Last visit was: 03 Dec 2024, 09:42 It is currently 03 Dec 2024, 09:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Multiples and Factors|                     
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,505
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,505
Kudos: 682,768
 [56]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,505
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,505
Kudos: 682,768
 [24]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
amz14
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Last visit: 10 Dec 2017
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
30
 [11]
Given Kudos: 188
Schools: LBS '17
Schools: LBS '17
Posts: 19
Kudos: 30
 [11]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 03 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,298
Own Kudos:
1,838
 [2]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,298
Kudos: 1,838
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning starts at 10:56:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
General Discussion
User avatar
VeritasPrepBill
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 05 Feb 2014
Last visit: 16 Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V50
GPA: 3.2
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V50
Posts: 4
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From Statement 1, 2k must be even, so we also know that n is odd because 2k + 3 must be odd. n could be any odd multiple of 7 (21, 35, etc.), but it could also be an odd number that is not a multiple of 7 (like 11). Insufficient.

From Statement 2, there is nothing about n, so it is clearly insufficient.

Combined, 2k - 4 is a multiple of 7, so 2k + 3 (which is equal to n) must also be a multiple, since (2k - 4) + 7 = 2k + 3. Sufficient.
User avatar
AndyNeedsGMAT
Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V32
Products:
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V32
Posts: 29
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
SOLUTION

If k and n are integers, is n divisible by 7?

(1) n-3 = 2k --> \(n=2k+3\), now if \(k=1\) then \(n=5\) and the answer is NO but if \(k=2\) then \(n=7\) and the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) 2k -4 is divisible by 7 --> \(2k-4=7q\), for some integer \(q\) --> \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\). Clearly insufficient as no info about n.

(1)+(2) Since from (2) \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\) then from (1) \(n=2k+3=2*\frac{7q+4}{2}+3=7q+4+3=7(q+1)\) --> \(n\) is a multiple of 7. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


As in the st.1 , can we work with smart numbers in the Stmt. 2 and the combined one (1 + 2 ) . Please help.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,505
Own Kudos:
682,768
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,505
Kudos: 682,768
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ani781
Bunuel
SOLUTION

If k and n are integers, is n divisible by 7?

(1) n-3 = 2k --> \(n=2k+3\), now if \(k=1\) then \(n=5\) and the answer is NO but if \(k=2\) then \(n=7\) and the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) 2k -4 is divisible by 7 --> \(2k-4=7q\), for some integer \(q\) --> \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\). Clearly insufficient as no info about n.

(1)+(2) Since from (2) \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\) then from (1) \(n=2k+3=2*\frac{7q+4}{2}+3=7q+4+3=7(q+1)\) --> \(n\) is a multiple of 7. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


As in the st.1 , can we work with smart numbers in the Stmt. 2 and the combined one (1 + 2 ) . Please help.

For (2) we cannot use plugging because no info is given about n. When we combine we get that n = 7q + 7. You can plug-in integer values for q there to see that all of them will give n which is in fact divisible by 7.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,808
Own Kudos:
12,031
 [4]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,808
Kudos: 12,031
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

DS questions are often built around patterns. To get to the correct answer, you don't necessarily have to be great at math....if you can do enough work to prove that a pattern exists (and you can prove whether there's a pattern or not by TESTing VALUES).

Here, we're told that N and K are INTEGERS. We're asked if N is divisible by 7. This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: N - 3 = 2K

IF....
K = 1, then N = 5 and the answer to the question is NO.
K = 2, then N = 7 and the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: (2K - 4) is divisible by 7

This tells us NOTHING about N.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know:
N-3 = 2K
This first fact tells us that N MUST be ODD. Beyond our initial TESTs (that hint at this), there's a Number Property pattern here.....2(K) = EVEN, so 2K + 3 = ODD. N = 2K + 3, so N must be ODD.

(2K - 4) is divisible by 7

IF....
(2K-4) = 7 then K = 5.5 (this is NOT allowed though, since K MUST be an INTEGER).
(2K-4) = 14 then K = 9
(2K-4) = 21 then K = 12.5 (not allowed)
(2K-4) = 28 then K = 16

Notice from this pattern that K increases by 3.5 each time. We can use THIS pattern to quickly map out other possible values of K that are integers....

K COULD be...9, 16, 23, 30, 37, etc......

Using these values of K and the information in Fact 1....
IF....
K = 9, then N = 21 and the answer to the question is YES
K = 16, then N = 35 and the answer to the question is YES
K = 23, then N = 49 and the answer to the question is YES

Notice how N keeps increasing by 14 (and is always a multiple of 7)? This is another pattern.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
fiel9882
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Last visit: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What if I just noticed since 1) says 2K+3 and 2) says 2K-4 they have a difference of 7? Is that sufficient enough?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,808
Own Kudos:
12,031
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,808
Kudos: 12,031
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi fiel9882,

You've caught one of the hidden patterns in this question. From Fact 2, we know that (2K-4) is divisible by 7, which means that it's a multiple of 7. Adding or subtracting any other multiple of 7 to (2K-4) will give you a new number that is ALSO divisible by 7.

So... (2K-4) + 7 = 2K+3.... so that term must also be a multiple of 7.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
mysteriouswoman
Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Last visit: 09 Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
SOLUTION

If k and n are integers, is n divisible by 7?

(1) n-3 = 2k --> \(n=2k+3\), now if \(k=1\) then \(n=5\) and the answer is NO but if \(k=2\) then \(n=7\) and the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) 2k -4 is divisible by 7 --> \(2k-4=7q\), for some integer \(q\) --> \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\). Clearly insufficient as no info about k.

(1)+(2) Sum \(n-3 = 2k\) and \(2k-4=7q\) --> \((n-3)+(2k-4) = 2k+7q\) --> \(n=7q+7=7(q+1)\) --> \(n\) is a multiple of 7. Sufficient.

Answer: C.
How is 2k becoming 7 when you add (1)+(2)? Please explain
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,505
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,172
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,505
Kudos: 682,768
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mysteriouswoman
Bunuel
SOLUTION

If k and n are integers, is n divisible by 7?

(1) n-3 = 2k --> \(n=2k+3\), now if \(k=1\) then \(n=5\) and the answer is NO but if \(k=2\) then \(n=7\) and the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) 2k -4 is divisible by 7 --> \(2k-4=7q\), for some integer \(q\) --> \(k=\frac{7q+4}{2}\). Clearly insufficient as no info about k.

(1)+(2) Sum \(n-3 = 2k\) and \(2k-4=7q\) --> \((n-3)+(2k-4) = 2k+7q\) --> \(n=7q+7=7(q+1)\) --> \(n\) is a multiple of 7. Sufficient.

Answer: C.
How is 2k becoming 7 when you add (1)+(2)? Please explain

\((n-3)+(2k-4) = 2k+7q\);

\(n+2k-7 = 2k+7q\);

Cancel 2k: \(n-7 = 7q\);

Add 7 to both sides: \(n= 7q+7\);

\(n=7(q+1)\).
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 723
Kudos: 605
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts :)
while solving, I came up with below understanding to solve this problem,
Requesting for guidance, is this method correct / if wrong, why?

is n divisible by 7?

Statement 1: n=2k+3 ---------not sufficient
Statement 2: (2k-4) is divisible by 7
Dividend = Divisor × Quotient + Remainder
7 = (2k-4) +3
2k = 11 ------------------not suffcient

substitude in statement (1)
n=2k+3
n=11+3
n=14
14 is divisible by 7 - "Option C"
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 35,734
Own Kudos:
Posts: 35,734
Kudos: 925
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97505 posts