GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2018, 00:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 848
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2015, 07:36
3
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

27% (01:39) correct 73% (01:45) wrong based on 523 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, stressed the importance of an organism's interaction with the physical world.


A. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence,

B. Arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics,

C. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence

D. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics argued against its emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence

E. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, in which he argues against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks

_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2014
Posts: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2015, 08:56
IMO E
a tough one indeed, not easy to spot error right away, but then POE comes handy in such situations.

A- -ing modifier error as the arguing doesn't seem to correctly refer to the main subject- looks more of a run-on sentence with incorrect commas
B- modifier error again
C-Incorrect comma placements creating run-on situation
D-Pronoun ambiguity its...and meaning change
E- Though pretty wordy, it emerges as the least erroneous sentence among the other choices
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 43
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2015, 03:06
reto wrote:
In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, stressed the importance of an organism's interaction with the physical world.

A. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence,
B. Arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics,
C. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence
D. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics argued against its emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence
E. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, in which he argues against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks


What is wrong with answer choices A & B?

Reto,

I thought that the participial phrase - modifier - can be placed anywhere in the sentence as long as it is properly enclosed by a set of commas in the beginning and in the end!

Although in B, one might get a sense that - Rodney Brooks is generally arguing against the emphasis on .........and that he doesn't argue specifically in his writing. However, answer choice A, I believe, aptly corrects this sense.

Apparently, there is something wrong with the above?

Would appreciate your assistance!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 466
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2015, 02:42
1
I selected A over E.
Below is the OE for A from Economist gmat site

Quote:
Certain advanced Sentence Correction questions focus more on issues of style and sentence structure than on grammar. In this type of question, stylistic flaws and poorly constructed sentences are more common than grammatical mistakes.

In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

While this answer choice is grammatically correct, it is stylistically flawed. Placing one modifier before the subject and the other modifier after the subject creates an interruption in the flow of the sentence that is confusing. Look for an answer choice that places these two statements together.

OE for E:
In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

This answer choice corrects the original stylistic flaw and achieves greater clarity by turning one of the modifiers into a relative clause (in which he argues, etc.) to accurately indicate the connection between the two modifiers.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 43
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 28 May 2015, 07:35
JarvisR wrote:
I selected A over E.
Below is the OE for A from Economist gmat site

Quote:
Certain advanced Sentence Correction questions focus more on issues of style and sentence structure than on grammar. In this type of question, stylistic flaws and poorly constructed sentences are more common than grammatical mistakes.

In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

While this answer choice is grammatically correct, it is stylistically flawed. Placing one modifier before the subject and the other modifier after the subject creates an interruption in the flow of the sentence that is confusing. Look for an answer choice that places these two statements together.

OE for E:
In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

This answer choice corrects the original stylistic flaw and achieves greater clarity by turning one of the modifiers into a relative clause (in which he argues, etc.) to accurately indicate the connection between the two modifiers.


Hello Jarvis
I agree with the explanation. Although I found it very hard to digest when I attempted this question yesterday, another question has made it clear that - Advanced GMAT questions test one's ability to put answer in more direct possible way, apart from the grammar.

Here, take a look at this question - although-blue-herons-can-still-be-found-along-the-maine-144115.html

I chose E, and even though E is grammatically correct, the answer is apparently C!

Learnt it hard way! :)
Cheers!

Originally posted by pavankarwa123 on 27 May 2015, 04:15.
Last edited by pavankarwa123 on 28 May 2015, 07:35, edited 1 time in total.
Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 393
Reviews Badge
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2015, 21:12
Hi,

Could someone pls explain what is the modifier error in option B?

According to option B: Arguing rightly refers to Rodney Brooks....while as per option E Rodney's writings are arguing which I feel is incorrect...

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Regards,
Dom
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2014
Posts: 41
Schools: Olin '18 (S)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2015, 22:10
Hii,

I prefer E is correct.

Reason: Main subject Rodney Brooks is placed right before the main verb stressed.GMAT prefers such construction.

Have a look on this official questn
Beatrix potter,in her book illustrations,carefully coordinating them with her narratives,capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.

Structure: Main subject, Modifier1, Modifier2, Main verb............

Now correct answer:
In her book illustrations,which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix potter capitalized on blah blah blah.

Hope this helps
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3622
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 06:53
1
Good question. So, bumping it.

As per the meaning of the sentence, Rodney brooks wrote something in which he argued about something else and then he stressed another thing.

If this meaning is clear, it is very easy to find the error.

A. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Looks like He stressed in his writings but argued somewhere else.
B. Arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics, Same as A
C. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics, arguing against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence : Again, same as A and too many modifiers connected together.
D. Rodney Brooks, in his writings on evolutionary robotics argued against its emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence: It looks like robotics argued against something. Change in meaning. Hence, incorrect
E. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, in which he argues against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks: Correct answer
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Check our new About Us Page here.

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 11:24
Top Contributor
E. In his writings on evolutionary robotics, in which he argues against the emphasis on symbolic processing as a model of artificial intelligence, Rodney Brooks

In E, the supposedly correct choice, I am perplexed as to what this style is called wherein one the same author, in the same writing, at the same time, discussing two topics that occur at the same time argues in the present tense for one factor in the subordinate clause and stressed the importance of the other in the past tense in the main clause!
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Oct 2016
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
WE: Research (Health Care)
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2017, 21:33
How to approach questions like this?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2017, 02:56
Top Contributor
Quote

Quote:
Below is the OE for A from Economist GMAT
Certain advanced Sentence Correction questions focus more on issues of style and sentence structure than on grammar. In this type of question, stylistic flaws and poorly constructed sentences are more common than grammatical mistakes.

In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject, Rodney Brooks:
In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

While this answer choice is grammatically correct, it is stylistically flawed. Placing one modifier before the subject and the other modifier after the subject creates an interruption in the flow of the sentence that is confusing. Look for an answer choice that places these two statements together.
OE for E:
In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject, Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

This answer choice corrects the original stylistic flaw and achieves greater clarity by turning one of the modifiers into a relative clause (in which he argues, etc.) to accurately indicate the connection between the two modifiers.


The idea that the correct choice in some advanced SC issues is decided more on style such as those mentioned in their OE is debatable.
It may be seen from the given Official examples that this is not an issue as far as GMAT is concerned. There must be some stronger reasons for rejecting the choices than such trivial phenomena


In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

Ans: A


Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,
Ans: A

in 1995 Richard Stallman, a well-known critic of the patent system, testified in Patent Office hearings that, to test the system, a colleague of his had managed to win a patent for one of Kirchhoff's laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and now included in virtually every textbook of elementary physics.


A . laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and

B. laws, which was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and it is

C. laws, namely, it was an observation about electric current first made in 1845 and

D. laws, an observation about electric current first made in 1845, it is

E .laws that was an observation about electric current first made in 1845, and is

Ans: A.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Human Resources
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2017, 07:12
JarvisR wrote:
I selected A over E.
Below is the OE for A from Economist gmat site

Quote:
Certain advanced Sentence Correction questions focus more on issues of style and sentence structure than on grammar. In this type of question, stylistic flaws and poorly constructed sentences are more common than grammatical mistakes.

In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

While this answer choice is grammatically correct, it is stylistically flawed. Placing one modifier before the subject and the other modifier after the subject creates an interruption in the flow of the sentence that is confusing. Look for an answer choice that places these two statements together.

OE for E:
In this sentence, two modifiers modify the subject Rodney Brooks:

In his writings on evolutionary robotics
arguing against the emphasis ...
Note that these modifiers are related because Brooks makes his argument in his writings.

This answer choice corrects the original stylistic flaw and achieves greater clarity by turning one of the modifiers into a relative clause (in which he argues, etc.) to accurately indicate the connection between the two modifiers.


Adhering to the rules, Option C also seems to be correct.
Both the modifiers are placed one after the other.
Experts, pl inform why Option C is incorrect.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again &nbs [#permalink] 02 Dec 2017, 07:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In his writings on evolutionary robotics, Rodney Brooks, arguing again

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.