Sajjad1994
In his testimony,
Eugene Debs asserted that the Espionage Law, which had abridged free speech, was a violation of the Constitution.
(A) Eugene Debs asserted that the Espionage Law, which
(B) it was asserted by Eugene Debs that the Espionage Law that
(C) Eugene Debs asserting that the Espionage Law, which
(D) Eugene Debs having asserted that the Espionage Law, which
(E) Eugene Debs asserted that the Espionage Law that
A) Eugene Debs asserted that the Espionage Law, which -
CORRECT(B) it was asserted by Eugene Debs that the Espionage Law that -
it has no clear antecedent- INCORRECT
(C) Eugene Debs asserting that the Espionage Law, which - "
Asserting" - wrong usage of continuous tense -since the action is not happening now - INCORRECT
(D) Eugene Debs having asserted that the Espionage Law, which - "
having asserted" - Seems like a run-on - INCORRECT
(E) Eugene Debs asserted that the Espionage Law that[/quote]- this is same as A only difference is the use of
that , that is used as restrictive modifier which is not required since we are providing extra information regarding Espionage Law. Main focus is - "
the Law was violation of constitution"
For extra info -
which is solving the purpose.