GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 16:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 3
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Nov 2018, 09:16
2
31
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

58% (01:27) correct 42% (01:42) wrong based on 743 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

Can anyone explain why the ans is "c"

Originally posted by ansgmat on 23 Feb 2011, 15:35.
Last edited by Abhishek009 on 17 Nov 2018, 09:16, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 654
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 18:19
2
artificial < nature. From the first sentence / premise.
violation of law - reverse it ! artificial > nature. Since Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are the examples of artificial arts of life. They should be assumed "better" than nature - all are direct "violations" of the law. C is obvious.
Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
Posts: 153
WE 1: 4 yr IT
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 19:38
C for me. The passage says artificial things are to do something better than the way it is done naturally. In the next line it gives examples of some of these ways and says they are in violation of nature. So, these things,being artificial, must be better than nature. Hence C.
_________________
this time, we play for keeps
Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2011, 23:17
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

Can anyone explain why the ans is "c"

My understandingThe author questions the existence of arts, on the basis that they have to be better than following nature for anyone to pursue it.Then he moves on to building, ploughing etc and states that these are violations of injunction to follow nature.

A look at the answer choices \
1.totally wrong......
2.Does not match with the author's statement.
3Digging,ploughing etc are artificial as understood above and they have to be better than natural way of existence (red font above).
4. Nowhere stated or implied in the statement.
5. It is either artificial or natural no middle path..

Therefore, Ans C....
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 202
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2011, 23:28
Author is refuting the premise that artificial is better than nature. and he uses the example of arts of life- digging, wearing clothes etc. and he clearly assumes these are better than nature- only then he can use this as an exmaple to reute the argument stated in the beginning of the sentence. Hence, C is an assumption.
Senior Manager
Status: The Final Countdown
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 280
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3.84
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2014, 02:29
ansgmat wrote:
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

Can anyone explain why the ans is "c"

Prethinking: Author thinks artificial is better than nature and gives examples of digging, plowing etc to show that these are better than nature and we do them and go against nature.He is sure that these examples somehow make us/artificial better than nature and these are enough to prove that.

A)usefulness of arts never discussed
B)Opposite.
C)exactly what we thought.
D)kinda opposite plus next step.opposite stretch.
E)nowhere mentioned,doesnt connect.

Hope it helps.Let me know if i should clarify further..

Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Posts: 70
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 23:01
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

The author questions the validity of arts, on the basis that they are supposed be better than the nature.
Then he gives examples of certain activities such as building, ploughing etc and states that these are violations of injunction to follow nature.

lets move to options
1.out of scope
2.stated in the question as it is.. can't be an answer
3 if they are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature; that means Digging, ploughing etc are artificial and have to be better than natural way of existence. Yes this can be an answer, keep.
4. not stated neither implied. out of scope
5.does not follow the author's argument. eliminate it

Therefore, Ans C.
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Posts: 88
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2018, 04:07
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Explanation --
Clearly the mindset of the author is following -
1> In all the aspects , natural is not better than artificial -
2> There are art of life which are artificial.
3> "To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes" are artificial.

Join 1 + 3 - you will get C , which is the correct answer.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.
Director
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 917
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2018, 09:17
ansgmat wrote:
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

Can anyone explain why the ans is "c"

What is the source of this question? I am unable to see any source tagged to this question.
_________________
________________
Manish

"Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me"
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what   [#permalink] 22 Oct 2018, 09:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by