It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 11:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

6 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 533

Kudos [?]: 4210 [6], given: 217

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2012, 22:42
6
This post received
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (01:56) correct 75% (02:07) wrong based on 971 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Kudos [?]: 4210 [6], given: 217

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: MBA Aspirant
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 1

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2012, 03:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Ans is C

From the statement we can make an eq as a_n = a_(n-1)*k where n>1 and k>1

given the fifth term is less than 1000 i.e. a_5 <1000

to solve this I first take a_5 = 1000
to get the first term as max I take k=2 and using the above equation get a_1 = 62.5

since a_5<1000 so a_1 = 62

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 1

8 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 988 [8], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2012, 04:52
8
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?


You can solve the problem using equations or take a logical route.

I'll do it by logical elimination.
We are given the following: T1, T2, T3..T5 are 5 terms of a sequence, where T2 = K*T1 , T3=K*T2 [K> 1 & T5 < 1000]

To get the MAXIMUM number of non-negative integer values for T1 , we have to take the value of K as low as possible and K> 1 (given) therefore let us take K=2. Looking at the options we can figure out that value of T1 will be b/w 60-64.

Lets us start by the maximum value of 64.
T1=64, T2=128......T5=1024 (but T5 < 1000), hence E is out
T1=63,T2=126........T5=1008 ,Hence D is out
T1=62, T2=64.........T5= 992. This works .Thus all values from 1 to 62 will work .
But we are told that T1 is a non-negative integer, so T1=0 (zero) will also work. Thus 0 to 62 values will work . Therefore total number of values equals 63 .Option D.

Alternatively equations can be formed as shown above T (n+1) = K* Tn and T5 <1000. substutuite for T5=1000 and get T1 (T1=62.5) ,but T1 has to be integer therefore T1=62 ,then the method as above. Hope this helps

What is the source of the problem and the answer?
_________________

How to select your BSchool?
General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum


Last edited by dentobizz on 13 Jan 2012, 05:18, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 988 [8], given: 321

Expert Post
9 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132595 [9], given: 12326

Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2012, 05:17
9
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?



Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 132595 [9], given: 12326

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 533

Kudos [?]: 4210 [0], given: 217

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2012, 23:21
Thanks Bunuel. Your explanations are awesome.
_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Kudos [?]: 4210 [0], given: 217

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: MBA Aspirant
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2012, 03:30
[quote="Bunuel]
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.[/quote]

Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 1

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132595 [1], given: 12326

Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2012, 03:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
subhajeet wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.


Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.


We are told that the first term of the sequence is a non-negative integer, so yes, the first term could equal to zero.

In this case we'll have the sequence with all numbers equal to zero: \(x_{min}=0\); \(x*r=0\); \(x*r^2=0\); \(x*r^3=0\); \(x*r^4=0<1,000\), ... (By the way for this scenario \(r\) could be any integer)

For the case when the first term is 62 (and \(r=2\)) the sequence will be: \(x_{max}=62\); \(x*r=124\); \(x*r^2=248\); \(x*r^3=496\); \(x*r^4=992<1,000\).

As you can see the first term can take all integer values from 0 to 62, inclusive: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}, so total of 63 values.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 132595 [1], given: 12326

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 2

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2012, 02:33
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 2

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2012, 02:43
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
verycoolguy33 wrote:
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.


I see your point. But, it's kind of other way around.

If the first term is 0 then the first five terms will be {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} and this set is perfectly OK. Yes, in this case, r can be any integer, not necessarily greater than 1, though if is is greater than 1, then the set still holds true.

Correct answer: D (63).

Hope it's clear.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2013, 05:53

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 17

Concentration: Strategy, International Business
Schools: INSEAD Jan '13
GPA: 3.9
WE: Marketing (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2013, 06:52
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

In order to max the first number we need to min the constant integer. The min integer value greater than 1 is 2, so lets take constant as 2. Another thing we know is that the fith term is less than 1000. Our sequence is the following X, 2X, 4X, 8X, 16X. Basically 16X<1000 ---> x<62.5, the closest integer value is 62.
If the first integer value is 62 the fith will be less than 1000, that means that all the nonnegative integers less than 62 will fit into our conditions. Overall there are 0...62=63 integer values. So the answer is D.
_________________

If you found my post useful and/or interesting - you are welcome to give kudos!

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 17

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 39

Schools: NTU '16 (A)
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2013, 22:32
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 39

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 627

Kudos [?]: 1386 [1], given: 136

Premium Member
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2013, 22:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
12bhang wrote:
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?


IF the question asks that, the minimum no of NON-NEGATIVE values that a can take is 1, for a=0. Then, no matter how large the value of r is,it will really not make any difference.

Hope this helps.
_________________

All that is equal and not-Deep Dive In-equality

Hit and Trial for Integral Solutions

Kudos [?]: 1386 [1], given: 136

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 149

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 161

Concentration: Finance, Finance
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2014, 11:20
Back-solving should work.
Let 1st = 60, 2nd=120 3rd=240 4th=480 5th=960
Add 2 = 2 4 8 16 32

So, 5th = 960+32=992. 62 numbers+ 0(Zero) = 63 numbers.

Why Zero? Since non-negative numbers, we have to consider Zero as one possible option.

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 161

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2014, 12:50
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2014, 06:31
rhythmboruah wrote:
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.


It seems that you misinterpreted the question. The question asks: what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

We have that: \(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\).

Does this make sense?

Check complete solution here: in-a-certain-sequence-every-term-after-the-first-is-determi-126030.html#p1028629
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 132595 [0], given: 12326

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 148

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2014, 22:48
Bunuel wrote:
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?



Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.


Thanks, I came up with 62, should have read the question more carefully
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 148

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 8

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2014, 10:16
Since we must find the maximum number of values, we must minimize the constant of multiplication i.e-2.

If we plug in 64, we end up with 1024 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 63, we end up with 1008 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 62, we end up with 992 as the 5th term.

So we can have 62 values from 1 and we must remember that 0 is a possible value too.

Therefore in total, there can be 63 such possible values.

P.S- Please correct me if my approach is wrong!

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 8

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2015, 08:22
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

I guess it is 63. when k=2, the fifth term is 16x62<1000 and a can assume zero.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15703

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 00:06
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2017, 00:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.