmv479
Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Last visit: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You should try to think about these problems visually using a number line. Doing that I came up with some numbers that seem to indicate the answer is E

a= -10, b= -9, c = -8. b+c>a? No

a= -10, b= -9, c= 2. b+c>a? Yes

Edit: oops, as someone pointed out my first set of numbers doesn't work out. Don't know what I was thinking there. It's difficult to do this problem algebraically because you really have to see visually what's going on. Sometimes plugging in numbers makes a problem more concrete so you can then proceed to the more abstract algebraic approach but it's best to use as little math as possible when doing GMAT problems so if you can do it visually that's the best approach. On the other hand sometimes a little plugging in and algebra is what it takes to visualize the problem.
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 621
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 621
Kudos: 2,157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lsmv479
You should try to think about these problems visually using a number line. Doing that I came up with some numbers that seem to indicate the answer is E

a= -10, b= -9, c = -8. b+c>a? No

a= -10, b= -9, c= 2. b+c>a? Yes


abc > 0 . Your first set of numbers does not satisfy that ( if you were posting that C is incorrect )

IMO, Its never easy to pick numbers or algebra for any problem. I believe it comes down to personal preference

I try to solve it algebraically in the first 30 sec or so. If I dont get any where I look for numbers. But this approach has been a little bit time consuming. I guess over a period of time practice will pay off
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lsmv479
You should try to think about these problems visually using a number line. Doing that I came up with some numbers that seem to indicate the answer is E

a= -10, b= -9, c = -8. b+c>a? No

a= -10, b= -9, c= 2. b+c>a? Yes

Edit: oops, as someone pointed out my first set of numbers doesn't work out. Don't know what I was thinking there. It's difficult to do this problem algebraically because you really have to see visually what's going on. Sometimes plugging in numbers makes a problem more concrete so you can then proceed to the more abstract algebraic approach but it's best to use as little math as possible when doing GMAT problems so if you can do it visually that's the best approach. On the other hand sometimes a little plugging in and algebra is what it takes to visualize the problem.

well, take a look at my last post, which is right before yours. I made a long post, but it's a very detailed one. I think that should make things a lot clearer for you.
have a look at it.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105378 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts