Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 06:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 06:41

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [112]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92913
Own Kudos [?]: 618940 [37]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 404
Own Kudos [?]: 1833 [12]
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Health Care)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Status:MBA Aspirant
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Ans is C

From the statement we can make an eq as a_n = a_(n-1)*k where n>1 and k>1

given the fifth term is less than 1000 i.e. a_5 <1000

to solve this I first take a_5 = 1000
to get the first term as max I take k=2 and using the above equation get a_1 = 62.5

since a_5<1000 so a_1 = 62
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]
Thanks Bunuel. Your explanations are awesome.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Status:MBA Aspirant
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]
[quote="Bunuel]
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.[/quote]

Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92913
Own Kudos [?]: 618940 [2]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Non negative integers in a sequence [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
subhajeet wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.


Bunnel here you have taken x_min as 0, and here we are given to find the max no of non negative integers. Since 0 is neither +ve nor -ve, so do we still have to take 0???
I took x_min as 1.


We are told that the first term of the sequence is a non-negative integer, so yes, the first term could equal to zero.

In this case we'll have the sequence with all numbers equal to zero: \(x_{min}=0\); \(x*r=0\); \(x*r^2=0\); \(x*r^3=0\); \(x*r^4=0<1,000\), ... (By the way for this scenario \(r\) could be any integer)

For the case when the first term is 62 (and \(r=2\)) the sequence will be: \(x_{max}=62\); \(x*r=124\); \(x*r^2=248\); \(x*r^3=496\); \(x*r^4=992<1,000\).

As you can see the first term can take all integer values from 0 to 62, inclusive: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}, so total of 63 values.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92913
Own Kudos [?]: 618940 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
verycoolguy33 wrote:
Hi Bunuel ,
I have a doubt regarding the use of '0' as a first term . If we see the wording of the qs, it says - 'every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1.'
If all the term of the sequence are '0' - then the statement is wrong - which is not possible . Why so ?
Say all the term are indeed '0' - then to get next term we can multiply anything with the previous term not specifically 'an integer constant greater than 1' as told by the statement .

In this line of explanation the right answer should be C> 62 and not D>63 .

Please clarify .
Thanks,
VCG.


I see your point. But, it's kind of other way around.

If the first term is 0 then the first five terms will be {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} and this set is perfectly OK. Yes, in this case, r can be any integer, not necessarily greater than 1, though if is is greater than 1, then the set still holds true.

Correct answer: D (63).

Hope it's clear.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92913
Own Kudos [?]: 618940 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 186 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.9
WE:Marketing (Other)
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

In order to max the first number we need to min the constant integer. The min integer value greater than 1 is 2, so lets take constant as 2. Another thing we know is that the fith term is less than 1000. Our sequence is the following X, 2X, 4X, 8X, 16X. Basically 16X<1000 ---> x<62.5, the closest integer value is 62.
If the first integer value is 62 the fith will be less than 1000, that means that all the nonnegative integers less than 62 will fit into our conditions. Overall there are 0...62=63 integer values. So the answer is D.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 433 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Schools: NTU '16 (A)
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 485
Own Kudos [?]: 3092 [1]
Given Kudos: 141
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
1
Kudos
12bhang wrote:
What if the question stated that we need to find the minimum number of values that a can take?

So, again => ar^4<1000

we need to maximise r^4:
if we pick r =4, then we have r^4=256. then a can take 4 values.
(a<3.96) so a can be 3,2,1,0
However, if we take r=5, then a ^4=625 and a can take 2 values i. 0 as a<1000/625
=> a<1.xy(xy is some decimal value)
so can either be one or a can be 0

so minimum 2 values.

we cannot take r =6 because 6^4>1000

Am i right in my reasoning?


IF the question asks that, the minimum no of NON-NEGATIVE values that a can take is 1, for a=0. Then, no matter how large the value of r is,it will really not make any difference.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 537 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Concentration: Finance, Finance
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Back-solving should work.
Let 1st = 60, 2nd=120 3rd=240 4th=480 5th=960
Add 2 = 2 4 8 16 32

So, 5th = 960+32=992. 62 numbers+ 0(Zero) = 63 numbers.

Why Zero? Since non-negative numbers, we have to consider Zero as one possible option.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92913
Own Kudos [?]: 618940 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
rhythmboruah wrote:
Hi All,

I have a serious doubt regarding the question :

since , ar^4<1000 =>

r can be 2,3,4,5 only . but all the solutions mentioned in the post only assume r = 2 .

however if we take the above mentioned values for r ... we will get even more values of a.

eg : if r =2 => a can have 63 values as explained above.
if r =3 => a can have another 12 values etc isn't it??

please let me know if im wrong.

thanks.


It seems that you misinterpreted the question. The question asks: what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

We have that: \(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\).

Does this make sense?

Check complete solution here: in-a-certain-sequence-every-term-after-the-first-is-determi-126030.html#p1028629
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 526 [0]
Given Kudos: 148
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?



Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.


Thanks, I came up with 62, should have read the question more carefully
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Since we must find the maximum number of values, we must minimize the constant of multiplication i.e-2.

If we plug in 64, we end up with 1024 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 63, we end up with 1008 as the 5th term.
If we plug in 62, we end up with 992 as the 5th term.

So we can have 62 values from 1 and we must remember that 0 is a possible value too.

Therefore in total, there can be 63 such possible values.

P.S- Please correct me if my approach is wrong!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 72 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?

A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

I guess it is 63. when k=2, the fifth term is 16x62<1000 and a can assume zero.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Posts: 312
Own Kudos [?]: 696 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Send PM
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
enigma123 wrote:
In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determined by multiplying the previous term by an integer constant greater than 1. If the fifth term of the sequence is less than 1000, what is the maximum number of non-negative integer values possible for the first term?
A) 60
B) 61
C) 62
D) 63
E) 64

Any idea on the concept and how to solve this please?



Given sequence:
\(x\);
\(x*r\);
\(x*r^2\);
\(x*r^3\);
\(x*r^4<1,000\) (where x is the first term and r is the constant greater than 1).

To maximize the # of non-negative integer values possible for \(x\), we should minimize the value of \(r\) and since \(r=integer>1\) then \(r=2\). (General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others and to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.)

Thus, \(x*2^4<1,000\) -->\(x<\frac{1,000}{16}=62,5\) --> as the first term must be a non-negative integer then: \(x_{max}=62\) and \(x_{min}=0\) --> total of 63 values possible for the first term x: {0, 1, 2, ..., 62}.

Answer: D.


How 0 is possible? If it is 0 then every successive term will become 0 as we are multiplying with constant
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a certain sequence, every term after the first is determi [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
92912 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne