Last visit was: 15 May 2025, 00:25 It is currently 15 May 2025, 00:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
enigma123
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
Posts: 392
Kudos: 18,441
 [124]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
109
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 101,415
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,515
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,415
Kudos: 724,291
 [39]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dentobizz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2021
Posts: 401
Own Kudos:
1,908
 [12]
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 401
Kudos: 1,908
 [12]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
subhajeet
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Last visit: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
253
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Status:MBA Aspirant
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 78
Kudos: 253
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans is C

From the statement we can make an eq as a_n = a_(n-1)*k where n>1 and k>1

given the fifth term is less than 1000 i.e. a_5 <1000

to solve this I first take a_5 = 1000
to get the first term as max I take k=2 and using the above equation get a_1 = 62.5

since a_5<1000 so a_1 = 62
User avatar
enigma123
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
Posts: 392
Kudos: 18,441
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Bunuel. Your explanations are awesome.
avatar
subhajeet
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Last visit: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Status:MBA Aspirant
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 78
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="Bunuel]
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.[/quote]

Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 101,415
Own Kudos:
724,291
 [2]
Given Kudos: 93,515
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,415
Kudos: 724,291
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
subhajeet
Bunuel
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.

Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.

We are told that the first term of the sequence is a non-negative integer, so yes, the first term could equal to zero.

In this case we'll have the sequence with all numbers equal to zero: \(x_{min}=0\); \(x*r=0\); \(x*r^2=0\); \(x*r^3=0\); \(x*r^4=0<1,000\), ... (By the way for this scenario \(r\) could be any integer)

For the case when the first term is 62 (and \(r=2\)) the sequence will be: \(x_{max}=62\); \(x*r=124\); \(x*r^2=248\); \(x*r^3=496\); \(x*r^4=992<1,000\).

As you can see the first term can take all integer values from 0 to 62, inclusive: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}, so total of 63 values.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
verycoolguy33
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 17
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 101,415
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,515
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,415
Kudos: 724,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
verycoolguy33
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.

I see your point. But, it's kind of other way around.

If the first term is 0 then the first five terms will be {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} and this set is perfectly OK. Yes, in this case, r can be any integer, not necessarily greater than 1, though if is is greater than 1, then the set still holds true.

Correct answer: D (63).

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 101,415
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,515
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,415
Kudos: 724,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE
User avatar
ziko
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.9
WE:Marketing (Other)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

In order to max the first number we need to min the constant integer. The min integer value greater than 1 is 2, so lets take constant as 2. Another thing we know is that the fith term is less than 1000. Our sequence is the following X, 2X, 4X, 8X, 16X. Basically 16X<1000 ---> x<62.5, the closest integer value is 62.
If the first integer value is 62 the fith will be less than 1000, that means that all the nonnegative integers less than 62 will fit into our conditions. Overall there are 0...62=63 integer values. So the answer is D.
User avatar
12bhang
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Last visit: 31 Mar 2015
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Schools: NTU '16 (A)
Schools: NTU '16 (A)
Posts: 42
Kudos: 475
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
3,257
 [1]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 479
Kudos: 3,257
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
12bhang
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?

IF the question asks that, the minimum no of NON-NEGATIVE values that a can take is 1, for a=0. Then, no matter how large the value of r is,it will really not make any difference.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Raihanuddin
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Last visit: 29 Aug 2021
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Concentration: Finance, Finance
Posts: 90
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Back-solving should work.
Let 1st = 60, 2nd=120 3rd=240 4th=480 5th=960
Add 2 = 2 4 8 16 32

So, 5th = 960+32=992. 62 numbers+ 0(Zero) = 63 numbers.

Why Zero? Since non-negative numbers, we have to consider Zero as one possible option.
avatar
rhythmboruah
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Last visit: 10 Aug 2014
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2025
Posts: 101,415
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,515
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,415
Kudos: 724,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rhythmboruah
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.

It seems that you misinterpreted the question. The question asks: what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

We have that: \(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\).

Does this make sense?

Check complete solution here: in-a-certain-sequence-every-term-after-the-first-is-determi-126030.html#p1028629
User avatar
vad3tha
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Last visit: 15 Dec 2023
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 107
Kudos: 567
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
enigma123
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?


Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.

Thanks, I came up with 62, should have read the question more carefully
User avatar
fra
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Last visit: 20 Aug 2019
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 16
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since we must find the maximum number of values, we must minimize the constant of multiplication i.e-2.

If we plug in 64, we end up with 1024 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 63, we end up with 1008 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 62, we end up with 992 as the 5th term.

So we can have 62 values from 1 and we must remember that 0 is a possible value too.

Therefore in total, there can be 63 such possible values.

P.S- Please correct me if my approach is wrong!
User avatar
mathivanan
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Last visit: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Posts: 84
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
enigma123
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64
I guess it is 63. when k=2, the fifth term is 16x62<1000 and a can assume zero.
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 306
Kudos: 737
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
enigma123
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?


Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.

How 0 is possible? If it is 0 then every successive term will become 0 as we are multiplying with constant
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
101415 posts
PS Forum Moderator
581 posts