Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Show more
I have a question... bear with me...
in this case is it true to say that, whatever value of n^10 = (12k + 2)^10 if divided by 12, since it leads to the same remainder all the time, A is sufficient? Therefore, I did not have to find a specific value of n right?
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
I have a question... bear with me... in this case is it true to say that, whatever value of n^10 = (12k + 2)^10 if divided by 12, since it leads to the same remainder all the time, A is sufficient? Therefore, I did not have to find a specific value of n right?
Show more
Right. We don't need to find the exact value ever! We need to ensure that we can find a value (this is very important as multiple values are going to kill the option).
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Show more
Good one. Never thought of that. Kevin, could you please post the OA and OE?
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Show more
Will go with A.
n/12 has a remainder of 2. hence the remainder of n^10 can be calculated by adding the individual remainders
For cond 2)
Since n is a multiple of 13. N can have any value and each value will give out a diff remainder when divided by 12
henc INsuff
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Show more
good one.. I just confirmed using calculator... 14^10, 26^10,38^10 all leave the same remainder of 4.. i.e. remainder when 2^10 is divided by 12.
Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer. Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.
Take (II):
n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
Show more
Zooroopa, wonderful work! As for (2), n may or may not be a muliple of 12. If it is, the remainder when n^10 is divided by 12 is 0. If it is not, it will NOT be 0. OA is A. What do people mean by OE? (I made this question up)
I picked A--used with same logic as Zooroopa's logic.
I have seen variation of question but logic stays same Consider follwoing example.
lets say A and B when devided by 12 leaves remainder of R1 and R2
So, A=12x+r1
B = 12y+r2
A*B = (12x+r1)*(12y+r2)
= 12x*12y + 12x*r2 +12y*r1 + r1*r2
= 12(12xy+xr2+yr1) + R
can be represented as = 12z + R
so if we know r1 and r2(R) we know remainder of A*B.
here we can say in A that
n=12x+2 or y+2 where y=12x
n^10 = (y+2)^10 expansion of this will have terms which are power of y(y^2 or y^3) power of 2, or combination of some power of y and 2.
so we can represent 12z + R where R is multiple of 3 and will be constant for any value of n when n^10 is expanded.
hence A sufficient
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.