Rate of work of \(30\) original machines = \(\frac{1}{2}\)
Rate of work of \(1\) original machine = \(M\) = \(\frac{1}{2*30}\) = \(\frac{1}{60}\)
The question states, initially, \(20\) original machines worked for \(1.5\) hours. We know the rate of work of \(1\) original machine \(M\).
Therefore, the work done by these \(20\) original machines in \(1.5\) hours is \(20*(M)*1.5 = 20*(\frac{1}{60})*3/2 = \frac{1}{2}\) units of work.
So, \(\frac{1}{2}\) of the work is remaining.
At this point they brought in \(20\) backup machines to work along with the \(20\) original machines. Can these \(40\) machines complete the remaining work in less than \(0.75\) hours?
Statement 1: The rate of a backup machine is lower than the rate of an original machine.Let the rate of work of a backup machine be \(B\). This statement says \(B<M\). Let's see how much time is required for the \(40\) machines to complete \(\frac{1}{2}\) of the work if \(B = M\). Time is \(x\) hours.\((20M + 20B)x = \frac{1}{2}\)
\(40(\frac{1}{60})x = \frac{1}{2}\)
\(x = 0.75\)
If \(B = M\), the time taken to complete the remaining work would be exactly \(0.75\) hours. If \(B<M\), then time taken would obviously be more than \(0.75\) hours.
Therefore, Statement 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2: 60 backup machines working together can manufacture the same batch of parts in 2 hours.With this statement, we can find what B is.\(60B*2 = 1\)\(B = 1/120\)At this point you can plug in the value of \(B\) and \(M\) into \((20M + 20B)x = \frac{1}{2}\) to find what \(x\) will be.
But, as we have already proved with Statement 1, if \(B<M,\) then time taken to complete the remaining work is more than \(0.75\) hours. Here, \(B\) is less than \(M\) (\(\frac{1}{120}<\frac{1}{60}\)).Therefore, Statement 2 is sufficient.Final answer: D (EACH statement ALONE is sufficient)