It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 01:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 572 [2], given: 29

In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 12:50
2
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (00:43) correct 19% (00:52) wrong based on 510 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Attachment:

Figure.PNG [ 5.28 KiB | Viewed 23033 times ]
In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS||QR, is the length of segment PQ less than the length of segment SR ?

(1) x>y

(2) x+y>90
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 572 [2], given: 29

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41872

Kudos [?]: 128493 [5], given: 12179

In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 13:15
5
KUDOS
Expert's post
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED

In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS||QR, is the length of segment PQ less than the length of segment SR ?

(1) x>y --> if the angles x and y were equal then the length of segment PQ would be equal to the length of segment SR (as PS||QR). Now, as x>y it means that point R is to the left of the position it would be if x and y were equal (previous case), or in other words, we should drag point R to the left to the position of R2 to make angle y less than x, thus making the length of segment SR bigger than the length of segment PQ. So as x>y than SR>PQ. Sufficient.

(2) x+y>90 --> clearly insufficient: if $$x=y=60$$ then the length of segment PQ would be equal to the length of segment SR but if $$x=60$$ and $$y=45$$ then the length of segment PQ would be less than the length of segment SR. Not sufficient.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Attachment:

untitled.PNG [ 38.85 KiB | Viewed 24308 times ]

_________________

Kudos [?]: 128493 [5], given: 12179

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 88 [1], given: 3

Re: Length of segment PQ less than segment SR [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 10:56
1
KUDOS
Exactly the explanation given by Bunuel... +1 for A

Kudos [?]: 88 [1], given: 3

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7668

Kudos [?]: 17321 [11], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: Need help with these 5 GMAT Prep questions... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2010, 18:02
11
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
MisterEko wrote:
Guys,
as my G-day is approaching, I am putting more and more effort in improving my Quant. However, I seem to have troubles with some basic concepts. Below are the 5 questions which I know have simple explanations but are for some reason difficult for me to understand. If you can explain the solutions for any of them, I would greatly appreciate it! Cheers!

Note that the shortest distance between two parallel lines is the perpendicular distance. As the angle keeps decreasing, the length of the line keeps increasing. So if we know that x>y, then PQ < SR. Stmnt 1 Sufficient.

Attachment:

Ques1.jpg [ 2.61 KiB | Viewed 23692 times ]

Since statement 2 doesn't give any information about relative size of x and y, nothing can be said about PQ and SR. Not sufficient.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Kudos [?]: 17321 [11], given: 232 Magoosh GMAT Instructor Joined: 28 Dec 2011 Posts: 4417 Kudos [?]: 8418 [18], given: 102 Re: Geometry Problem [#permalink] ### Show Tags 02 Jan 2012, 16:01 18 This post received KUDOS Expert's post 3 This post was BOOKMARKED Hi there. I'm happy to help with this. So, the lines PS & RQ are parallel, angles X & Y are each less than 90 degrees. Statement #1 tells us angle X is greater than angle Y. In the diagram, I showed an exaggerated example of this ---- if Y is a much smaller angle, it follows a less steep diagonal, which travels a longer distance between the two lines, as shown in the diagram. Therefore, if (angle X) > (angle Y), then segment RS is longer than segment PQ. Statement #1 is sufficient. (Notice that this logic depends on both angles staying less than 90 degrees. If X had a value greater than 90 degrees, it would start making a longer, less steep, line segment on the left side.) Statement #2 says only that the sum (x + y) is greater than 90. The trouble with that is: it doesn't give us any way to distinguish x vs. y --- either one could be much bigger than the other, or they both could be equal. No way to distinguish x vs. y ==> no way to distinguish RS vs. PQ. Insufficient. Correct answer = A Does that make sense? Let me know if you have any questions on that. Mike Attachments parallel lines, unequal angles.PNG [ 7.81 KiB | Viewed 23261 times ] _________________ Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep Kudos [?]: 8418 [18], given: 102 Manager Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 104 Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 6 Location: United States Re: Geometry Problem [#permalink] ### Show Tags 07 Jan 2012, 15:57 My two cents in as well... Re-phrase: Since PS || QR, PQ inversely proportional to angle x, and SR is inversely proportional to angle y. That is we need relationship between Q and R to determine relationship between PQ and SR. 1. x>y -> PQ < SR. Suff 2. x+y=90. x>y or x<y. Insuff. A _________________ I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul. Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved! DS - If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution. PS - Always look at the answers first CR - Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion SC - Meaning first, Grammar second RC - Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 3-4 min Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 6 Intern Joined: 15 Feb 2012 Posts: 8 Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 14 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Operations Schools: ISB '14 GPA: 3.09 WE: Operations (Manufacturing) Re: Geometry [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Mar 2012, 06:52 subhajeet wrote: Can someone help me on this question. Statement 1 let the distance between the parallel lines be h then sinx=h/PQ & siny=h/RS, we see that PQ*sinx=constant (x in deg) as sinx increases in the domain [0,90] i.e sin60>sin30 we can say that inorder to keep the product constant, if sinx increases then PQ decreases.. for ex if x=30 and y=60 as sin30(=0.5)<sin60(=0.866) so PQ>RS Thus statement 1 alone is sufficient Statement 2 If x+y>90 case 1:if both x and y are equal then PQ=RS case 2: if x>y then PQ<RS case 3: if x<y then PQ>RS So insufficient. Thus the ans is A Alternatively, if We have two towers of the same height, the farther we are from the tower the lesser we need to raise our head to see the top of the tower. That is ,more is the distance between the top of the tower and our eye lesser is the head raised. I hope it makes sense. Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 14 Intern Joined: 27 Dec 2014 Posts: 4 Kudos [?]: [0], given: 17 Re: In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Feb 2015, 02:58 Hi guys, I went through the task and argued similar we would have argued in a triangle. The side which is opposite the smaller angle is also the smaller side. (in a triangle) But here in a polygon this argumentation doesnt hold. Because I thought SR is smaller than PQ because angle x is smaller than (180-y). After reading your explanations I totally get your point, but I dont understand why we can't argue the same way we do with triangles. Thanks ! Kudos [?]: [0], given: 17 Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7668 Kudos [?]: 17321 [1], given: 232 Location: Pune, India Re: In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Feb 2015, 04:38 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post gmatstrong wrote: Hi guys, I went through the task and argued similar we would have argued in a triangle. The side which is opposite the smaller angle is also the smaller side. (in a triangle) But here in a polygon this argumentation doesnt hold. Because I thought SR is smaller than PQ because angle x is smaller than (180-y). After reading your explanations I totally get your point, but I dont understand why we can't argue the same way we do with triangles. Thanks ! First of all, think, which side of the quadrilateral is the opposite side to any given angle. Look at the diagram, the angle has 2 sides opposite to it (which don't form the angle). You can make one of the opposite sides smaller and the other greater at whim. So there is no defined relation between the angle and the opposite sides. Attachment: Ques3.jpg [ 4.6 KiB | Viewed 16189 times ] _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17321 [1], given: 232

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 190

Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Re: In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2017, 06:35
VeritasPrepKarishma Bunuel

Quote:
Note that the shortest distance between two parallel lines is the perpendicular distance. As the angle keeps decreasing, the length of the line keeps increasing.

Above statement I understood

Quote:
So if we know that x>y, then PQ < SR. Stmnt 1 Sufficient.

Above statement i am not able to visualize correctly to identify opposite sides to angles x and y.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 190

Re: In the figure above, if x and y are each less than 90 and PS   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2017, 06:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by