Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:01 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gamezfreak
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Last visit: 21 Apr 2020
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
52
 [28]
Given Kudos: 17
WE:Sales (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 41
Kudos: 52
 [28]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
akhu
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Last visit: 22 Feb 2014
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
88
 [5]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, General Management
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
Posts: 25
Kudos: 88
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 846
Own Kudos:
5,145
 [4]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 846
Kudos: 5,145
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
argha
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Last visit: 25 May 2014
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
68
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 97
Kudos: 68
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B is awkward.

It says that (County officials)they might have been expected to have reduced them(property taxes). How can "someone might have been expected..."? IMO, it should be "it might have been expected of someone..."



Regards

Argha
User avatar
imyuva
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Last visit: 31 May 2018
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
61
 [3]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT 1: 510 Q46 V17
WE:Web Development (Energy)
GMAT 1: 510 Q46 V17
Posts: 53
Kudos: 61
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gamezfreak
In a seven to four vote last week, Crane County officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be reduced.
A. it might have been expected for it to be reduced
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced
D. its reducing might have been expected
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced


I feel that B also have error. It is not clear what "they" and "them" refers.
Crane County officials - Plural
property taxes - Plural
Both are plural.

By considering the meaning, We can say that they refers to Crane County officials and them refers to property taxes. it also awkward.
User avatar
hovhannesmkrtchyan
Joined: 10 Oct 2017
Last visit: 23 Jan 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.19
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think correct choice B has an error, since in a sentence every 'they' and 'them' must have only one logical antecedent.

We cannot say that in the first instance 'they' is referred to officials and then 'them' refers to property taxes.
User avatar
Scuven
Joined: 26 Jun 2018
Last visit: 06 Mar 2023
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
29
 [2]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
Posts: 60
Kudos: 29
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gamezfreak
In a seven to four vote last week, Crane County officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be reduced.
A. it might have been expected for it to be reduced
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced
D. its reducing might have been expected
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced

In a seven to four vote last week, Crane County officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be reduced.
A. it might have been expected for it to be reduced

It has no precedent referent (Both officials and taxes are plural
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them
Even though they may appear not clear, they are parallel with the previous close construction "Officials raise taxes, they are expected to reduce them

C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced
I'm not so sure whether or not They is clear since we have both Officials and taxes but one thing is certain, "that it should be reduced " it has no referent

D. its reducing might have been expected
Its is a possessive pronoun with no antecedent (or we could say from a logical point of view, with an antecedent with which it doesn't agree with
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced
In the construction of the verb "Someone" is expected to do something. Thus here might have been an expectation has no referent to the person expected and + "for them to be reduced" is not consistent with the logic of the phrase. Taxes can't reduce themself but by someone else.
User avatar
Bambi2021
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Last visit: 23 Dec 2021
Posts: 318
Own Kudos:
136
 [2]
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 318
Kudos: 136
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Im quite convinced that our experts here would call this a worthless practice question. Correct me if Im wrong.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DrHuber
Joined: 23 May 2023
Last visit: 07 Dec 2023
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Status:Admissions consultant
Affiliations: MBA Center
Location: France
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
GPA: 3
WE:Operations (Education)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 116
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct option is B.
Option A is incorrect because the phrase "it might have been expected for it to be reduced" is repetitive and redundant.
Option B is the correct answer.
Option C is incorrect because the phrase "they might have been expected that it should be reduced" is awkward and does not convey the intended meaning.
Option D is incorrect because the phrase "its reducing might have been expected" is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense in the context.
Option E is incorrect; it has a tense and idiom problem and theere has no referent.
User avatar
Samiun
Joined: 09 May 2024
Last visit: 24 Dec 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: Bangladesh
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The pronouns are jumping at me saying they are hilarious. Can anyone explain to me the info chosen for option B ?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts