Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 15:00 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 15:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
810,465
 [8]
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,465
 [8]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sasindran
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Last visit: 08 Jul 2023
Posts: 250
Own Kudos:
334
 [1]
Given Kudos: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.73
WE:Design (Real Estate)
Posts: 250
Kudos: 334
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sohrabbanker
Joined: 09 Sep 2017
Last visit: 08 Jan 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
1,805
 [2]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
septwibowo
Bunuel

In the figure above, the circles with centers A and B are tangent to each other at C, and are tangents to the lines m and n at F and D. If the radius of each of the circles is √2 and m is parallel to n, what is the length of EF?

(A) 2√2 + 1
(B) 2√2 + 2
(C) 2√2 + 3
(D) 3√2
(E) 3√2 + 1


Attachment:
The attachment 2017-11-30_1000.png is no longer available

Bunuel, do we have OE for this answer?

Thanks!

Hi septwibowo

Refer below image. I have joined points G & C where line GC will be common tangent to both the circles
Attachment:
geo.jpg
geo.jpg [ 19.95 KiB | Viewed 5016 times ]

BC & AC will be perpendicular to line GC (radius is perpendicular to the tangent)

So Triangles ACG & BCG will be similar (AC=BC=radius; GC is common side, angle GCB=angle GCA=90)

=> \(\frac{AC}{BC}=\frac{AG}{BG} =>AG=BG\)

this means that triangle ABG will be isosceles right angle triangle, so sides will be in the ration \(1:1:\sqrt{2}\)

\(AB= \sqrt{2}+\sqrt{2}=2\sqrt{2}\)

Therefore \(BG=2\)

Hence \(EF= EG+BG+BF\)

\(EG=AD=\sqrt{2}\)

So \(EF=\sqrt{2}+2+\sqrt{2}=2\sqrt{2}+2\)

Option B
User avatar
Krystallized
Joined: 05 Nov 2016
Last visit: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
Concentration: Operations
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niks18
septwibowo
Bunuel

In the figure above, the circles with centers A and B are tangent to each other at C, and are tangents to the lines m and n at F and D. If the radius of each of the circles is √2 and m is parallel to n, what is the length of EF?

(A) 2√2 + 1
(B) 2√2 + 2
(C) 2√2 + 3
(D) 3√2
(E) 3√2 + 1


Attachment:
2017-11-30_1000.png

Bunuel, do we have OE for this answer?

Thanks!

Hi septwibowo

Refer below image. I have joined points G & C where line GC will be common tangent to both the circles
Attachment:
geo.jpg

BC & AC will be perpendicular to line GC (radius is perpendicular to the tangent)

So Triangles ACG & BCG will be similar (AC=BC=radius; GC is common side, angle GCB=angle GCA=90)

=> \(\frac{AC}{BC}=\frac{AG}{BG} =>AG=BG\)

this means that triangle ABG will be isosceles right angle triangle, so sides will be in the ration \(1:1:\sqrt{2}\)

\(AB= \sqrt{2}+\sqrt{2}=2\sqrt{2}\)

Therefore \(BG=2\)

Hence \(EF= EG+BG+BF\)

\(EG=AD=\sqrt{2}\)

So \(EF=\sqrt{2}+2+\sqrt{2}=2\sqrt{2}+2\)

Option B


Hi niks18,

How did you conclude that a line tangent to both the circles from point C will meet at point G??
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krystallized

Hi niks18,

How did you conclude that a line tangent to both the circles from point C will meet at point G??

Hi Krystallized

Few thing to note here -
1. Point C is the point of tang-ency of both the circles
2. Radius is perpendicular to the tangent, so AC & BC will be perpendicular to the line passing through point C
3. Point C is also the mid-point of hypotenuse of right triangle AGB, where G is vertex
4. Perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle.

You can always join the mid-point of the hypotenuse with the vertex. I do not see any issue here.

Is there any specific query you have in mind?
User avatar
Krystallized
Joined: 05 Nov 2016
Last visit: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
Concentration: Operations
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niks18
Krystallized

Hi niks18,

How did you conclude that a line tangent to both the circles from point C will meet at point G??

Hi Krystallized

Few thing to note here -
1. Point C is the point of tang-ency of both the circles
2. Radius is perpendicular to the tangent, so AC & BC will be perpendicular to the line passing through point C
3. Point C is also the mid-point of hypotenuse of right triangle AGB, where G is vertex
4. Perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle.

You can always join the mid-point of the hypotenuse with the vertex. I do not see any issue here.

Is there any specific query you have in mind?

Hi niks18

Thank you for your reply and explaination

I totally agree with the points mentioned by you in the above post.
My specific query is, how did you decide that a line perpendicular to AB from point C will intersect line BE at G?
I think this is possible only if angle ABG and angle BAG are each 45 degree or AG and BG are of same length. Otherwise the line would intersect BE somewhere below point G.
I know we can always join the midpoint of hypotenuse with the vertex, but that does not guarantee that the line joining those two points will always be perpendicular to the hypotenuse.
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krystallized
niks18
Krystallized

Hi niks18,

How did you conclude that a line tangent to both the circles from point C will meet at point G??

Hi Krystallized

Few thing to note here -
1. Point C is the point of tang-ency of both the circles
2. Radius is perpendicular to the tangent, so AC & BC will be perpendicular to the line passing through point C
3. Point C is also the mid-point of hypotenuse of right triangle AGB, where G is vertex
4. Perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle.

You can always join the mid-point of the hypotenuse with the vertex. I do not see any issue here.

Is there any specific query you have in mind?

Hi niks18

Thank you for your reply and explaination

I totally agree with the points mentioned by you in the above post.
My specific query is, how did you decide that a line perpendicular to AB from point C will intersect line BE at G?
I think this is possible only if angle ABG and angle BAG are each 45 degree or AG and BG are of same length. Otherwise the line would intersect BE somewhere below point G.
I know we can always join the midpoint of hypotenuse with the vertex, but that does not guarantee that the line joining those two points will always be perpendicular to the hypotenuse.

Hi Krystallized

I hope you would agree that triangle ABG is a right angled triangle with angle AGB being 90. AB will be the hypotenuse of this triangle with point C as its mid point. Point C is the point of tang-ency of both the circles so any tangent passing through point C will be perpendicular to AB (AC & BC are radius and radius is perpendicular to the tangent)

Next if from point G I draw a perpendicular bisector or simply a bisector of the hypotenuse AB, then Can you tell from which point the line will pass?

angle ABG and angle BAG will eventually each be 45 because Perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle and in my solution above it is evident that AG=BG i.e the it is an isosceles right angle triangle.

Also note, you cannot squeeze or expand the circles because radius is fixed. You cannot increase the distance between the parallel lines as it is also fixed. So if you are confused that such a situation can also arise at some other position by moving the circles, then that is not possible because in that case either the parallel lines will not be tangent or their distance will have to be increased/decreased. The figure is drawn in such a way that triangle ABG will be right isosceles, there is no other possibility otherwise you will have to alter the distance or the radius. you cannot move the upper circle lower otherwise it will not touch the upper tangent line and you cannot move the circle further high becuase in that case for upper line to be tangent you will have to squeeze i.e reduce the radius of upper circle.
User avatar
DharLog
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Posts: 312
Kudos: 345
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niks18


Also note, you cannot squeeze or expand the circles because radius is fixed. You cannot increase the distance between the parallel lines as it is also fixed. So if you are confused that such a situation can also arise at some other position by moving the circles, then that is not possible because in that case either the parallel lines will not be tangent or their distance will have to be increased/decreased. The figure is drawn in such a way that triangle ABG will be right isosceles, there is no other possibility otherwise you will have to alter the distance or the radius. you cannot move the upper circle lower otherwise it will not touch the upper tangent line and you cannot move the circle further high becuase in that case for upper line to be tangent you will have to squeeze i.e reduce the radius of upper circle.

Excuse me, Niks18! Maybe I do not understand something, but I agree with Crystalized.
You say, we can not touch the circles. But I can put one of them exactly below another. And I will get an answer 4sqrt(2) (not in the options). Which initial conditions will I break?

In the figure above, the circles with centers A and B are tangent to each other at C - done
and are tangents to the lines m and n at F and D - done
If the radius of each of the circles is √2 and m is parallel to n, what is the length of EF? (EF wil be the same line DF)
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DharLog
niks18


Also note, you cannot squeeze or expand the circles because radius is fixed. You cannot increase the distance between the parallel lines as it is also fixed. So if you are confused that such a situation can also arise at some other position by moving the circles, then that is not possible because in that case either the parallel lines will not be tangent or their distance will have to be increased/decreased. The figure is drawn in such a way that triangle ABG will be right isosceles, there is no other possibility otherwise you will have to alter the distance or the radius. you cannot move the upper circle lower otherwise it will not touch the upper tangent line and you cannot move the circle further high becuase in that case for upper line to be tangent you will have to squeeze i.e reduce the radius of upper circle.

Excuse me, Niks18! Maybe I do not understand something, but I agree with Crystalized.
You say, we can not touch the circles. But I can put one of them exactly below another. And I will get an answer 4sqrt(2) (not in the options). Which initial conditions will I break?

In the figure above, the circles with centers A and B are tangent to each other at C - done
and are tangents to the lines m and n at F and D - done
If the radius of each of the circles is √2 and m is parallel to n, what is the length of EF? (EF wil be the same line DF)

Hi DharLog

Pls refer the image below -
Attachment:
geo.jpg
geo.jpg [ 26 KiB | Viewed 3955 times ]

Triangle EFD is a right angled triangle with DF as its hypotenuse. The Hypotenuse is the LARGEST side of the triangle and it cannot be equal to its height EF, hence you do not see the option \(4\sqrt{2}\)
if you move the two circles either to the right or to the left then you will have to move the parallel line m & n as well to satisfy all the conditions given in the question.
In the existing structure no movement of the circles is possible, hence you cannot put one circle exactly below the other
User avatar
sumit411
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 210
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sohrabbanker
Hi, I tried an overly simplistic approach, and got the answer E.
It took me 10 seconds after trying all the theories I knew. Basically EF consists of 3 radi's plus something in the middle , so it must be 3√2 + 1. ( assuming the line opposite the radius is parallel to the radius.

Many assumptions taken, still not a concrete answer.
Bunuel

What is wrong with this approach?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sumit411
sohrabbanker
Hi, I tried an overly simplistic approach, and got the answer E.
It took me 10 seconds after trying all the theories I knew. Basically EF consists of 3 radi's plus something in the middle , so it must be 3√2 + 1. ( assuming the line opposite the radius is parallel to the radius.

Many assumptions taken, still not a concrete answer.
Bunuel

What is wrong with this approach?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hi sumit411,

how can you be certain that the "something in middle" is 1 and not 0.5 or 0.4 or any other value?

if "something in middle" is 0.414, then the answer will be B

Option B = 4.828427125 and

Option E = 5.242640687, between Option B & E there is a difference of only 0.414213562 and this difference cannot be predicted by naked eye
avatar
Anshkarha
Joined: 22 Jul 2018
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 5
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mate I don't understand how this has a unique answer. we're asked to find the distance between m & n so which is an unknown that relies on the position of the circles. There isn't any constraint given that locks the circles at a particular spot.

The constraints as per the question
i) Circles are tangent at C
ii) lines m & f are parallel at points F and D
iii) radius is rt2
iv) m is parallel to n

If I move the circles left and right, essentially moving point C, which of these constraints is violated? moving the parallel lines up and down doesn't change any of the above 4 points.
Experts pls advise!
User avatar
elPatron434
User avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 22 Jul 2018
Last visit: 12 Jun 2024
Posts: 473
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 618
GRE 1: Q165 V163
GRE 2: Q165 V163
GRE 3: Q170 V163
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GRE 1: Q165 V163
GRE 2: Q165 V163
GRE 3: Q170 V163
Posts: 473
Kudos: 373
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u Bunuel could you please help us understand this better?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,230
Kudos: 44,984
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
elPatron434
chetan2u Bunuel could you please help us understand this better?

Hi
I believe it is missing the information that ∆BAO is isosceles triangle that is angle BAO is 45°
If it is given than BA is 2√2 and BO=AO=2
EF=EB+BO+OE=√2+2+√2=2√2+2


Bunuel, would you please check the question. Even the choices are not in order..
Attachments

PicsArt_08-22-02.24.07.png
PicsArt_08-22-02.24.07.png [ 12.8 KiB | Viewed 3688 times ]

User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,956
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,956
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderator:
Math Expert
109728 posts