Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 318

If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 04 Sep 2012, 03:03
Question Stats:
39% (02:20) correct 61% (02:10) wrong based on 1362 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true? A. x is not a prime number B. x^2+x is not a prime number C. x is positive D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !
Originally posted by sanjoo on 03 Sep 2012, 23:59.
Last edited by Bunuel on 04 Sep 2012, 03:03, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2012, 03:02
sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true?1x is just the distance between 1 and x on the number line. We are told that this distance is less than 2: (1) 13 so, 1<x<3. Since given that x is an integer then x can be 0, 1 or 2. A. x is not a prime number. Not true if x=2. B. x^2+x is not a prime number. Not true if x=1. C. x is positive. Not true if x=0. D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number. True for all three values of x. E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. Not true if x=0, since zeo is a multiple of every integer except zero itself. Answer: D.
_________________




Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 276
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2012, 02:11
sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number 1−x<2 = 2<(1x)<2 = 3<x<1 = 3>x>1 So x can hold values of 0,1 & 2 to satisfy the condition. Now we can evaluate the choices. A) 1 & 2 primes, so incorrectB) 1^2+1=2 is a prime, so incorrectC) 0 is not +ve, So incorrectD) x+2= 2,3,or 4, here 2 has 2 factor(prime), 3 has 2 factor (prime) & 4 has 3factors (prime). Hence correct choice.E) 2 is multiple of 1. So incorrect.Hence Answer D.
_________________
Regards SD  Press Kudos if you like my post. Debrief 610540580710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from600540580710finallyachievedin4thattempt142456.html




Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following m
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2013, 11:21
If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A. x is not a prime number B. x^2+x is not a prime number C. x is positive D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number
I am confused between D & E. D seems perfectly correct.
My analysis: 1<x<3 Possible values of x > 0, 1 & 2 " E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number"
x=0  False as 0 is a multiple of any odd prime number x=1  False as 1 is a multiple of any odd prime number x=2  True as 2 is not a multiple of any odd prime number.
smallest odd prime number is "3". So, when x=2 the statement is true.
Is there any flaw in my reasoning?



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 590

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following m
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2013, 12:17
mohitvarshney wrote: My analysis: 1<x<3 Possible values of x > 0, 1 & 2 " E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number"
x=0  False as 0 is a multiple of any odd prime number x=1  True as 1 is NOT a multiple of any odd prime number x=2  True as 2 is not a multiple of any odd prime number. smallest odd prime number is "3". So, when x=2 the statement is true.
Is there any flaw in my reasoning?
Apart from the highlighted part, everything is correct. For the reason that you could demonstrate that option E is not valid for x=0, we can not have E as a correct answer for a Must be True type question. 1 is a factor of every integer, not a multiple of every integer.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following m
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2013, 13:38
mau5 wrote: mohitvarshney wrote: My analysis: 1<x<3 Possible values of x > 0, 1 & 2 " E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number"
x=0  False as 0 is a multiple of any odd prime number x=1  True as 1 is NOT a multiple of any odd prime number x=2  True as 2 is not a multiple of any odd prime number. smallest odd prime number is "3". So, when x=2 the statement is true.
Is there any flaw in my reasoning?
Apart from the highlighted part, everything is correct. For the reason that you could demonstrate that option E is not valid for x=0, we can not have E as a correct answer for a Must be True type question. 1 is a factor of every integer, not a multiple of every integer. Yup I got my mistake. It is a "Must be true" question. Thanks a lot.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2013, 03:57
PiyushK wrote: Hi Bunuel, I have a doubt, as per this thread D is the correct answer. I calculated the range of x as 1<x<3, further option D says : D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number for x=0 x+2 = 2 => distinct positive factors are 1 and 2 for x=1 x+2 = 3 => distinct positive factors are 1 and 3 for x=2 x+2 = 4 => distinct positive factors are 1 and 2 2,3 are prime numbers but 1 is not a prime number as per rule/definition. Therefor I think D is also not a well articulated option. Could you please share your opinion on this. Regards, PiyushK Subject: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the followingBunuel wrote: sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true?1x is just the distance between 1 and x on the number line. We are told that this distance is less than 2: (1) 13 so, 1<x<3. Since given that x is an integer then x can be 0, 1 or 2. A. x is not a prime number. Not true if x=2. B. x^2+x is not a prime number. Not true if x=1. C. x is positive. Not true if x=0. D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number. True for all three values of x. E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. Not true if x=0, since zeo is a multiple of every integer except zero itself. Answer: D. Responding to pm. D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number. x+2 is 2, 3, or 4. 2 has 2 factors 1 and 2. 3 has 2 factors 1 and 3. 4 has 3 factors 1, 2 and 4. The number of factors of each number is a prime number. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 1

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Apr 2014, 04:06
Bunuel,
Why does 2 have 2 factors? I thought the smallest factor of any number was 2.. Is there a definition difference that I am missing?
Thanks for the reply!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Apr 2014, 04:31
demandi wrote: Bunuel,
Why does 2 have 2 factors? I thought the smallest factor of any number was 2.. Is there a definition difference that I am missing?
Thanks for the reply! A factor is a positive integer which divides some integer without a remainder. Thus the smallest factor of any integer is 1. The factors of 2 are 1 and 2.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 5

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 22 May 2014, 03:58
I think E ist also correct. as number 1 is not considered prime, as it has only one factor (itself).
Except if 0 is a multiple of every number!
Originally posted by dansa on 22 May 2014, 03:53.
Last edited by dansa on 22 May 2014, 03:58, edited 1 time in total.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2014, 03:58
dansa wrote: E ist also correct1 The question is flawed!!
number 1 is not considered prime, as it has only one factor (itself). Yes, 1 is NOT prime but it has nothing to do with option E. E says: x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. IF x=0, then this option is not always true because 0 is a multiple of every integer except 0 itself, hence it's a multiple of all odd primes: 3, 5, 7, ....
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 5

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2014, 04:00
I just understood that 0 is considered a multiple of every number. Thanks



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 10

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jun 2014, 14:10
This might be a naive question and also highlights a gap in my understand but can you please explain how 1−x<2 translates into "2<(1x)<2". Thank you. SOURH7WK wrote: sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number 1−x<2 = 2<(1x)<2 = 3<x<1 = 3>x>1 So x can hold values of 0,1 & 2 to satisfy the condition. Now we can evaluate the choices. A) 1 & 2 primes, so incorrectB) 1^2+1=2 is a prime, so incorrectC) 0 is not +ve, So incorrectD) x+2= 2,3,or 4, here 2 has 2 factor(prime), 3 has 2 factor (prime) & 4 has 3factors (prime). Hence correct choice.E) 2 is multiple of 1. So incorrect.Hence Answer D.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jun 2014, 06:56
farhanabad wrote: This might be a naive question and also highlights a gap in my understand but can you please explain how 1−x<2 translates into "2<(1x)<2". Thank you. SOURH7WK wrote: sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number 1−x<2 = 2<(1x)<2 = 3<x<1 = 3>x>1 So x can hold values of 0,1 & 2 to satisfy the condition. Now we can evaluate the choices. A) 1 & 2 primes, so incorrectB) 1^2+1=2 is a prime, so incorrectC) 0 is not +ve, So incorrectD) x+2= 2,3,or 4, here 2 has 2 factor(prime), 3 has 2 factor (prime) & 4 has 3factors (prime). Hence correct choice.E) 2 is multiple of 1. So incorrect.Hence Answer D. 1 − x < 2: (1  x) < 2; (1  x) < 2 > 2 < 1  x Hence 2 < 1  x < 2. Hope this helps.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 10

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jun 2014, 07:07
Bunuel  Thank you very much. It absolutely helps (no pun intended); and like I said there is a gap in my understanding since I believed that the absolute value of anything is always positive, hence I was viewing x1 as simply (x1) and did not consider (x1). Thanks again.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1−x<2
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jun 2014, 07:10
farhanabad wrote: Bunuel  Thank you very much. It absolutely helps (no pun intended); and like I said there is a gap in my understanding since I believed that the absolute value of anything is always positive, hence I was viewing x1 as simply (x1) and did not consider (x1). Thanks again. Absolute value of any number, expression, is more than or equal to zero but the expression in the modulus can be negative as well as positive. So, \(x1\geq{0}\) but x1 can be positive negative or 0.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2013
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Statistics
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2014, 03:16
Bunuel wrote: dansa wrote: E ist also correct1 The question is flawed!!
number 1 is not considered prime, as it has only one factor (itself). Yes, 1 is NOT prime but it has nothing to do with option E. E says: x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. IF x=0, then this option is not always true because 0 is a multiple of every integer except 0 itself, hence it's a multiple of all odd primes: 3, 5, 7, .... Bunnel, where do the multiples start for an integer? Say for 3 Do they start at 0 or should the negative multiples be considered too? 0 being the multilple of every integer is certainly a revelation to me. Thanks for that! Btw, zero has no multiples then?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58382

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2014, 03:29
Kconfused wrote: Bunuel wrote: dansa wrote: E ist also correct1 The question is flawed!!
number 1 is not considered prime, as it has only one factor (itself). Yes, 1 is NOT prime but it has nothing to do with option E. E says: x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. IF x=0, then this option is not always true because 0 is a multiple of every integer except 0 itself, hence it's a multiple of all odd primes: 3, 5, 7, .... Bunnel, where do the multiples start for an integer? Say for 3 Do they start at 0 or should the negative multiples be considered too? 0 being the multilple of every integer is certainly a revelation to me. Thanks for that! Btw, zero has no multiples then? Yes, no number is a multiple of 0. As for negative multiples: multiples of 3 are: ..., 6, 3, 0, 3, 6, ... But you should not worry about it since every GMAT divisibility question will tell you in advance that any unknowns represent positive integers, which means that ALL GMAT divisibility questions are limited to positive integers only.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Posts: 51
Location: India
GPA: 3.14
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 May 2015, 09:52
Bunuel wrote: sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true?1x is just the distance between 1 and x on the number line. We are told that this distance is less than 2: (1) 13 so, 1<x<3. Since given that x is an integer then x can be 0, 1 or 2. A. x is not a prime number. Not true if x=2. B. x^2+x is not a prime number. Not true if x=1. C. x is positive. Not true if x=0. D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number. True for all three values of x. E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. Not true if x=0, since zeo is a multiple of every integer except zero itself. Answer: D. Hi again Bunuel, Just one question. I know by trial and error that the below process is wrong. But why does the algebra not match the intuitive way of solving??? Could you pls point out where you think I am making an error? TIA. Given 1x < 2 (a) If x>0: 1x < 2 > x > 1 But this is true only for x>=0 which is a more limiting condition than x > 1. So shouldn't the result of opening the modulus be x>=0? (b) If x<0: 1+x < 2 > x<3 But this is true only for x<0 which is a more limiting condition that x<3. So shouldn't the result of opening the modulus be x<0? By the above logic x = 0. But I can clearly see that x = 1 and x =2 will also work  why the discrepancy



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3074

Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 May 2015, 11:44
avgroh wrote: Bunuel wrote: sanjoo wrote: If x is an integer and 1−x<2 then which of the following must be true?
A) x is not a prime number B) x^2+x is not a prime number C) x is positive D) Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number E) x is not a multiple of an odd prime number If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following must be true?1x is just the distance between 1 and x on the number line. We are told that this distance is less than 2: (1) 13 so, 1<x<3. Since given that x is an integer then x can be 0, 1 or 2. A. x is not a prime number. Not true if x=2. B. x^2+x is not a prime number. Not true if x=1. C. x is positive. Not true if x=0. D. Number of distinct positive factors of x+2 is a prime number. True for all three values of x. E. x is not a multiple of an odd prime number. Not true if x=0, since zeo is a multiple of every integer except zero itself. Answer: D. Hi again Bunuel, Just one question. I know by trial and error that the below process is wrong. But why does the algebra not match the intuitive way of solving??? Could you pls point out where you think I am making an error? TIA. Given 1x < 2 (a) If x>0: 1x < 2 > x > 1 But this is true only for x>=0 which is a more limiting condition than x > 1. So shouldn't the result of opening the modulus be x>=0? (b) If x<0: 1+x < 2 > x<3 But this is true only for x<0 which is a more limiting condition that x<3. So shouldn't the result of opening the modulus be x<0? By the above logic x = 0. But I can clearly see that x = 1 and x =2 will also work  why the discrepancy Hi avgroh, You are not getting the right result because you are considering the zero points of x when deciding the sign of the expression when it comes out of the modulus. We consider the zero points of the expression inside the modulus to decide the sign of the expression when it comes out of the modulus i.e. in this case zero points of (1x). So we can solve this modulus as 1. When 1 x > 0 1  x < 2 i.e. x > 1 2. When 1  x < 0 (1x) < 2 i.e. x < 3 Combining the above we get the range as 1 < x < 3. Since x is an integer it can take values of only 0,1 and 2. Just to add on to the concept, we write x = x if x > 0 and x if x < 0. On the same line, we would write x 1 = x1 if x1 > 0 and (x1) if x1 < 0 Hope it helps Regards Harsh
_________________




Re: If x is an integer and 1x<2 then which of the following
[#permalink]
15 May 2015, 11:44



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 24 posts ]



