Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 04:20 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 04:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bismuth83
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Sep 2024
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 714
Own Kudos:
3,131
 [8]
Given Kudos: 441
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 714
Kudos: 3,131
 [8]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,796
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,362
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,796
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,362
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,796
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,362
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Solution:
Bunuel
Based on the information provided, which of the following would most likely reduce the financial burden associated with the Sustainable Logging Initiative?

Reducing the area reserved for reforestation, allowing more land for harvesting.
Seeking additional government grants to further offset the increased operating costs.
Investing in eco-friendly machinery that requires less maintenance.
Increasing the price of products to pass some costs to consumers.
Partnering with other companies to share the costs of eco-friendly equipment.

We are asked to find the statement that would most likely reduce the financial burden associated with the Sustainable Logging Initiative and be based on the text. All of the possible options seem reasonable, however, only government grants are mentioned in the text to be used as way to cut costs. So, our answer is: Seeking additional government grants to further offset the increased operating costs.


Correct answer:

Based on the information provided, which of the following would most likely reduce the financial burden associated with the Sustainable Logging Initiative? "Seeking additional government grants to further offset the increased operating costs."
User avatar
mkeshri185
Joined: 01 May 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 110
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In Q2 why not C is the answer?

sustainable practices could reduce regulatory fines and penalties,

this statement is directly given in the passage in tab 2. E is bit more certain and extreme. but C is also directly mentioned and it also includes the word 'could'
Bismuth83
Attachment:
Screenshot (207).png
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,796
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,362
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mkeshri185
In Q2 why not C is the answer?

sustainable practices could reduce regulatory fines and penalties,

this statement is directly given in the passage in tab 2. E is bit more certain and extreme. but C is also directly mentioned and it also includes the word 'could'


B says: Sustainable practices could lead to reduced regulatory fines and penalties over time.


  • It’s secondary and speculative. Email 2 says “there may be long-term savings as sustainable practices could reduce regulatory fines and penalties.” That is a maybe and long-term, not the core rationale.
  • It isn’t tied to the stated argument for adoption. The CEO’s argument in Email 1 is to “align us with the Green Lumber Certification program,” to “improve our public image,” and to access subsidies and grants.
  • It isn’t quantified. The chart and Email 2 quantify grants at about 70,000. No numbers are given for reduced fines.

Why E is best:

It directly mirrors the CEO’s stated reason for adopting and has concrete support in the materials (certification, reputation, grants). So B supports the move, but E best supports the argument.
User avatar
tomloveless
Joined: 23 Jan 2023
Last visit: 14 Apr 2026
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: United States (CT)
Products:
Posts: 30
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q3 seems like A could be pretty legit. "These expenses cover the rental and maintenance of eco-friendly equipment and the reduced availability of land for harvesting, as some is reserved for reforestation." Increasing harvesting area would reduce cost based on the paragraph. Oh well.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,718
Own Kudos:
810,362
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,796
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,718
Kudos: 810,362
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tomloveless
Q3 seems like A could be pretty legit. "These expenses cover the rental and maintenance of eco-friendly equipment and the reduced availability of land for harvesting, as some is reserved for reforestation." Increasing harvesting area would reduce cost based on the paragraph. Oh well.

A conflicts with the very condition that unlocks the savings.

The emails say the reforestation set-aside enables Green Lumber certification and qualifies the company for grants. If you cut that area, you risk losing certification and the 70,000 in grants. That would save at most 35,000 on land but could forfeit 70,000, making the net burden worse. Grants already shrink the 75,000 cost increase to about 5,000, so seeking more grants is the option most likely to reduce the burden within the stated plan.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109718 posts
498 posts
210 posts