Hi
celialem Su1206 ssb_619 LYC1018Sharing my thoughts to help...
Evaluate usually asks a question which has a yes/no answer and focuses on the topic of interest in the conclusion
Conclusion:
The researchers concluded that capuchin monkeys generally prefer to avoid unhelpful individuals.A. capuchin monkeys, in a second, similar experiment, conducted for comparison, watched Person A being helpful to Person BWe are concerned to evaluate the conclusion from the first experiment. Here, we do not know if they chose person A or B after the second experiment. Also they prefer to avoid unhelpful individuals, nothing has been said about preference for helpful people. OutB. capuchin monkeys with more-helpful dispositions are more likely than those with less-helpful dispositions to offer food to and accept food from other capuchin monkeysWe are concerned about their interactions with each other based on their dispositions. OutC. the researchers considered that the capuchin monkeys might not have understood whether Person A was refusing Person B's requestThis is interesting, let's say monkeys understood that person A was unhelpful, then this is a supporter. However if they don't understand that person A was unhelpful, then we cannot say if they preferred person B because they were not unhelpful or some other reason. OutD. capuchin monkeys would accept food more often from Person B than from Person A in a similar experiment in which Person A and Person B did not interactThis suggests that monkeys might be favouring person B for some other factor - may be appearance, gender, smell, body language, etc. If they do prefer person B for any of these reasons then it does break the conclusion, else the conclusion holds.E. monkeys of some other species resemble capuchin monkeys in their responses to unhelpful individuals in similar experimental conditionsWe aren't concerned about other species. OutHope this was helpful!Suyash1331
In an experiment, capuchin monkeys watched Person A refuse Person B's request to help open a jar of food. Afterward, each monkey could select which of the two people to accept food from. The monkeys accepted food less often from the unhelpful person, Person A, than from Person B. The researchers concluded that capuchin monkeys generally prefer to avoid unhelpful individuals.
In order to evaluate the support provided for the researchers' conclusion, it would be most helpful to know whether
A. capuchin monkeys, in a second, similar experiment, conducted for comparison, watched Person A being helpful to Person B
B. capuchin monkeys with more-helpful dispositions are more likely than those with less-helpful dispositions to offer food to and accept food from other capuchin monkeys
C. the researchers considered that the capuchin monkeys might not have understood whether Person A was refusing Person B's request
D. capuchin monkeys would accept food more often from Person B than from Person A in a similar experiment in which Person A and Person B did not interact
E. monkeys of some other species resemble capuchin monkeys in their responses to unhelpful individuals in similar experimental conditions