GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 05 Aug 2020, 11:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 99
Location: India
In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 May 2020, 00:50
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:29) correct 22% (01:38) wrong based on 432 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?


(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.

(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.

(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.

(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.

(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing.

_________________
Cheers,
SD

Originally posted by SudiptoGmat on 19 Feb 2010, 04:07.
Last edited by Bunuel on 04 May 2020, 00:50, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 16
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2010, 08:16
IMO B

(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used. Primary function could be expressing ideas clearly...
(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.
(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer. The argument never says that..
(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers. Out of scope(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing. Out of scope
SVP
SVP
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2272
Location: New York, NY
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2012, 22:13
In order to support an argument, the supporting leg must reference the same topics.

In the argument, the relationship between two topics X and Y are ("intention" and "arrangement of words") - and we know the argument links them.

The supporting statement must link them as well.

A) It's true that (A) is strong because of the word "primary" - but what if it were removed?

The topic becomes the "function of style in writing" - then we see that the function connects to "augmenting the literal meanings of words"

Does it connect "intention" and "arrangement of words" as the argument does? It's a stretch..in a way intention is similar to the "augmentation of literal meaning of words" but that connection is not 100% clear.

As a result, (A) is not the choice that "most strongly" supports - (B) more strongly supports since the topics and relationships are more directly similar.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 643
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 10:08
1
In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.
The author may use agreement of words to cahnge the meaning of the script.
(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.
Correct answer as per argument.
(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.
no such comparison made ,out of scope.
(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.
if the writer writes an ambigous script only then,other wise it can be very clear for all the readers
(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing.
the writer may intend to express a different meaning than what is understood from the script.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 208
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2018, 08:27
In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences.
Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.
(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences. -> correct
(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.
(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.
(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Posts: 148
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
WE: Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2019, 10:02
In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences.
Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used. Nowhere in the passage such an information is given. To say the least it is a far fetched assumption.
(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences. Closest to what the passage says. Best choice.
(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer. We cannot deduce this from the information given in the passage. The passage doesn't compare the reader and listener.
(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers. The passage rather says the opposite, if the writer has to convey something, he/she does so by means of style of writing.
(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing. The information in the passage never indicates anything of this sort.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Posts: 179
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2019, 16:33
Fact: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning.
Fact: Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style;
Fact: ...the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences.

Notes
speech: gest. + tone --> meaning
v. writing: use style
for reader, order word + sentence ---> meaning


This stimulus is a pretty straightforward set of facts...common in Must Be True question types. The idea is that gestures and tone lead to meaning in speech but in writing, style (explained as order of words/sentences) dictate meaning for the reader. We are looking for an answer that follows from the set of facts presented.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.
No information in the stimulus mentions that style "augment[s] the literal meaning". The stimulus only mentions "relying on style" to convey meaning.

(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.
This works. Since the fact set presented the idea that style = arrangement of words & sentences and style helps reader "detect intentions". Let's hold this.

(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.
The stimulus never tells us whether speech or writing is "easier" in terms of detecting tone/style. Doesn't discuss listeners at all.

(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.
While this may be true (outside of the GMAT), the fact set does not support the concept of "different interpretations by different readers." The set only discusses the difference between speech and writing when it comes to detecting tone. Also, "always" is far too extreme.

(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing.
This is a very extreme answer choice. We know that "arrangement of words" helps reader "detect tone" but it does not "completely determine" anything - let alone "aesthetic value" (which is not mentioned at all)!

_________________
.
"What you do in practice determines your level of success. I used to tell my players: You have to give 100% everyday. Whatever you don't give, you can't make it up tomorrow."
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2020, 05:54
(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.

We don't know if this is the primary function of style, not mentioned in the argument.

(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.

YES, this can be proven from the information of the stimulus. (In part because we don't know what the author's real/intended meaning can truly be)

(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.
It depends on the listener (could be true)

(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.
Yes, but is a general truth, not mentioned in the stimulus.

(E) The writer’s arrangement of words and sentences completely determines the aesthetic value of his or her writing.
Out of scope
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of   [#permalink] 10 Jul 2020, 05:54

In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne