Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
21%
(01:52)
correct 79%
(02:10)
wrong
based on 14
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In an economic downturn, companies tempted to take advantage of job applicants as unemployment rates rise should reconsider, for such actions could hurt these companies when the economy recovers. Researchers surveyed employees about their experiences as applicants with their current employers. Those who felt they had been treated unfairly during hiring were twice as likely to respond that they were looking for jobs outside their company, even after five years. Among the actions applicants considered unfair were slow responses from employers and pressure to accept offers quickly.
A. Recovery from an economic downturn usually affects company profits before it affects hiring practices.
B. The unwillingness of a company to negotiate compensation levels is often considered unfair.
C. During an economic downturn, the jobs available outside one's current company are usually limited.
D. An economic recovery usually occurs less than five years after the start of an economic downturn.
E. A rising unemployment rate is a widely accepted indication of an economic downturn.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The passage’s conclusion: companies that mistreat applicants should reconsider because mistreatment makes those hires more likely to look elsewhere long-term, which could hurt the company when the economy recovers.
Key point: the survey finds that unfairly treated hires are twice as likely to be looking for outside jobs even after five years. To link that to harm during recovery, we need the recovery to occur within that five-year window—so the increased job searching will coincide with improved job availability.
Eliminate other options: A is irrelevant—timing of profits vs. hiring doesn’t connect the survey result to harm during recovery. B simply restates an example of unfairness, not the timing link. C would weaken the conclusion (if outside jobs are limited during downturn, mistreated hires couldn’t leave), so it’s the opposite of what we need. E is just a definition of downturn and doesn’t strengthen the link.
Good explanation. Thanks! Nobody seems to have gotten this correct yet!
ankushsambare
The passage’s conclusion: companies that mistreat applicants should reconsider because mistreatment makes those hires more likely to look elsewhere long-term, which could hurt the company when the economy recovers.
Key point: the survey finds that unfairly treated hires are twice as likely to be looking for outside jobs even after five years. To link that to harm during recovery, we need the recovery to occur within that five-year window—so the increased job searching will coincide with improved job availability.
Eliminate other options: A is irrelevant—timing of profits vs. hiring doesn’t connect the survey result to harm during recovery. B simply restates an example of unfairness, not the timing link. C would weaken the conclusion (if outside jobs are limited during downturn, mistreated hires couldn’t leave), so it’s the opposite of what we need. E is just a definition of downturn and doesn’t strengthen the link.
In an economic downturn, companies tempted to take advantage of job applicants as unemployment rates rise should reconsider, for such actions could hurt these companies when the economy recovers. Researchers surveyed employees about their experiences as applicants with their current employers. Those who felt they had been treated unfairly during hiring were twice as likely to respond that they were looking for jobs outside their company, even after five years. Among the actions applicants considered unfair were slow responses from employers and pressure to accept offers quickly.
A. Recovery from an economic downturn usually affects company profits before it affects hiring practices.
B. The unwillingness of a company to negotiate compensation levels is often considered unfair.
C. During an economic downturn, the jobs available outside one's current company are usually limited.
D. An economic recovery usually occurs less than five years after the start of an economic downturn.
E. A rising unemployment rate is a widely accepted indication of an economic downturn.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.