Bunuel
If the recent Harvard study on analyzing social cues is accurate, the difference in comprehension between the Jahai people of the Malay Peninsula and English-speaking Europeans was
so pronounced that the gap in an earlier study, done three decades ago by researchers at MIT, between two similar groups, the Kalahari bushmen and English-speaking Americans.
(A) so pronounced that
(B) pronounced to such a degree that
(C) as pronounced as
(D) as pronounced that
(E) pronounced;
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/science/smells-descriptions-hunter-gatherers.htmlTo test their color and odor naming abilities, the researchers asked members of each group to identify colors on swatches and odors trapped inside pens. When it came to naming more than a dozen odors including leather, fish and banana, the differences were clear. The Semaq Beri used particular terms to describe odor qualities. But when the Semelai tried to identify the source, they often got it wrong.
The difference between the two groups was as pronounced as the gap in the earlier study between the Jahai and English-speaking Americans.
VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:
This question highlights the importance of slash-and-burn as a core sentence correction strategy. To figure out which answer choice creates a logical comparison, you need to see what is really being linked with the answer choices, and that is only possible by getting rid of all the garbage in the sentence. At its core, this sentence is really:
“The difference in comprehension between these two groups was as pronounced as the gap in comprehension between two similar groups.” As a result (C) is correct as it makes a logical, idiomatic, and parallel comparison between a difference and a gap. None of the others properly link the two elements in the comparison:
(A) “The difference in comprehension between these two groups was so pronounced that the gap in comprehension between two similar groups.” Clearly something is missing at the end of this second clause – this is not a complete sentence.
(B) suffers from the same problem as (A) but is even worse as it uses the awkward and unidiomatic “pronounced to such a degree that” instead of “so pronounced that”.
(D) uses the incorrect and unidiomatic comparison “as pronounced that” – it must be “as pronounced as”.
(E) uses a semicolon after the word “pronounced” to link together what follows, but the portion following the semi-colon is not an independent clause (nor does the sentence then make any sense).