mundasingh123
Friends we overlooke dthe purpose behind why this questions has been posted in the First Place.
The Guy who posted this question is confused because he finds all the options correct except A and i agree with Him.
I feel all the options except A make it appear that the
Revenue will decrease if any of the options B to E are implemented.
Guys please correct me if we are wrong .
I suppose Teh Jay agrees on this view
The question is fairly straightforward. A 50% increase in the per-mile toll is brought about. In order to increase the annual
revenue, the mandated condition is: Number of miles remain same, or increases.
In order to finance road repairs, the highway commission of a certain state is considering a 50 percent increase in the 10-centers-per-mile toll for vehicles using its toll highway. The highway commissioner claims that the toll increase will increase the annual
revenue generated by the toll highway by at least 50 percent per year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the highway commissioner's claim depends?
(A) The amount of money required annually for road repairs will not increase from its current level. - Irrelevant. Why do we care about the road repairs? We are talking about
revenue generated by tolls, not the "profit" or "breakeven" of the highway authorities.
(B) The total number of trips made on the toll highway per year will not decrease from its current level. - Information about number of trips without average mileage per trip is redundant.
(C) The average length of a trip made on the toll highway will not decrease from its current level. As stated above, information about mileage without the number of trips will not serve any purpose for what we are asked to find here.
(D) The number of drivers who consistently avoid the highway tolls by using secondary roads will not increase from its current level. This is a very indirect option, and we can probably hold on to see if there's a better answer.
(E) The total distance traveled by vehicles on the toll highway per year will not decrease from its current level. This is the correct answer. If you are looking a toll that is charged per mile, and you know the total distance traveled by the cars stays the same, in essence you're saying that there's a 50% increase in the revenues. Think about numerical figures:
Let's say total distance traveled before was 100 miles. This stays the same now. Let's assume the toll per mile was $1 initially and now it's $1.5. Original
revenue was $100 and now
revenue is $150, which is 50% more than the original
revenue. This statement directly supplements the question and hence is the right choice.
TehJay's Question was:
Quote:
Honestly, I guess I understand why (E) is the OA - because it's the only one that specifically mentions the total distance traveled - but B and D will also directly lead to a decrease in the total number of miles traveled. It seems really ambiguous to me.
B and D give you one part of the information and fail to give you the rest. Knowledge about the number of trips without average distance traveled per trip or vice versa is not useful in evaluating this argument. Okay, as per B the number of trips has increased from say, 50 to 100. But the average length of the trip has gone down from 3 miles to 1 mile, this means, in effect, the toll collected has reduced. Similarly for the other situation. Let's say the average miles per trip has gone up, but it's in a way that the number of trips have gone down. So each piece by itself is insufficient to frame a conclusion. You can't afford to assume whatever you need to justify an answer or in this case, answers that seems right. Thinking objectively about all possible constraints will help resolve most issues on tricky questions like these. And in the end, sometimes, you just have to go with the best option, since it might feel like multiple options are correct sometimes.