Kritesh
Could you explain me the answer choices of Questions 3 and 4.
My answers are B and C/E(I was confused between these two options) , but the OA is D and B .
mikemcgarry Warm regards ,
Kritesh Singh
Dear
KriteshI'm happy to help.
The first paragraph tells us about this researcher Wulf and her claim that the anti-marriage poetry these educated young women wrote was so influential.
In the second paragraph is skeptical about Wulf's claims for a several reasons. One is that folks would have to be at a certain literacy level to read this poetry, and only a small percentage of the lower-class women would have been at that level.
3) The author of the passage implies which of the following about the poetry mentioned in the first paragraph?
B. The circulation of the poetry was confined to young Quaker women.This is a little too extreme.
Some of the lower-class women could read it, just not many of them.
D. The poetry’s capacity to influence popular attitudes was restricted by the degree of literacy necessary to comprehend it.Absolutely! This poetry didn't influence a large number of people because many people didn't have the skills to read it.
For question #3, OA =
(D) 4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the author’s basis for saying that Wulf overstates Quaker schools’ impact (line 17-18) ?
B. Most poor, non-Quaker students enrolled in Quaker schools had completed one or two years’ formal or informal schooling before enrolling.The author's argument hinges on the fact that most students did not have enough schooling to achieve the literacy level necessary to read the poetry. Well, if folks always studied a couple years before coming to the Quaker school, then all of the students who completed just one year at the Quaker school would have three years of literacy--thus, the impact of this poetry would be more widespread. This is a devastating objection to the author's argument.
C. Not all of the young women whose commonplace books contained copies of poetry critical of marriage were Quakers.It seems both Quakers and non-Quakers were in that school, so as along as everyone was interacting in one place, it doesn't matter who was Quaker and who wasn't.
E. In 1765 an unusually large proportion of the Quaker schools’ student body consisted of poor girls from non-Quaker backgrounds.In a way, this strengthens the author's argument. If, say, 90% of the the students were poor girls with low literacy skills, then close to 90% of the students wouldn't have been able to read the poetry. Thus, the poetry's influence would not have been widespread. This strengthen's the author's argument and question #4 is asking for a weakener.
For question #4, OA =
(B) Does all this make sense?
Mike