Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 08:39 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 08:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
honchos
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Last visit: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
2,489
 [30]
Given Kudos: 298
Status:Verbal Forum Moderator
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
Posts: 358
Kudos: 2,489
 [30]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
26
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
JohanH
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Last visit: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
24
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 6
Kudos: 24
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,827
Own Kudos:
811,213
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,827
Kudos: 811,213
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
honchos
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Last visit: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 298
Status:Verbal Forum Moderator
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
Posts: 358
Kudos: 2,489
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?

Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-2, ...

(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.

If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is -2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.

If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or vise-versa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or vise-versa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.

We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: new-set-number-properties-149775-60.html#p1205389


I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3

what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2

In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,827
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,827
Kudos: 811,213
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
honchos
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?

Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-2, ...

(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.

If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is -2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.

If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or vise-versa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or vise-versa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.

We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: new-set-number-properties-149775-60.html#p1205389


I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3

what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2

In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)

Are you talking about statement 1 or 2?

Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote...
User avatar
honchos
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Last visit: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 298
Status:Verbal Forum Moderator
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
Posts: 358
Kudos: 2,489
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
honchos
Bunuel
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?

Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [-1.5]=-2, ...

(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.

If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is -2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.

If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or vise-versa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or vise-versa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.

We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

THIS QUESTION IS DISCUSSED HERE: new-set-number-properties-149775-60.html#p1205389


I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3

what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2

In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)

Are you talking about statement 1 or 2?

Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote...


I was actually about statement 1, your inequality has left the possibility that a can be equal to 1 and b can be equal to 2. Though the result will still remain the same.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,827
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,827
Kudos: 811,213
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
honchos
Bunuel
honchos


I think Bunuel you missed something for statement 2 what if a=1 and b=2 in this case ab =2 and [a] + [b] =3

what if X IS ROOT of 2, root of 2 X root of 2 = 2

In that case [a] + [b] = 2 (a=b = 1.414)

Are you talking about statement 1 or 2?

Since you are using ab = 2 there, then I guess you are talking about statement 1. Still not clear what are you trying to say... I got that [a] + [b] cannot equal to 1, which means that we have a NO answer to the question (so statement 1 is sufficient). In your examples [a] + [b] also does not equal to 1. So, they do not contradict what I wrote...


I was actually about statement 1, your inequality has left the possibility that a can be equal to 1 and b can be equal to 2. Though the result will still remain the same.

Dear honchos, please read carefully what I wrote. For [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or vise-versa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or vise-versa). So, for [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, b CANNOT BE 2!
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,985
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,985
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109827 posts
498 posts
212 posts