Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 14:12 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 14:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32838 [14]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2020
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32838 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 20 Apr 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Schools: Fisher (A)
GRE 1: Q163 V157
GPA: 3.05
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Sajjad1994 wrote:
sidharth2412 wrote:
Please someone give the mapping of the passage.
Questions are quite difficult to understand


Passage summary


The Topic is Latin writing during the English Renaissance, and the Scope is its underappreciated importance to that period. To explain that lack of appreciation is the author’s Purpose, and the explanation is the Main Idea: For various reasons, scholars have failed to pick up on the importance of Latin. OK. Now let’s chart how the author gets to all of that.

Paragraph 1 begins by touting Latin writing as the expression of the highest form of English thought during the Renaissance. Starting with “However” (line 11), the author shifts gears to his real complaint—or rather, his complaint as articulated by Binns; this is a “book review” passage in which our reviewer is 100% behind Binns’s views.

Scholars simply don’t appreciate the depth, breadth, and importance of English writing in Latin. Why not? Each para indicts a different group of scholars. Paragraph 1 explains that because “academic specializations don’t overlap,” Latin classicists stick to “humanistic and literary writings,” and leave the truly great scientific and theological stuff to scholars who can’t read the Latin!

Paragraph 2 explores the deficiencies of intellectual historians—the ones who do study theology and science, but who concentrate on translations from the Latin and fail to appreciate Latin’s true nuances and influences back in the 1500’s-1600’s.

Paragraph 3 somewhat validates Paragraph 1’s classicists (they’re not trained to deal with scientific issues) and Paragraph 2’s intellectual historians (they can’t read the Latin), but still complains that each side has contributed to a distorted view of Renaissance England.


Kindly explain question 6 and 7.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32838 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


6. The information in the passage suggests which one of the following concerning late-Renaissance scientific works written in Latin?

Difficulty Level: 600-650

Explanation

“Late-Renaissance scientific works written in Latin” are Hot Words directing you to line 52. The entire sentence (lines 50-55) asserts that late Renaissance science is “difficult” and that scholars lack the training to deal with it. That’s (C).

“Easier” (A)? Hardly. No “illuminating commentaries” (B) on scientific writing are alluded to. Lines 42-46 suggest that the core of contemporary English university study was the literature and the humanities, not science (D). 3As for (E), the context of the entire sentence in lines 50-55 suggests that these writers were in fact English rather than Continental.

Answer: C
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32838 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Explanation


7. The author of the passage mentions the poet Milton and the scientist Newton primarily in order to

Difficulty Level: 650-700

Explanation

The contrast between Milton and Newton in lines 22-27 comes at the end of a subsection that begins at line 17. The idea is that scholars of Latin have done tons of analysis of literary figures (like Milton) but woefully at sea when dealing with a man of science (like Newton). The gist of all that comes in (E).

(A)’s suggestion that the two men illustrate a “range” ignores the sharp contrast in the structure of lines 22-27; in fact, it’s the passage as a whole that “illustrates the range” of Renaissance Latin writing. Scholarly “attitudes” (B) is nowhere alluded to in the passage at all, let alone lines 22-27.

You don’t have to know from your general knowledge that Milton and Newton were both Englishmen to recognize that an England vs. Continent comparison (C) is not alluded to at this point in the text.

(D) offers an incorrect contrast between the men, and also seems to think that Newton was a literary writer when the passage makes clear he was a scientist.

Answer: E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Can someone explain what is the difference between Option A & B of Q.2?

I am unable to find why one is wrong and other is right. Aren't they both correct? Since they both represent the intellectual historians? Isn't it? Or are they representing language specialists? In either case, I am not able to make sense of it.

Regards
Vighnesh
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32838 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Expert Reply
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
Can someone explain what is the difference between Option A & B of Q.2?

I am unable to find why one is wrong and other is right. Aren't they both correct? Since they both represent the intellectual historians? Isn't it? Or are they representing language specialists? In either case, I am not able to make sense of it.

Regards
Vighnesh


Official Explanation


2. The passage contains support for which one of the following statements concerning those scholars who analyze works written in Latin during the Renaissance?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

The scope of the question is broad enough to encompass either paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, and happily, there’s support for the correct answer (B) in both places. Again and again, the author asserts that “philological training” (line 22) is needed and that scholars “underestimate” (line 35) and “ignore” (line 37) the influence of Latin on Renaissance culture. Those are the two necessary conditions to which (B) refers.

(A) distorts the scholars’ Latin weaknesses into a broader “lack of training,” and treats their reliance on English translation as a result (of scholars’ deficiency) rather than as a cause (of their misunderstanding of Latin’s importance).

(C) is a 180: The scholars studying literature are actually quite capable of understanding Latin (lines 14-18).

(D) is a 180 of a different sort, accusing legal and scientific texts of getting too much attention rather than too little.

(E) is completely wrong, since the trio of writers “all…wrote in English” (line 4).

Answer: B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2021
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 82 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Send PM
In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
2
Kudos
QUESTION 1

Quote:
1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?


Quote:
(A) Analyses of the scientific, theological, and legal writings of the Renaissance have proved to be more important to an understanding of the period than have studies of humanistic and literary works.

Incorrect. The author nowhere mentions that the scientific, theological, and legal writings are MORE important to the understanding of the Renaissance. All that author mentions is that this is also important to the understanding and it has been neglected.
Quote:
(B) The English works of such Renaissance writers as Shakespeare, Marlowe, and Sidney have been overemphasized at the expense of these writers’ more intellectually challenging Latin works.

Incorrect.First of all, the author just mentions these three writers to give examples of the works and the writers that have often represented the Renaissance period. Second, these writers wrote in English. Nowhere the author mentions the latin works of these authors.
Quote:
(C) Though traditionally recognized as the language of the educated classes of the Renaissance, Latin has until recently been studied primarily in connection with ancient Roman texts.

Incorrect. Okay, so when we solve the main point question we should ask ourselves, "Was this the author's purpose for writing this passage?" and clearly, the answer to this would be no. Latin might have been studied primarily in connection with ancient Roman texts but that is not what the author is focusing on.
Quote:
(D) Many Latin texts by English Renaissance writers, though analyzed in depth by literary critics and philologists, have been all but ignored by historians of science and theology.

Incorrect. This is clearly a wrong answer because the author clearly mentions that even the literary critics and philologists didn't do an in depth analysis as they missed out on the Scientific and Theological works in Latin that would also contribute to our understanding of the Renaissance.
Quote:
(E) Many Latin texts by English Renaissance writers, though important to an analysis of the period, have been insufficiently understood for reasons related to academic specialization.

Correct! This is exactly why the author has written this passage. In the last paragraph, the author understands the challenges faced by both Latin language specialists and the historians of Renaissance England and admits that the neglect has happened due to challenges related to academic specialization but still reiterates that this has caused us to have an insufficient understanding of the Renaissance period.


QUESTION 2

Quote:
2. The passage contains support for which one of the following statements concerning those scholars who analyze works written in Latin during the Renaissance?


According to the question stem, we want to talk about the scholars who analyze works written in Latin during the Renaissance. This has been discussed in paragraph 1.

Quote:
(A) These scholars tend to lack training both in language and in intellectual history, and thus base their interpretations of Renaissance culture on works translated into English.

Incorrect. "Works translated into English" was not even talked about in paragraph 1.
Quote:
(B) These scholars tend to lack the combination of training in both language and intellectual history that is necessary for a proper study of important and neglected Latin texts.

Correct! The support for this is present in the last line of the first paragraph. This option also mentions "lack the combination of training in both language and intellectual history" which in my opinion goes back to this "but little or none when confronting the more alien and difficult terminology, syntax, and content of the scientist Newton.".
Quote:
(C) Specialists in such literary forms as poems and orations too frequently lack training in the Latin language that was written and studied during the Renaissance.

Incorrect. In the first paragraph, this is not mentioned. In fact, the first paragraph says that the language specialists were adept at analyzing the "humanistic and literary writings".
Quote:
(D) Language specialists have surveyed in too great detail important works of law and medicine, and thus have not provided a coherent interpretation of early modern English culture.

Incorrect. This is obviously wrong. This is the opposite of what is written. The language specialists have missed out on important works of law and medicine.
Quote:
(E) Scholars who analyze important Latin works by such writers as Marlowe, Shakespeare, and Sidney too often lack the historical knowledge of Latin necessary for a proper interpretation of early modern English culture.

Incorrect. This again is wrong. The three writers were mentioned because they wrote in English and not Latin.

QUESTION 3

Quote:
3. Which one of the following statements concerning the relationship between English and Continental writers of the Renaissance era can be inferred from the passage?


For this question, we need to go back to paragraph 2.
Quote:
(A) Continental writers wrote in Latin more frequently than did English writers, and thus rendered some of the most important Continental works inaccessible to English readers.

Incorrect. We haven't been given any such comparison about how frequently Continental writers wrote in Latin compared to English writers.
Quote:
(B) Continental writers, more intellectually advanced than their English counterparts, were on the whole responsible for familiarizing English audiences with Latin language and literature.

Incorrect. "more intellectually advanced" --> This is a controversial statement and an option like will most probably not be right. Also, "were on the whole responsible for familiarizing English audiences with Latin language and literature" is a bit too extreme.
Quote:
(C) English and Continental writers communicated their intellectual concerns, which were for the most part different, by way of works written in Latin.

Incorrect. "which were for the most part different"--> There is no support for this statement. The author doesn't say that the intellectual concerns were "different" but that what was recorded in Latin was of great importance.
Quote:
(D) The intellectual ties between English and Continental writers were stronger than has been acknowledged by many scholars and were founded on a mutual knowledge of Latin.

Correct! This can be inferred from the lines "Binns argues that these scholars treat the English-language writings of Renaissance England as an autonomous and coherent whole, underestimating the influence on English writers of their counterparts on the European Continent. In so doing they ignore the fact that English intellectuals were educated in schools and universities where they spoke and wrote Latin, and inhabited as adults an intellectual world in which what happened abroad and was recorded in Latin was of great importance."
Quote:
(E) The intellectual ties between English and Continental writers have been overemphasized in modern scholarship due to a lack of dialogue between language specialists and intellectual historians.

Incorrect. This again is an opposite answer. The intellectual ties between English and Continental writers have not been overemphasized but instead, this was missed out on by the scholars who study the works translated from Latin to English.

QUESTION 4

Quote:
4. The author of the passage most likely cites Shakespeare, Marlowe, and Sidney in the first paragraph as examples of writers whose


The support for this answer is provided in the first line of the passage in paragraph 1.
Quote:
(A) nonfiction works are less well known than their imaginative works

Incorrect. There is no mention of nonfiction vs imaginative works.
Quote:
(B) works have unfairly been credited with revolutionizing Western thought

Incorrect. Nowhere the author mentions that these have been "unfairly credited".
Quote:
(C) works have been treated as an autonomous and coherent whole

Incorrect. This is not why the author has cited these particular writers. Also, this wasn't said for the works of these three writers.
Quote:
(D) works have traditionally been seen as representing the high culture of Renaissance England

Correct! This is exactly what we're looking for. The author mentions in the first line very clearly that these works have always been seen as representing the high culture of Renaissance England.
Quote:
(E) Latin writings have, according to Binns, been overlooked

Incorrect. These works were written in English and weren't overlooked but instead have always been representing the Renaissance England.


QUESTION 5

Quote:
5. Binns would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements concerning the English language writings of Renaissance England traditionally studied by intellectual historians?


The support for this would be provided in paragraph 2.
Quote:
(A) These writings have unfortunately been undervalued by Latin-language specialists because of their nonliterary subject matter.

Incorrect. This has not been mentioned anywhere in the passage. All we know is that the Latin language specialists didn't analyse non literary subject matter in latin. The author never says that they undervalued the English language writings of non literary subject matter.
Quote:
(B) These writings, according to Latin-language specialists, had very little influence on the intellectual upheavals associated with the Renaissance.

Incorrect. Opinion of Latin Language specialists on the English language writings of Renaissance England is not given in the passage so this cannot be concluded.
Quote:
(C) These writings, as analyzed by intellectual historians, have formed the basis of a superficially coherent reading of the intellectual culture that produced them.

Correct! This can be inferred from "Binns argues that these scholars treat the English-language writings of Renaissance England as an autonomous and coherent whole, underestimating the influence on English writers of their counterparts on the European Continent."
Quote:
(D) These writings have been compared unfavorably by intellectual historians with Continental works of the same period.

Incorrect. Such comparison is not mentioned in the passage.
Quote:
(E) These writings need to be studied separately, according to intellectual historians, from Latin-language writings of the same period.

Incorrect. Opinion of intellectual historians is not mentioned in the passage either.


QUESTION 6
Quote:
6. The information in the passage suggests which one of the following concerning late-Renaissance scientific works written in Latin?


Quote:
(A) These works are easier for modern scholars to analyze than are theological works of the same era.

Incorrect. No such inference can be made. Both the scientific and theological works are difficult to analyze as not much analysis has been done on them but we cannot comment on the relative difficulty or ease of the analysis as nothing is given about that.
Quote:
(B) These works have seldom been translated into English and thus remain inscrutable to modern scholars, despite the availability of illuminating commentaries.

Incorrect. "thus remain inscrutable" is a bit extreme.
Quote:
(C) These works are difficult for modern scholars to analyze both because of the concepts they develop and the language in which they are written.

Correct! The support for this can be found in the last line of the 1st paragraph. "The intellectual historian can find ample guidance when reading the Latin poetry of Milton, but little or none when confronting the more alien and difficult terminology, syntax, and content of the scientist Newton."
Quote:
(D) These works constituted the core of an English university education during the Renaissance.

Incorrect. No such inference can be made. Nothing is said about the "English university education during the Renaissance".
Quote:
(E) These works were written mostly by Continental writers and reached English intellectuals only in English translation.

Incorrect. There is no support for the extreme "reached English intellectuals only in English translation".


QUESTION 7
Quote:
7. The author of the passage mentions the poet Milton and the scientist Newton primarily in order to


This is clear from the last line of the 1st paragraph.
Quote:
(A) illustrate the range of difficulty in Renaissance Latin writing, from relatively straightforward to very difficult

Incorrect. This is not the reason why the author mentions the poet and the scientist. Instead, the author wants to show that ample of analysis is done for Milton's poetry but not much guidance is available for Newton's work as the Latin language specialists only focused on the literary writings of the time.
Quote:
(B) illustrate the differing scholarly attitudes toward Renaissance writers who wrote in Latin and those who wrote in English

Incorrect. No, for the poet and for the scientist we're talking about the works in Latin only, not in English.
Quote:
(C) illustrate the fact that the concerns of English writers of the Renaissance differed from the concerns of their Continental counterparts

Incorrect. This is not even mentioned anywhere in paragraph 1 where the author talks about the poet and the scientist.
Quote:
(D) contrast a writer of the Renaissance whose merit has long been recognized with one whose literary worth has only recently begun to be appreciated

Incorrect. "whose literary worth has only recently begun to be appreciated" --> no support is found for this.
Quote:
(E) contrast a writer whose Latin writings have been the subject of illuminating scholarship with one whose Latin writings have been neglected by philologists

Correct! Philologists are the literary language specialists. So this is correct.


QUESTION 8

Quote:
8. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with presenting which one of the following?


Quote:
(A) an enumeration of new approaches

Incorrect. Enumeration means mention a number of things. There's no list or anything like that given.
Quote:
(B) contrasting views of disparate theories

Incorrect. "Contrasting views" --> there are no contrasting views mentioned in the passage. He's only discussing a book by a particular author.
Quote:
(C) a summary of intellectual disputes

Incorrect. There are no "intellectual disputes" in the passage.
Quote:
(D) a discussion of a significant deficiency

Correct! Yes, it is a discussion of a significant deficiency. This follows directly from the main point as well.
Quote:
(E) a correction of an author’s misconceptions

Incorrect. No, the author does not correct Binn's "misconceptions". If anything, he is agreeing with what Binns mentions in the book.
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
A tough one for me.

Took really long to read almost 13 min. I kept rereading portions of it.

got 2 wrong.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Bin [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne