1. The author of the passage would probably consider which of the following judgments to be most similar to the reasoning of the critics mentioned in line 11 (Highlighted)? ExplanationThe passage says:- Some critics think Hansberry’s play has “unintentional” irony or contradictions.
- They think this because they refuse to see her as capable of intentional irony.
- Their reasoning: They see thematic conflicts means assume it’s confusion/contradiction rather than deliberate commentary.
So the flawed reasoning is:Because I don’t believe the creator could intend X, any appearance of X must be unintentional (due to incompetence, confusion, etc.).
A. is not about misattributing intent due to preconception of creator’s ability.
B. is also not about intent, more about possibility/capability.
C. Yes! This matches: preconception about creator’s ability/intent leads to misattributing an effect to incompetence rather than purposeful art.
D. This is about moral judgment, not about intent of an artist.
E. is about definition of a genre, not about denying capacity for intentional artistic choice.
Answer: C