Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:31 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Smita04
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Last visit: 29 Oct 2012
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
1,463
 [121]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 65
Kudos: 1,463
 [121]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
113
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,350
 [42]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
27
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dreaming
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
247
 [5]
Given Kudos: 34
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.18
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 158
Kudos: 247
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,350
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,350
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=40
All PS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=61
avatar
kpali
Joined: 22 May 2013
Last visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
35
 [2]
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 35
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B
avatar
kpali
Joined: 22 May 2013
Last visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=40
All PS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=61

Hi Bunuel,

Please let me know if the above approach is correct?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kpali
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B

No, that's not correct. Function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer, thus [0.12] = 1, not 0 and [0.99] = 1, not 1.
User avatar
sunaimshadmani
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Meaning that even -0.99 will round UP to 0 and not -1??
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunaimshadmani
Meaning that even -0.99 will round UP to 0 and not -1??

Yes. The function rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. The nearest integer greater than -0.99 is 0, thus [-0.99] = 0.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.

Hope it helps.
avatar
dineshril
Joined: 27 Apr 2015
Last visit: 14 Oct 2018
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
GMAT 1: 370 Q29 V13
Products:
GMAT 1: 370 Q29 V13
Posts: 35
Kudos: 56
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0


Given [x] LI no less than x i.e [x]>=x
Find Is [2d]=0

Now [2d]=0 possible if 2d satisfies the inequality/range -1<2d<=0 ---equ(a)

Statement 1 [d]=0
=> Since [d]=0 so d lies in -1<d<=0
=> Multiplying the above inequality by 2 we have -2<2d<=0. So this range makes 2 cases
=> Case 1 When -2<2d<=-1 then [2d]=-1
=> Case 2 When -1<2d<=0 then [2d]=0
=> Since no unique sol. So NOT sufficient

Statement 2 [3d]=0
Since [3d]=0 so 3d lies in -1<3d<=0
=> Multiplying the above inequality by 2/3 we have -2/3<2d<=0.
=> So the above range satisfy equ (a)
=> Therefore [2d]=0
=> Since unique sol. So SUFFICIENT

Therefore "B"

Thanks
avatar
DrMudassir
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 01 Nov 2021
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 8
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
kpali
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B

No, that's not correct. Function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer, thus [0.12] = 1, not 0 and [0.99] = 1, not 1.



* Sorry but i still think, least number less than x means 0 for 0.12, and not 1

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DrMudassir



* Sorry but i still think, least number less than x means 0 for 0.12, and not 1

Posted from my mobile device

You are wrong. We are given that ‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x.

What is [0.12] ? What is the least integer no less than x? 0 is less than 0.12. 1 is the least integer no less than 0.12.
User avatar
DanTheGMATMan
Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 378
Kudos: 226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[b] equates the least integer greater than or equal to b, which in everyday language means that [b] rounds UP to the next integer, if it is not an integer. For example, [2.5] = 3.

So the question is, is -1< \(2b\leq{0}\)

1) -1 < \(b\leq{0}\)

Not sufficient, because 2b could move to be less than -1, with 2 increasing the magnitude of the term.

2) -1 < \(3b\leq{0}\)

If 3b is between -1 and 0, then B itself has to be between -1 and 0. Dividing out the 3 would only move it closer to 0

Sufficient

B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,587
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,587
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts