Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:13 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kevincan
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Last visit: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
Posts: 958
Kudos: 729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
acfuture
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sgrover
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Last visit: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 246
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
acfuture
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgrover
(C)

we can calculate the remainder, we dont need to calculate..


:beat
you are right...
i spent way too much time then....
User avatar
Zooroopa
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Last visit: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin!
Posts: 114
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.
User avatar
shahnandan
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Last visit: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Location: Munich,Germany
Posts: 239
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My logic was similar to that of zaroopa's ..I second A.
User avatar
acfuture
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.


I have a question... bear with me...
in this case is it true to say that, whatever value of n^10 = (12k + 2)^10 if divided by 12, since it leads to the same remainder all the time, A is sufficient? Therefore, I did not have to find a specific value of n right?
User avatar
Zooroopa
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Last visit: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin!
Posts: 114
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
acfuture
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.

I have a question... bear with me...
in this case is it true to say that, whatever value of n^10 = (12k + 2)^10 if divided by 12, since it leads to the same remainder all the time, A is sufficient? Therefore, I did not have to find a specific value of n right?


Right. We don't need to find the exact value ever! We need to ensure that we can find a value (this is very important as multiple values are going to kill the option).
User avatar
ps_dahiya
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Last visit: 15 Oct 2019
Posts: 1,486
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Posts: 1,486
Kudos: 1,215
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.


Good one. Never thought of that. Kevin, could you please post the OA and OE?
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.


Will go with A.

n/12 has a remainder of 2. hence the remainder of n^10 can be calculated by adding the individual remainders

For cond 2)
Since n is a multiple of 13. N can have any value and each value will give out a diff remainder when divided by 12
henc INsuff
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaynayak
n/12 has a remainder of 2. hence the remainder of n^10 can be calculated by adding the individual remainders


suppose n = 2. when n^2 divided by 12, r results 4, which we can say that 2+2 = 4. correct.
now lets divide n^3 = 8 by 12. r is 8 not 6.

how do you apply your approach???

this approach seems faulty. it would be true if 10n is divided by 12.
User avatar
sharadGmat
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Posts: 177
Kudos: 969
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.



good one.. I just confirmed using calculator... 14^10, 26^10,38^10 all leave the same remainder of 4.. i.e. remainder when 2^10 is divided by 12.
User avatar
kevincan
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Last visit: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
Posts: 958
Kudos: 729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zooroopa
I propose a different explanation - Ans is A.

Take (I):

Since n(mod12) = 2 ==> n = 12k + 2 , where k is an integer.
Now n^10 = (12k + 2)^10. Expand this. There would be 11 terms in the expression. Note that the first term is a multiple of 12. Therefore the first 10 terms would all contain some power of 12. So all of them are divisible by 12. Now we only have 2^10 remaining. We can always find the remainder of 2^10 (mod 12). So (I) holds good.

Take (II):

n is a mutliple of 13 and n^10 would have to be divided by 13. Since 12 and 13 are co-primes there wouldn't be any pattern in the remainders. So there cannot be a single remainder for all possible multiples of 13. So (II) does not hold good.


Zooroopa, wonderful work! As for (2), n may or may not be a muliple of 12. If it is, the remainder when n^10 is divided by 12 is 0. If it is not, it will NOT be 0. OA is A. What do people mean by OE? (I made this question up)
User avatar
kevincan
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Last visit: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
Posts: 958
Kudos: 729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I guess if I'm the author I should provide an OE, then. But what Zooroopa said will certainly do! OE sounds so final, though :-D
User avatar
Zooroopa
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Last visit: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin!
Posts: 114
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey kevin - good question pal! Please post a few of these supposedly 'authentic ones' 8-) !!
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i. n can be 14, 26, ...., 338, .... 494, ..... 808, ....
ii. n can be 13, 26, ...., 338, .... 494, ..... 808, ....

there are infinite numbers of values that satisfiy statement 1 and 2.
User avatar
chiragr
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Last visit: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 308
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I picked A--used with same logic as Zooroopa's logic.

I have seen variation of question but logic stays same Consider follwoing example.

lets say A and B when devided by 12 leaves remainder of R1 and R2
So, A=12x+r1
B = 12y+r2
A*B = (12x+r1)*(12y+r2)
= 12x*12y + 12x*r2 +12y*r1 + r1*r2
= 12(12xy+xr2+yr1) + R
can be represented as = 12z + R

so if we know r1 and r2(R) we know remainder of A*B.

here we can say in A that
n=12x+2 or y+2 where y=12x

n^10 = (y+2)^10 expansion of this will have terms which are power of y(y^2 or y^3) power of 2, or combination of some power of y and 2.

so we can represent 12z + R where R is multiple of 3 and will be constant for any value of n when n^10 is expanded.

hence A sufficient



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts