May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41 GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3

If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2014, 02:43
Question Stats:
42% (02:10) correct 58% (02:17) wrong based on 93 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a]+[b]=1? (1) ab=2. (2) 0<a<b<2. Source: GCT M2856
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/howtoscore750and750imovedfrom710to189016.html



Intern
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Posts: 9

Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2014, 03:45
Nice question!
[a]+[b]=1 can happen if one value is negative and one positive OR if one value is 0 and the other is 1.
A  ab = 2 if both a and b are negative  then [a]+[b]=1 is not possible
If a and b are positive  can it result in one value being 0 (i.e. 0<a<1) and the other 0 (1<b<2) This is impossible as if 1<b<2 then it has to be multiplied by a number larger than 1 to give 2. But if a is larger than one then [a]+[b]=2.
So if ab=2 then it cannot happen that [a]+[b]=1 and A is SUFFICIENT
B  0<a<b<2 If 0<a<1 and 1<b<2 then [a]+[b]=1 is true if 0<a<1 and a<b<1 then [a]+[b]=1 is not true
So we cannot conclude and B is NOT SUFFICIENT



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228

If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2014, 03:54
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ... (1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign. If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out. If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out. We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient. (2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient. Answer: A. THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205389
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41 GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3

If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2014, 03:31
Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ... (1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign. If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out. If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out. We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient. (2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient. Answer: A. THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205389 I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3 what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2 In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)
_________________
Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/howtoscore750and750imovedfrom710to189016.html



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228

Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2014, 04:46
honchos wrote: Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ... (1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign. If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out. If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out. We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient. (2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient. Answer: A. THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205389 I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3 what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2 In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414) Are you talking about statement 1 or 2? Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote...
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41 GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3

Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2014, 05:00
Bunuel wrote: honchos wrote: Bunuel wrote: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ... (1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign. If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out. If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out. We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient. (2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient. Answer: A. THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205389 I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3 what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2 In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414) Are you talking about statement 1 or 2? Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote... I was actually about statement 1, your inequality has left the possibility that a can be equal to 1 and b can be equal to 2. Though the result will still remain the same.
_________________
Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/howtoscore750and750imovedfrom710to189016.html



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228

Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2014, 05:10
honchos wrote: Bunuel wrote: honchos wrote: I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3
what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2
In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)
Are you talking about statement 1 or 2? Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote... I was actually about statement 1, your inequality has left the possibility that a can be equal to 1 and b can be equal to 2. Though the result will still remain the same. Dear honchos, please read carefully what I wrote. For [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). So, for [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, b CANNOT BE 2!
_________________



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10980

Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Mar 2018, 02:14
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any nu
[#permalink]
13 Mar 2018, 02:14






