Bunuel
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades to the samurai class alone.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
1. According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:
(A) Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
(B) Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
(C) Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
(D) The samurai class issued sumptuary laws to maintain their distinction from commoners and merchants.
(E) By sponsoring public events like kabuki theater, merchants gained privileges previously reserved for the samurai class.
2. According to the passage, the primary intended function of the sumptuary laws passed during the Edo period in Japan was to
(A) prevent the rising merchant class from overtaking the samurai economically
(B) reinforce the visual and material distinctions that upheld the class hierarchy
(C) encourage artisans and textile producers to focus on creating simpler, affordable garments for the lower classes
(D) limit the influence of cultural activities such as kabuki theater and tea ceremonies
(E) ensure that the symbols of wealth were distributed in accordance with social rank and merit
3. The passage most likely mentions the regulation of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades during the Edo period in order to provide evidence of
(A) the samurai class’s concern over the diminishing effectiveness of sumptuary laws in preserving social distinctions
(B) to ensure that luxury production remained concentrated in the hands of the samurai
(C) the influence of cultural practices like kabuki theater in driving demand for luxury garments
(D) to ensure the samurai’s continued dominance by preventing the lower classes from appearing wealthier than they were
(E) to manage the limited availability of luxury materials, ensuring that they remained symbols of rank rather than common commodities
4. Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:
(A) Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
(B) Wealthy merchants in Edo Japan increasingly adopted luxurious clothing, challenging established social norms.
(C) The erosion of hereditary privilege and rise of economic power contributed to the collapse of the class-based dress system.
(D) Merchants’ attempts to emulate the samurai were largely ineffective in influencing the broader social hierarchy.
(E) The Meiji Restoration marked a formal shift away from sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
Official Solution:1. According to the passage, each of the following is true of some period in Edo-period Japan EXCEPT:(A) Wealthy merchants gradually undermined class distinctions by adopting luxurious clothing.
(B) Sumptuary laws regulated the use of fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve social hierarchy.
(C) Economic power began to outweigh hereditary status by the mid-19th century.
(D) The samurai class issued sumptuary laws to maintain their distinction from commoners and merchants.
(E) By sponsoring public events like kabuki theater, merchants gained privileges previously reserved for the samurai class.
A) Incorrect: The passage explicitly discusses how merchants’ affluence allowed them to adopt luxurious clothing, which challenged the samurai’s social distinction.
B) Incorrect: Sumptuary laws are described as mechanisms for preserving class hierarchy by limiting luxurious attire to the samurai class.C) Incorrect: The passage highlights how economic influence began to surpass hereditary privilege by the mid-19th century, contributing to the decline of the feudal order.D) Incorrect: The samurai’s repeated issuance of sumptuary laws to preserve their status from wealthy merchants is directly referenced.E) Correct: While merchants sponsored kabuki and other cultural events, the passage does not indicate that this led to privileges comparable to those of the samurai. Their actions challenged the class structure but did not result in formal elevation of status. This option subtly misrepresents the relationship between merchants and the samurai class.2. According to the passage, the primary intended function of the sumptuary laws passed during the Edo period in Japan was to(A) prevent the rising merchant class from overtaking the samurai economically
(B) reinforce the visual and material distinctions that upheld the class hierarchy
(C) encourage artisans and textile producers to focus on creating simpler, affordable garments for the lower classes
(D) limit the influence of cultural activities such as kabuki theater and tea ceremonies
(E) ensure that the symbols of wealth were distributed in accordance with social rank and merit
A) Incorrect: While merchants’ economic rise challenged the samurai, the laws aimed at preserving social distinctions, not preventing economic shifts directly.B) Correct: The passage explicitly states that sumptuary laws controlled fabrics, colors, and patterns to maintain the visual and material markers of class hierarchy. This was their primary function.C) Incorrect: This option subtly misrepresents the intent by suggesting the laws aimed to promote simpler garments for lower classes, whereas the focus was on restricting luxury to preserve social divisions.D) Incorrect: Although merchants participated in cultural events, the passage does not suggest that sumptuary laws directly targeted such activities. The focus was on clothing and material displays of status.E) Incorrect: This option implies a fairer distribution of wealth symbols across ranks, but the laws were designed to restrict luxury to the samurai, reinforcing class boundaries rather than distributing wealth by merit. 3. The passage most likely mentions the regulation of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades during the Edo period in order to provide evidence of(A) the samurai class’s concern over the diminishing effectiveness of sumptuary laws in preserving social distinctions
(B) to ensure that luxury production remained concentrated in the hands of the samurai
(C) the influence of cultural practices like kabuki theater in driving demand for luxury garments
(D) to ensure the samurai’s continued dominance by preventing the lower classes from appearing wealthier than they were
(E) to manage the limited availability of luxury materials, ensuring that they remained symbols of rank rather than common commodities
A) Correct: The passage highlights how the samurai issued increasingly detailed sumptuary laws to maintain their exclusivity as merchants grew wealthier. This reflects the samurai’s anxiety over preserving class distinctions.B) Incorrect: Although sumptuary laws aimed to reinforce samurai privilege, the passage does not suggest that they were designed to control luxury production directly. The focus was on restricting who could wear luxury items, not who could produce them.C) Incorrect: While cultural practices like kabuki are mentioned, the regulations targeted clothing and luxury materials, not demand driven by cultural events. This option introduces an incorrect causal link.D) Incorrect: This misrepresents the focus of the sumptuary laws by shifting the emphasis to lower classes, while the passage indicates the real concern was wealthy merchants, not the broader lower class.E) Incorrect: This subtly misrepresents the intent by implying scarcity motivated the laws, whereas the passage emphasizes that exclusivity, not resource management, was the goal. 4. Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:(A) Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
(B) Wealthy merchants in Edo Japan increasingly adopted luxurious clothing, challenging established social norms.
(C) The erosion of hereditary privilege and rise of economic power contributed to the collapse of the class-based dress system.
(D) Merchants’ attempts to emulate the samurai were largely ineffective in influencing the broader social hierarchy.
(E) The Meiji Restoration marked a formal shift away from sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
A) Incorrect: The passage explicitly mentions that sumptuary laws regulated fabrics, colors, and patterns to preserve class distinctions.B) Incorrect: The passage discusses how merchants’ wealth allowed them to adopt luxurious attire, challenging the samurai’s exclusive social privileges.C) Incorrect: The shift from hereditary privilege to economic influence is a key point in the passage, leading to the decline of the sumptuary system.D) Correct: The passage emphasizes that merchants’ emulation of samurai dress and luxury did, in fact, undermine the class system over time, contributing to its erosion. This option misrepresents the effectiveness of merchant influence.E) Incorrect: The Meiji Restoration is directly cited as marking the end of sumptuary laws and class-based clothing regulations.