Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:41 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ingeniouseerat
Joined: 21 Oct 2016
Last visit: 22 Nov 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
17
 [12]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
WE:Research (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 8
Kudos: 17
 [12]
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ManSab
Joined: 03 May 2014
Last visit: 18 Jun 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Posts: 16
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shruthiarvindh
Joined: 24 Jun 2017
Last visit: 14 Mar 2022
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: Switzerland
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My understanding of the passage:

Gap Analysis: More people stating A(lack of demand) than B(High corporate taxes) as a reason for C(not hiring new employees). Therefore, B did not cause C. B --->x C
For Assumptions: Answer choice MUST BE TRUE

Which of the following statements must be true for the above argument to hold?

A) The lack of demand is not due to higher prices charged by corporates for their products in order to account for the higher tax rate.
The negative of this choice: A is caused by B. Therefore, conclusion that B did not cause C is broken. Hence, this choice is correct.

B) A higher corporate tax rate does not necessarily lead corporates to adopt low cost strategies.
low cost strategies is not relevant to the conclusion to identify what caused lower employment rates.

C) The opinions of all the 53 economists surveyed are equally credible.
I saw this as a potential contender, since the argument is based on the survey results. But the word "all" eliminates this, since
it need not be true that ALL 53 economists surveyed must be equally credible for conclusion to hold true.


D) Most of the claims made by the economists surveyed have been proved to be true in the past.
So?? validity of their past claims has no relevance here and it is not mandatory that their past claims MUST BE TRUE for this claim to be true.

E) High corporate taxes do not aid the growth of the new companies.
growth of new companies is out of scope.
User avatar
jibberjabber
Joined: 13 Jan 2019
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE:General Management (Consulting)
Posts: 10
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain how and why A is the correct answer?

Thanks.
User avatar
XyLan
User avatar
ESMT Berlin School Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
483
 [3]
Given Kudos: 104
Status:The darker the night, the nearer the dawn!
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 245
Kudos: 483
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jibberjabber
Can someone explain how and why A is the correct answer?

Thanks.
Argument states:
    We have different voices stating 2 different things -
      X( lack of demand) ----CAN lead to----> Z( lower employment rates)
      Y( corporate taxation) ----CAN lead to----> Z( lower employment rates)

    Conclusion:
      Y ----does NOT lead to----> Z( lower employment rates)

Pre-Think:
    What if Y could have affected X, leading to Z?
    If that's the case, the argument will shatter.

Answer choice analysis:
    A. The lack of demand is NOT due to higher prices charged by corporates for their products in order to account for the higher tax rate.
      Aha!
      !A = In order to account for the higher tax rate( Y( corporate taxation )),
      higher prices charged by corporates for their products --------> The lack of demand( Z( lower employment rates))
      Meaning: Y( corporate taxation) ----was somehow responsible for----> Z( lower employment rates)
      The negation BREAKS the argument.

    B. A higher corporate tax rate does not necessarily lead corporates to adopt low-cost strategies.
      Good to know. Let's negate B:
      A higher corporate tax rate does necessarily lead corporates to adopt low-cost strategies.
      !B = Y( corporate taxation) ----------> low-cost strategies.
      However, low-cost strategies do NOT necessarily equal lower employment rates, unless backed by the argument.
      Shell-Game. OUT

    C. The opinions of all the 53 economists surveyed are equally credible.
      Not important. Their credibilities CAN easily vary amongst themselves, yet the argument CAN stand true.
      The negation does NOT break the conclusion. OUT

    D. Most of the claims made by the economists surveyed have been proved to be true in the past.
      Least bothered about what happened in the past. OUT

    E. High corporate taxes do not aid the growth of new companies.
      Growth of companies? That too new. Nope. E is OUT
      With each passing word, E loses relevance.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts