Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2016, 09:40
1
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
65% (hard)
Question Stats:
62% (01:42) correct 38% (01:29) wrong based on 424 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
B. The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
C. The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding
D. The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
Re: In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2016, 11:50
2
1
Vyshak wrote:
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
B. The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
C. The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding
D. The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
Straightaway (B)
lets deconstruct the stimulus -
Quote:
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention.However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
From the above stimulus we can find -
The Premises -
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer
Counter Premise -
However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary.
Conclusion -
.......in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
A. The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
B. The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument;the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
C. The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding
D. The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
So , IMHO (B) _________________
Thanks and Regards
Abhishek....
PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS
Re: In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2016, 21:27
Vyshak wrote:
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
B. The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
C. The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding
D. The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
A and D out - since Second part is not a conclusion. E out - First part is not conclusion C - links both the premises, which is not the correct. B - correct.
Re: In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2016, 13:53
rachitshah wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer. Presently, governments do not have a reliable way of determining whether the symptoms for which these patients were treated for would have otherwise subsided without medical attention. However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a premise that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that premise.
B. The first is a premise, of which the implications are in dispute in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that premise.
C. The first is a finding, the accuracy of which is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish the accuracy of the finding
D. The first is a premise that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion that rests upon further evidence within the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge by the government, visits per capita to the doctor are twice as frequent as they are in countries where healthcare is paid at least partly out-of-pocket by the consumer Alternatively, in those countries where healthcare is not free, consumers often forego visits to the doctor except in cases of severe symptoms.
A and D out - since Second part is not a conclusion. E out - First part is not conclusion C - links both the premises, which is not the correct. B - correct.
How is it that the second bolded portion of the argument is the conclusion. How is this an opinion? Isn't the sentence before the second bolded portion the author's opinion? " However, this information does not warrant the conclusion by some universal healthcare critics that in the countries with a higher frequency of doctor visits, about half of them are unnecessary. "
Re: In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2016, 00:48
1
thehealthcareguy, I don't think anyone is saying that the second bold is the conclusion. It certainly isn't!
However, we shouldn't be studying this problem at all. Someone has just taken an official GMAT question, scrambled the order of the answers, and written a new stimulus that doesn't fit the answers properly. Take a look at the real thing and you'll learn much more:
Re: In countries where healthcare is universal and provided free of charge
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Dec 2018, 14:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
62% (01:42) correct 
