GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 25 Apr 2018, 13:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 89
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2017, 11:58
nickimonckom wrote:
Hi All,

Sorry in advance if my question seems stupid :

While reading, I had the impression that there were no conclusion, only a bunch of statements.
Since the only affirmative sentence was the first, I thought that the conclusion was the following : Replacement of workers ==> Savings
I thought that the second part However it is possible that actually it costs money was only an hypothesis, a possibility.

Then my question is the following : How can you consider a probabability, without any affirmation (introduced by however), a conclusion ?

Thanks in advance for your kind help,


Focus on whats highlighted:
However,many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

Here the author is confirming that companies will eventually have to pay for unemployment. But what if the employees who lost their jobs to automation find jobs in another company? Then the company wont have to pay for unemployment.
But if the employees who lost their jobs to automation are unsuccessful in finding a job? Then these companies will have to pay for them through increased taxes and insurance.

Hope this makes sense.
_________________

If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
employees are being replaced by automation; Author is arguing [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2017, 09:35
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

The author is arguing that

(A) higher taxes and unemployment insurance payments will discourage corporations from automating

(B) replacing people through automation to reduce production costs will result in increases of other costs to corporations.

(C) many workers who lose their jobs to automation will have to be retrained for new jobs

(D) corporations that are laying people off will eventually rehire many of them

(E) corporations will not save money by automating because people will be needed to run the new machines
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 2446
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Premium Member CAT Tests
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2017, 12:06
Hi kalra

Please follow the rules of the forum while posting questions!
This question has already been discussed here.
_________________

Stay hungry, Stay foolish

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Class of 2020: Rotman Thread | Schulich Thread
Class of 2019: Sauder Thread

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 425
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2017, 13:22
DeeptiM wrote:
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.


Summary - Machines replacing employees. Replaced employees will need assist.. to survive. Corp.. will end up paying for them regardless.
Assumption - Replaced employees will NOT be able to find work.

Quote:
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?

(A) Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.

(B) Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.

(C) Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.

(D) Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.

(E) The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.



B,D,E - Irrelevant. Easy OUT
C - Actually weakens the argument. OUT.

A is the answer.
_________________

Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 59
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2017, 21:48
Just to add for completion here..this is one of those questions where even the correct answer requires a LOT of assumptions..which in my opinion isn't the best type of question. However, this is a relatively easy one because the other 4 are so out of whack and nowhere near related to unemployment assistance.

Now, let's get to the fun part..the correct answer A requires the following assumptions:

- Some laid off workers don't have adequate savings to survive.
- Most laid off workers come from companies that have unemployed insurance
- Most unemployed insurance program cover employees terminated due to redundancy - this is DEFINITELY NOT TRUE in the real world, unfortunately.
_________________

Insanity at its finest.

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q48 V17
GPA: 3.83
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2017, 11:26
nickimonckom wrote:
Hi All,

Sorry in advance if my question seems stupid :

While reading, I had the impression that there were no conclusion, only a bunch of statements.
Since the only affirmative sentence was the first, I thought that the conclusion was the following : Replacement of workers ==> Savings
I thought that the second part However it is possible that actually it costs money was only an hypothesis, a possibility.

Then my question is the following : How can you consider a probabability, without any affirmation (introduced by however), a conclusion ?

Thanks in advance for your kind help,


you're right. there are 2 conclusions in this argument.
1st is the corporations concl: to save money
2nd is the autor's concl: however......

the question says to strengthen the authors concl. and so the however... is applicable here.
hope this helps..

==============hit +1 kudos if it helped ====================
Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm   [#permalink] 24 Dec 2017, 11:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipm

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.