agrotechpepper
But why not C? The author is also mentioning the nature of the ion to move in straight line thus magnetic field is introduced. Kindly help in explaining where I am thinking wrong. Thanks.
I understand why option C seems appealing - you've correctly identified that the passage mentions ions traveling in straight lines without the magnetic field. This is a classic GMAT trap answer that tests your ability to distinguish between
primary purpose and
supporting details.
Why E is Correct (Not C):
The key is understanding the
hierarchical structure of the information presented:
- Main Purpose of the Passage: Explain how a cyclotron works
- Role of Magnetic Field: Essential component that enables the cycling mechanism
- Supporting Detail: Ions would travel straight without the magnetic field
When the author states
"Were it not for the magnetic field, the ions would be accelerated in a straight line; instead, they are deflected into a circular path back toward the dee gap," this isn't meant to
prove that ions naturally travel straight. Rather, it's explaining
why the magnetic field is necessary for the cyclotron to function.
Critical Distinction:- Option C suggests: The author's goal is to support/prove a scientific principle about ion behavior
- Option E recognizes: The author's goal is to explain the magnetic field's functional necessity in the cyclotron's operation
The "Primary Purpose" Test: Ask yourself:
If I removed this information, would the passage still achieve its goal?- Without explaining the magnetic field's role in deflecting ions back to the dee gap, the cyclotron's mechanism remains unexplained ✗
- Without proving ions travel straight naturally, the cyclotron explanation still works ✓
Strategic Takeaway for RC Questions: When asked about why an author mentions something "primarily," always connect it to the passage's
overall purpose, not to interesting side facts mentioned along the way. GMAT frequently uses true statements from the passage as wrong answers when they're not the
primary reason for including that information.
The magnetic field isn't mentioned to teach us about ion physics - it's mentioned because without it, the cyclotron simply wouldn't work. The ions
must be deflected back to continue the acceleration cycle.