It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 17:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 194

Kudos [?]: 385 [3], given: 886

Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2014, 11:35
3
This post received
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (01:08) correct 56% (01:07) wrong based on 557 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need to spend more heavily in the months ahead to beat back rivals for their own party’s nomination, or to introduce themselves to voters against Republicans who are already well-known.

A. nomination, or to introduce
B. nomination, introduce
C. nomination by introducing
D. nomination, and introducing
E. nomination through the introduction of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Kudos [?]: 385 [3], given: 886

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 194

Kudos [?]: 385 [0], given: 886

Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2014, 11:38
I got this question on veritasprep and got it wrong.
However I am confused if the original sentence maintains the correct parallel structure in sentence where " X or Y" structure is used.
I think that will need to introduce themselves should have been there to maintain the parallelism.
Experts , can you please guide us on this question.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Kudos [?]: 385 [0], given: 886

4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 194

Kudos [?]: 385 [4], given: 886

Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2014, 11:39
4
This post received
KUDOS
Posting the original answer that was given.

This confusing problem is a perfect example of how important logical meaning is in sentence correction. On your first read through, the original might seem awkward or incorrect, but it is the only sentence that conveys a logical meaning and has a correct grammatical structure. The sentence in (A), after the proper slash-and-burn is really: “The democratic challengers will need to spend more heavily TO DO THIS OR TO DO THAT.” Importantly those two things (the THIS and THAT) are very different and unrelated to each other (beat back their own rivals OR introduce themselves to voters in order to compete against well known candidates of the other party). (B) contains a clear structure error - you cannot say “challengers will need to spend….., introduce” - some type of connector would be required. (D) also contains a structural error as you cannot say “challengers will need to spend more heavily…and introducing” In (C) and (E), the structural issue is corrected but the sentences are entirely illogical: They are not going to beat back rivals of their OWN party “by introducing” or “through the introduction of themselves” themselves to voters against well known Republicans. These are clearly two separate things and these structures cannot be used to convey a logical meaning. Only (A) is correct and contains a proper structure that conveys a logical meaning.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Kudos [?]: 385 [4], given: 886

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 831

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 61

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2014, 12:05
the non underlined portion of this question does not make any sense !!
this construction "ahead to beat back rivals for their own party’s nomination" is hanging .bolded portion does not make any sense .in fact "their own party's" is very awkward .

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 61

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 532

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 606

Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2014, 08:40
Request to initiate a more detailed discussion on this one.
Regards.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 606

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2014
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 1

GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2014, 16:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need to spend more heavily in the months ahead to beat back rivals for their own party’s nomination, or to introduce themselves to voters against Republicans who are already well-known.

A. nomination, or to introduce

On first glance, I considered this a comma splice since "to introduce themselves to voters against Republicans who are already well-known" is not a complete thought.

B. nomination, introduce

This is most definitely a comma splice. Eliminate this one.

C. nomination by introducing

This was the one I was leaning toward at first because it is not a comma splice and it does not violate parallelism. However, I thought that this distorts the meaning of the original sentence. See choice E for the same reasoning. Eliminate this one too.

D. nomination, and introducing

Not parallel with "will need to spend." Eliminated.

E. nomination through the introduction of

This distorts the original meaning of the sentence. That is the democrat will either have "to spend" or "to introduce." Eliminated.

Kudos [?]: 13 [1], given: 1

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10131

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2016, 20:01
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7873 [1], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2016, 23:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
The problem with this question is that for an outsider, this will be a riddle. We do not know the significance of the reference to California and New York in particular. If it were the entire US, then we can understand that the elections were national. Secondly, looking from today’s perspective, this question may not be relevant. May be in 2008, Obama, then a new hand had to beat the more popular Hillary Clinton and prove to the voters that he was better than the Vietnam War hero McCain. Today, Hillary Clinton is much more remembered than any of her own party’s rivals for a variety of reasons and for that matter more than even the Republican aspirant Trump is. So, I wonder, whether this will be a logical theme for a GMAT question.
That aside, the problem as I see is that admittedly if there are two disparate reasons for which money has to be spent, why use the conjunction ‘or’ rather than ‘and’

Of course, A may be the best of the lot not by conviction but by compulsion.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509


Last edited by daagh on 29 Jun 2017, 05:01, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 7873 [1], given: 363

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 215

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 03:54
I'm confused between A and C. I could strike out B,D and E due to their awkward construction. C seems quite legit, however, isn't correct.
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2017
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 04:34
rekhabishop same is the case with me as well


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1069

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 532

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 07:25
Imo A
Meaning here is key .
Why the candidates of democratic will have to pay more in the coming months .
The reason can be 1) To secure nomination they have to beat rivals from their own party.
2) To introduce themselves to public against republican candidates.
These two steps are going to be expensive.
only option A makes sense in such a scenario.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 532

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 215

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 09:26
daagh wrote:
The problem with this question is that for an outsider, this will be a riddle. We do not know the significance of the reference to California and New York in particular. If it were the entire US, then we can understand that the elections were national. Secondly, looking from today’s perspective, this question may not be relevant. May be in 2008, Obama, then a new hand had to beat the more popular Hillary Clinton and prove to the voters that he was better than the Vietnam War hero McCain. Today, Hillary Clinton is much more remembered than any of her own party’s rivals for a variety of reasons and for that matter more than even the Republican aspirant Trump is. So, I wonder, whether this will be a logical theme for a GMAT question.
That aside, the problem as I see is that admittedly if there are two disparate reasons for which money has to be spent, why use the conjunction ‘or’ rather than ‘and’

Of course, A may be the best of the lot not by conviction but by compulsion.


daagh isn't C good enough too? I mean, gramatically.
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

Expert Post
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1109

Kudos [?]: 1170 [0], given: 29

Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 00:54
There's a meaning reason to choose "or" over "and": the idea is that a challenger may be trying to beat or unseat other Democrats, or they may be running unopposed against a Republican. It's not necessarily both. However, since the only choice with "and" (D) doesn't work grammatically, we don't need to worry about this, or to know anything about American politics. (By the way, while the GMAT would be unlikely to use this content, there's nothing particularly topical about this statement--it could be true in any election season.)

As for C, it implies that Democratic candidates will succeed against other Democrats by means of introducing themselves to the general voters who may vote Republican. These are two different steps of the process (securing the Democratic nomination and winning the general election against a Republican.) Then again, I'm a long-time California voter. If this isn't clear to everyone, then I'd say that this part does rely on political knowledge!
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1170 [0], given: 29

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 394

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 232

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2017, 19:56
In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need to spend more heavily in the months ahead to beat back rivals for their own party’s nomination, or to introduce themselves to voters against Republicans who are already well-known.

A. nomination, or to introduce
B. nomination, introduce
C. nomination by introducing
--> not intended meaning.
D. nomination, and introducing
E. nomination through the introduction of
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 232

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2017, 20:25
Nomination, and introducing... two separate tasks that in the context will make sense through the use of 'and' as a conjunction... D fits best

Sent from my GT-I9060I using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2017, 16:47
Quote:
A. nomination, or to introduce

On first glance, I considered this a comma splice since "to introduce themselves to voters against Republicans who are already well-known" is not a complete thought.


Isn't colorbrandon right that this is definitely a comma splice?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 136

Re: In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2017, 16:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In California and New York, Democratic challengers will need

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.