Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
For example, I just finished GMAT Prep software, and got a 34 (69%) on the Verbal section, only making it through question #34 (I did not get to 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41).
Any idea on how much failing to finish impacted my result?
Thank you.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
From my experience and research, it's pretty substantial, when you don't finish a long string of questions... Way worst compared to if you do not answer them correctly.
My guess is that if you simply guess on the rest of them (all 7 questions), you would have scored at least a 36-37.
The link below describe some theories/tests of situations, BUT it didn't test if you leave questions blank.
When you don't physically answer questions at the end of the section, each of those questions is marked as INCORRECT and then is also PENALIZED. Thus, that "string" of 7 unanswered questions absolutely hurt your score to a significant degree. There are a variety of factors that would impact "how much" your score was affected though, so there won't be a way to determine the exact effect. Beyond the immediate unknowns (were the questions "easy", were they "experimental", etc.) there's also the issue of how you were performing BEFORE you ran out of time. Did you have to rush through a bunch of questions (basically guessing) and THEN you ran out of time. If so, then the "damage" isn't restricted to just those last 7 questions.
A V34 is a fairly strong performance in the Verbal section, so you have a decent Verbal ability. It might be that "your way" of approaching the Verbal section just takes too long. In that case, you need to learn some new tactics and work faster. Regardless, you have to make sure to answer all of the questions (even if they're just guesses), so that you can avoid the penalty.
The second bullet point at the bottom of the page notes that: "If you are on the Verbal section, it doesn’t make much difference if you guess when you have up to about 5 questions left. You should finish the item you are on to the best of your ability and not worry about the others."
From a critical thinking standpoint, it's perfectly understandable that you might question information that you've been given. Here are a few more ideas that you should probably question though:
1) That article is from 2009. The GMAT has gone through several iterations in the 5+ years since that article was posted. Is it possible that those old deductions aren't quite accurate anymore?
2) GMAC has 0 INTEREST in telling you exactly how the GMAT scoring algorithm functions. If that information were to get out and spread to the masses, then the GMAT could be "gamed", the score curve would be blown and the Test results would likely become meaningless (especially at the higher levels). So why would GMAC give you these "secrets?"
3) To the point brought up in #2 (above), it's interesting that this article was posted on the site at all. Maybe this information isn't perfectly accurate. Maybe it was accurate on older versions of the Test, but now it's "off enough" to keep anyone from using it to "game" the current version of the GMAT.
4) The researchers also don't seem to describe their methodology very well. The conclusions offered are rather general too (re: "don't run out of time" isn't exactly ground-breaking advice). Again, I can't say any of this is accurate or inaccurate because they haven't shown any data, and whatever data they have is over 5 years old.
This is all meant to say that you can believe whatever you want to believe. You asked a question and you got some answers. Take from all of this what you will.
GMAT assassins arne't born, they're made, Rich
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.