GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 09 Dec 2019, 19:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59622
In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2019, 02:40
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (01:39) correct 61% (01:21) wrong based on 68 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Competition Mode Question



In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."

(A) legal, as they are violating
(B) legal; a violation of
(C) legal, but rather violate
(D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
(E) legal, rather they violate

_________________
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
V
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5466
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2019, 03:10
1
co relative conjuction error .. not x but y
IMO C ; is correct
legal, but rather violate

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are [url]not legal, as they are violating[/url] "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."

(A) legal, as they are violating
(B) legal; a violation of
(C) legal, but rather violate
(D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
(E) legal, rather they violate
VP
VP
avatar
D
Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Posts: 1143
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2019, 04:15
Conjunctions "but" & "rather" cannot be used as there are no contradictory statements
--> C, D & E are out

Between A & B, Verb form > Noun form --> A is the best choice

IMO Option A
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 935
Location: United States
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2019, 04:31
1
Quote:
In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."

(A) legal, as they are violating
(B) legal; a violation of
(C) legal, but rather violate
(D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
(E) legal, rather they violate


IDIOM: "not X, but (rather) Y"

Ans (C)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Posts: 338
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '22, ISB '20, NUS '20
GPA: 4
Reviews Badge
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2019, 05:33
1
the correct idiom......not x, but rather y............

OA:C
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 18 May 2019
Posts: 534
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2019, 06:05
1
The best answer in my view is option C.

The idiom tested by this question is not x but rather y. Based on this split, options A, B, and E can be eliminated.
Between C and D, C is more concise compared with option D. Hence the answer is option C.

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."

(A) legal, as they are violating
(B) legal; a violation of
(C) legal, but rather violate
(D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
(E) legal, rather they violate
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59622
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2019, 00:18
Bunuel wrote:

Competition Mode Question



In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."

(A) legal, as they are violating
(B) legal; a violation of
(C) legal, but rather violate
(D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
(E) legal, rather they violate


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The correct idiom is: not x, but rather y
The correct sentence structure is: the military commissions ... are not legal, but rather violate

A. the phrase the military commissions ... are not legal, as they are violating is not the proper idiom
B. a violation of ... lacks a subject; the use of the semi-colon abruptly cuts off the previous sentence
C. the correct idiom (not x, but rather y) is used
D. the phrase the military commissions ... are not legal, but rather they is not the proper idiom; the phrase they constitute a violation of is not concise
E. the phrase the military commissions ... are not legal, rather they violate is not the proper idiom
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2019, 00:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S.

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne