ArgumentThe task force proposes that climbers must post a large bond that is forfeited if a rescue or calamity occurs.
Why would someone support this proposal?1. Rescues cost taxpayers money.
2. Climbing is voluntary.
3. Climbers should bear the financial consequences of their choices.
Now evaluate each principle.
(A) Taxpayers should not subsidize a freely chosen hobby and athletic endeavor of individuals.
Supports the proposal directly. The bond makes climbers pay instead of taxpayers.
Supports(B) The government is obliged to take measures to deter people from risking their lives.
A large bond would discourage some people from climbing.
Supports(C) For physically risky sports the government should issue permits only to people who have had at least minimal training in the sport.
This talks about training requirements, not about paying for rescues or posting bonds.
A person could fully support training permits and still oppose the bonding arrangement.
Does not support the proposal
(D) Citizens who use publicly subsidized rescue services should be required to pay more toward the cost of these services than citizens who do not.
The bond is essentially a way of making climbers pay for rescue costs.
Supports(E) People who engage in physically risky behavior that is not essential to anyone’s welfare should be held responsible for the cost of treating any resulting injuries.
Again, the bond makes climbers bear the costs resulting from their risky activity.
SupportsAnswer: (C)