aarushisingla
Hi,
I did not understand how A undermines the conclusion. So, Could you please explain it?
Hello,
aarushisingla. I would be happy to offer my thoughts to assist you and the community at large. As you have already touched on, the question asks us to
undermine or
weaken something, but that something is specifically
the defense offered by the dean. Thus, we must first figure out
exactly what the grounds may be for this defense. Only then can we dismantle it. Let us jump into the passage.
vikasp99
In defending the Hyperion School of Journalism from charges that its program is of little or no value to its students, the dean of the school pointed to this recent success in placing students: 65 percent of its graduates went on to internships or jobs in print or broadcast journalism.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the defense offered by the dean?
Okay, so the defense is against
charges that [the Hyperion School of Journalism] program is of little or no value to its students. I emphasize the last part because the charges address benefits to students, and the dean speaks to this point exactly: the
recent success in placing students. The number he cites indicates that that percent of
graduates went on to internships or jobs in print or broadcast journalism. Again, I emphasize the evidence cited because in CR, to put a dent in an argument, it is crucial to stick to the
exact phrasing of the premise(s) or conclusion from the passage. Otherwise, you risk getting ensnared in the not-so-linear logic of a tricky answer choice or two, and you will likely resort to guessing. What do the answer choices have in store for us?
vikasp99
(A) More than half of the school’s students came from jobs in journalism to improve their skills.
Analysis: If the majority of students have come from
jobs in journalism already, then the dean, by dredging up job placement statistics in
journalism in particular seems, well, like a sleight-of-hand. It would be akin to starting a school for the gifted and then citing statistics on the number of graduates who became members of MENSA. No duh, right? Getting back to the question at hand, the force of the evidence cited by the dean is certainly undermined when this new information comes to light. This is what we are looking for.
Green light.vikasp99
(B) Some newspaper editors do not regard journalism school as a necessary part of the training of a journalist.
Analysis: Ah, the
some trap. What does that mean? Two newspaper editors? Five hundred? Would it even matter? The dean does not appeal to evidence on the esteem in which
newspaper editors hold the program, so this answer choice does not undermine anything in the passage.
Red light.vikasp99
(C) The number of cities with more than one major newspaper has declined sharply over the last 25 years.
Analysis: We are not interested in these
cities, nor do we care whether they publish one, two, or twenty-five major newspapers. The dean did NOT mention where the graduates were being placed within the blanket term
print or broadcast journalism, a fact that might make this new information pertinent.
Red light.vikasp99
(D) The program offered by the Hyperion School of Journalism is similar in quality and content to those offered by its peer institutions.
Analysis: The dean does not invoke a comparison to
peer institutions; such a consideration is irrelevant to the passage. And if Hyperion School of Journalism
were equal to other journalism schools, but none of them offered much value to their students, then what then? The criticism would be perfectly intact.
Red light.vikasp99
(E) The proportion of applicants to the Hyperion School of Journalism that are admitted is lower than it was the years ago.
Analysis: Admissions statistics are another outside-of-scope consideration. If you find yourself wanting to justify the reasoning that this answer choice indicates that the applicants are of a higher quality now than they were
years ago, then so what? What does this say about their education at Hyperion being of value? Nothing, nothing at all.
Red light.In short, read the question and passage carefully and keep your reasoning as close as possible to the logic presented in the passage. Like produces like, and the clear winner among the answer choices here is (A). If anyone has further questions, I would be happy to help out.
Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew