Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:59 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:59
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
605-655 Level|   Assumption|         
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [30]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [30]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 02 Oct 2017, 21:57
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:43) correct 37% (01:52) wrong based on 1561 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to 10 milligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe.

The biologist’s response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
hoangyen
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2017
Last visit: 12 Oct 2017
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
24
 [6]
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: International Business, Human Resources
Posts: 5
Kudos: 24
 [6]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 12 Oct 2017, 10:13
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D

The biologist assumes that the only source of the hormone is the injection.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,363
Own Kudos:
778,117
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,966
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,363
Kudos: 778,117
 [5]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 16 Apr 2021, 02:30
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to 10 milligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe.

The biologist’s response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.
Show more

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



(A) No. He does not assume this.

(B) No. This is irrelevant.

(C) No. He does not assume this.

(D) Yes. If female deer already contain 9 milligrams of the hormone, then injecting them with 10 milligrams more would bring the hormone level to 19 milligrams. In this case, by eating less than one entire deer a day, one could surpass the safe level of 10 milligrams of the hormone per day.

(E) No. He does not assume this, and appropriately so. Even if deer meat is rarely eaten, it must be safe in those few times it is consumed.
General Discussion
User avatar
Octobre
User avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2009
Last visit: 06 Jun 2018
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 168
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
Posts: 39
Kudos: 53
 [1]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 03 Oct 2017, 01:46
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D
If she already had some the addition of the 2 would be above the 10
User avatar
arvind910619
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
607
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 03 Oct 2017, 09:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to 10 milligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe.

The biologist’s response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

Source: LSAT
Show more

Imo B

The argument talks about the adverse effect of the hormones as we do not know what harm do these hormones cause to humans .The assumption will somehow relate the hormone used in deer to the to the harm they cause in humans .Then only we can conclude about the the hormone being safe for humans if it has any effects on humans .
B is the correct assumption.
User avatar
Sanjeetgujrall
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2024
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
62
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Germany
GPA: 3
Posts: 50
Kudos: 62
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 03 Oct 2017, 19:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO E because if people consider it as a daily diet then it breaks the conclusion
avatar
mahu101
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2017
Last visit: 31 Mar 2020
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 23
Kudos: 16
 [1]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 03 Oct 2017, 20:40
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo D

biologist is assuming currently that the only source of hormone for a human is through the injection.
avatar
nitishmalagi
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2017
Last visit: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
 [1]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 03 Oct 2017, 21:13
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is the answer IMO.
It would completely destroy the argument if negated.
avatar
kunalsinghNS
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 23 Mar 2022
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
35
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 102
Kudos: 35
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 11 Oct 2017, 22:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arvind910619
broall
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to 10 milligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe.

The biologist’s response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

Source: LSAT

Imo B

The argument talks about the adverse effect of the hormones as we do not know what harm do these hormones cause to humans .The assumption will somehow relate the hormone used in deer to the to the harm they cause in humans .Then only we can conclude about the the hormone being safe for humans if it has any effects on humans .
B is the correct assumption.
Show more

I will try to explain option B

The argument states that human can ingest 10 milligrams of the hormones a day but option B says that hormone is similar to the one in contraceptive but doesn't mention the quantity. hence, i rejected the argument based on this.
avatar
kunalsinghNS
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 23 Mar 2022
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
35
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 102
Kudos: 35
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 11 Oct 2017, 22:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sanjeetgujrall
IMO E because if people consider it as a daily diet then it breaks the conclusion
Show more

I would like to explain option E -

If i say "Most of the people consider meat as a part of their daily diet and eat it occasionally" but we don't know about the quantity as one whole deer or a fraction of it.
hence, i rejected the Option E
avatar
kristieboa
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2019
Last visit: 08 Jun 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 4
 [4]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 19 May 2019, 10:50
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My explanation is

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
→ The time to treat dear does not affect the conclusion. Incorrect
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
→ “similar to hormones used in human” is not relevant.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
→ “Hunting season for deer could be scheduled” is not relevant
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
Negate this: “The hormone in question occurs naturally in the female deer that would be injected.” Existing amount of hormone + 10 milli gr injected = exceeding amount → Attack the conclusion. CORRECT
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.
→ Easily to mistake. But this sentence says “deer meat” is not “daily diet” while the argument says “no one would eat one entire deer a day”. It’s different between “frequency of daily eating” and “eating quantity/day”. So it is not in our scope. Incorrect.
User avatar
J2S2019
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
268
Given Kudos: 371
Location: India
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 269
Kudos: 268
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 19 May 2019, 11:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D.
It is the only option that tells that surplus of 10 mg hrm will be there if naturally this hrm is being generated in deer body.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 14 Oct 2025
Posts: 3,380
Own Kudos:
2,141
 [2]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,380
Kudos: 2,141
 [2]
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 01 Feb 2020, 06:25
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arvind910619
broall
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to 10 milligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe.

The biologist’s response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone.
(B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.
(C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season.
(D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected.
(E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

Source: LSAT

Imo B

The argument talks about the adverse effect of the hormones as we do not know what harm do these hormones cause to humans .The assumption will somehow relate the hormone used in deer to the to the harm they cause in humans .Then only we can conclude about the the hormone being safe for humans if it has any effects on humans .
B is the correct assumption.
Show more

Hi


Given:
1. Per the proposal: 10 mg of hormones suppresses fertility in female deer
2. Per the critics: This poses health risk to people eating such meat because unsafe quantities of the hormone (10 mg) will go into the bodies of the people.
3. Per the biologists: 10 mg/per day safe for humans and no one can eat one whole deer in a day.

Conclusion: Ingesting 10mg into the female deer whose meat is eaten by people is safe for those people.

Pre-thinking:
1. The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of the information that 10 mg/per day is safe for humans and no one can eat one whole deer in one day.
2. What if the treated deer has some quantity of the hormone existing in its body naturally even before the treatment? That would up the total quantity of the hormone in the deer meat.
3. Assumption: The deer being treated does not already produce the hormone naturally.

Choice B analysis

The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives.

The scope of the argument is whether treating the deer with 10mg hormone is safe for people eating such meat. This choice implies a similar hormone may find its way into the body of people eating the treated meat, from some other source, the contraceptives. This choice implies that a person might actually end up ingesting more than 10 mg of the chemicals in the deer hormone since the contraceptives also have similar chemicals. Hence, this choice, if anything weakens the conclusion.

Incorrect CHoice

Hope this helps. :)
User avatar
VarshithaRS
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2023
Last visit: 04 Nov 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 63
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 8
Kudos: 6
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 18 Jun 2024, 13:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@Bunnel, could you please help me understand how we are inferring that this hormone is already present in deer at 9 milligrams? It is not mentioned anywhere in the question. Additionally, considering the statement in the conclusion, "since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe," I am leaning towards choosing 'E' as my option instead of 'D'. Could you please help me understand how I can eliminate option 'E'?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed inje 27 Aug 2025, 23:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts