Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 18:40 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 18:40

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [3]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2021
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 135
Location: India
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Passage Summary

The Topic, the 1963 jobs demonstration at Downstate Medical Center, is covered in three dense paragraphs whose overall Scope is the purpose, composition, and effects of this unusual civil rights campaign. (Those three nouns, indeed, might compose the Roadmap of this social science passage.)

Paragraph 1 explains the dual purpose of the action—to force changes in the policies of both government and trade unions—and highlights the principal role played by moderate African American ministers who, as paragraph 2 goes on to tell us, were tapped by the national organization CORE for their ability to mobilize their people. The rest of paragraph 2 explains the heavy risks to career and reputation run by the ministers when they engaged in this massive and public act of civil disobedience.

Did the campaign achieve all of its goals? No, says paragraph 3: no new laws were passed, and no promise for a specific additional number of construction jobs for African Americans was tendered. But a pledge resulted, and public concern increased; people learned that civil rights problems weren’t restricted to the south; and the ministers were able to retain their moderate reputation. (The passage comes with no Global questions for whatever reason, but if it did, the Main Idea would be something to the effect of “The Downstate action achieved many admirable goals, but not all of the hoped for ones.”) A Roadmap to guide us to the right answers to the questions might be as simple as this:

Paragraph 1—Purpose: protest job exclusion
Paragraph 2—Ministers risked careers & reputation
Paragraph 3—Effects of the demo
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


1. It can be reasonably inferred from the passage that the author’s attitude is most favorable toward which one of the following?

Explanation

The author’s tone is pretty even-handed throughout, but it’s in paragraph 3 that some kind of emotion comes through. There’s regret that the outcome of the campaign was so equivocal (44–51), but satisfaction that public awareness and concern increased (53–60). That’s (D).

(A) Union officials’ opinions go unmentioned, but if their opinion was that the demonstrators should not get a promise of increased minority jobs, the author would certainly disapprove.

(B) No new legislation followed the demonstration, and the author is hardly cheered by that outcome.

(C) The author evidences neither approval nor disapproval of the way in which CORE related to the demonstrators; CORE’s only role in the passage was to request the ministers’ leadership, a cause for worry at the time.

(E) Again, since the author is hardly pleased that the goals of the demonstration weren’t reached, he would not approve of the negotiations that led to a disappointing outcome.

Answer: D
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


2. Which one of the following assertions about the results of the Downstate campaign does the author affirm in the passage?

Explanation

“Results” is the Hot Word here, and paragraph 3 is the Results paragraph, so a quick review of it should make the right answer stand out. (B) echoes lines 46–49 in remarkably similar terms.

(A) and (C) can be knocked out together: each is half right and half wrong. As 46–49 attest, neither new legislation nor union concessions were forthcoming after the demonstrations ended.

(D) is a 180 twice over: in its first clause (changes in governmental policy did not occur) and its second (the public reaction sounds like it was pretty immediate).

(E) falls outside the passage’s scope, which concerns only the direct results of the Downstate campaign and not the eventual success or failure, long term, of the broad goals.

Answer: B
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


3. The primary function of the reference to past activities of ministers and churches (lines 31–38) is to

Explanation

As we have seen, the overall purpose of paragraph 2 is to explain the risks to which the ministers were exposed when they agreed to lead the Downstate demonstration. Their past activities—characterized by working within the system to achieve accommodation and mediation—are contrasted with the dramatic difference in adopting an “aggressive” (line 9) civil disobedience approach, and that’s what correct choice (E) describes.

(A) is a 180, of course, because leading a demonstration was in sharp contrast to the ministers’ previous activities. Therein lay the risks.

(B) We don’t hear much about the way in which the protest was conducted, except that it was “aggressive,” and certainly we’re not told that such aggression can be explained by the earlier within-thesystem activities of the ministers.

(C) has much the same problem as (A). If CORE wanted an aggressive act of civil disobedience—as it seems they did—then they wanted something very different from the ministers’ previous acts of political influence.

(D) The author never suggests that by abandoning the aggressive Downstate protest in favor of the ministers’ traditional approach, the hiring goals might have been achieved. (Indeed, since a radical approach didn’t accomplish the direct objectives, it’s unlikely that a milder protest would have had any more success.)

Answer: E
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


4. Which one of the following does the author affirm in he passage?

Explanation

The stem leaves us out on a limb; all we can do is sniff around the choices and confirm any that sound promising against the text.

(A) CORE is the only organization cited as a challenger to the construction industry. Eliminate.

(B) “Its support” suggests paragraph 1, and there (B) is contradicted by 9–12. The ministers’ local congregations offered the most support, not national organizations. Eliminate.

(C) “After the Downstate campaign” suggests paragraph 3, which is distorted by (C). The reference to the North is to the general discrimination there (discrimination which the Downstate campaign highlighted), not a widespread situation in the construction industry in particular. Eliminate.

(D) “Sought election” hints at the end of paragraph 2, and yes indeed, lines 38–39 directly confirm (D). That’s our answer. For the record:

(E) is the precise union goal that was not achieved, cf. 46–49.

Answer: D
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32951 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


5. The passage most clearly suggests that which one of the following is true of the group of ministers who led the Downstate campaign?

Explanation

There are so many references to the Brooklyn ministers that scanning for them would demand rereading all 66 lines! Best to read a choice and look for support in the passage if it sounds promising.

(A) Happily, our search ends early. According to 31–35, the ministers had always worked toward the kinds of “general political and social goals” that Downstate represented. It’s not the goals that were different, but the means of achieving them. (A) is correct. Let’s explore why the other four are not correct, as useful practice:

(B) The passage’s last two sentences suggest that instead of organizing more Downstates, the ministers went back to their usual, moderate approaches.

(C) Though the ministers’ general goals were consistent—as correct choice (A) avers—there’s no indication that their interest in the construction trade in particular predated the Downstate action.

(D) Some activists were critical, according to 49–51, but they may have been individuals rather than “concerned organizations.” And CORE’s reaction, specifically, is never mentioned.

(E) is a 180. The ministers’ civil rights involvement began many, many years before Downstate. That comes through loud and clear in paragraph 1.

Answer: A
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne