In the last half-century, firefighters in North America have developed

Question

In the last half-century, firefighters in
North America have developed a powerful system for
fighting wildfires using modern technology. But at the
same time, foresters and ecologists are increasingly
  (5)   aware that too much firefighting can be worse than
none at all. Over the millennia, many forest ecosystems
have evolved in such a way that they are dependent on
periodic fires for renewal and for limiting damage
when fires do occur. Ancient ponderosa forests, for
  (10)   example, were stable in part because low-intensity
fires maintained open forests with low levels of fuel
for future fires. These fires burned lightly around the
bases of mature trees, leaving these trees alive and
clearing the understory of brush and young trees.
  (15)   Scientists can easily count the regular recurrence of
fires in these forests over the centuries by examining
the scars left on trunks the typical interval between
fires could be as short as 5 years and rarely extended
beyond 25 years.

(20)   If fires are kept out of forests, however, deadwood
and other fuels build up then, when fire is sparked by
lightning or some other cause, what results is a fire so
large that it leaves total devastation. Such fires often
kill off wildlife that might escape low-intensity fires,
  (25)   and they also reach the crowns of centuries-old trees,
destroying them and ultimately enabling rains to erode
the unprotected topsoil. Because of the relative success
of fire-suppression efforts, many forests, including
ponderosa forests, have now been free of fire for
  (30)   50 years or longer, leaving them vulnerable to these
devastating crown fires. It is therefore increasingly
necessary for land managers in North America to
strive to manage rather than eliminate fires land
management policies should recognize the essential
  (35)   role that fire plays in many ecosystems.

Fire behavior depends on the complex interaction
of three factors—topography, weather, and fuel—and
since topography is fixed and weather is unpredictable,
fuel is the only element that land managers can
  (40)   control. Land managers should therefore focus their
efforts on fuel. A new kind of wildfire management
that is designed to simulate the natural role of fire
through a combination of selective harvesting and
prescribed fires is the most promising method for
  (45)   controlling fuel. Selective timber harvesting focuses
on smaller trees—markets for this smaller material
do exist—leaving the larger, fire-tolerant trees on the
land and thinning the forest, thereby re-creating the
conditions that allow for low-intensity burns.
  (50)   Prescribed fire management includes both the
intentional lighting of controlled burns and the policy
of allowing fires set by lightning to burn when the
weather is damp enough to reduce the risk of extensive
damage. Once fuels are reduced by these fires,
  (55)   maintenance burns at 15- to 20-year intervals will be
needed. When wildfires inevitably occur, they will be
more easily controlled and do much less damage.    1 
 1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) claim that ideological dogma may be impeding the enactment of a fundamental and necessary policy change
(B) compare the actual effects that have resulted from two different policies designed to have the same effect
(C) contend that a recently implemented policy requires a substantial increase in funding
(D) recommend a fundamental policy change in light of evidence that current policy has created undesirable conditions
(E) argue that two seemingly contradictory goals of a policy are actually compatible in a fundamental way

2 
 2. By “maintenance burns” (line 55) the author most clearly refers to

(A) the low-intensity fires that regularly occurred in ancient forests
(B) fires that reduce the population density of mature trees
(C) the types of fires that are likely to occur in North American forest ecosystems today
(D) a type of fire that used to occur at intervals greater than 50 years
(E) naturally or intentionally set fires that are allowed to burn to eliminate fuel

3 
 3. Which one of the following sentences would most logically complete the last paragraph of the passage?

(A) However, if homes were not built in such close proximity to forests, the damage to developed property would be limited substantially.
(B) Unfortunately, until foresters recognize the dangers posed by excess fuel in forests, these proposals are likely to meet with resistance in the forestry community.
(C) But even with these policies, which require some years to achieve their intended effects, large, devastating fires will remain a threat in the near term.
(D) Yet, because smaller trees will likely yield less profit for timber companies, the ecological benefits of the new plans must be weighed carefully against their economic impact.
(E) But given the large financial resources needed to operate a prescribed fire management system, the chances of such policies being implemented are quite small.

4 
 4. The author cites the factors of topography, weather, and fuel in the last paragraph primarily as part of

(A) the support provided for the contention that land managers must focus on fuel to reduce the risk of crown fires
(B) an argument that, given the interaction among these factors, land managers’ efforts to control wildfires will always be somewhat ineffective
(C) an attempt to provide a clearer understanding of why forest fires have become unnaturally devastating
(D) an argument that specific fuel types and forest densities are dependent on topographic and weather conditions
(E) the suggestion that fires started by lightning will continue to be a factor in wildfire suppression efforts

5 
 5. The passage provides the most support for inferring that which one of the following is true of ancient ponderosa forests?

(A) Ponderosas that thrived in these forests probably differed genetically from modern ponderosas in subtle, though significant, ways.
(B) The population density of trees in these forests was generally lower than it is in many ponderosa forests today.
(C) Weather patterns in these forests were substantially different from weather patterns in ponderosa forests today.
(D) The diversity of plant species was greater in these forests than it is in ponderosa forests today.
(E) In addition to clearing out excess fuel, periodic low-intensity fires helped to control wildlife populations in these forests.

6 
 6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to regard a policy in which all forest fires that were started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally as

(A) a viable means of restoring forests currently vulnerable to catastrophic fires to a cycle of periodic low-intensity fires
(B) an essential component of a new wildfire management plan that would also involve the regulation of timber harvests
(C) beneficial to forests that have centuries-old trees, though harmful to younger forests
(D) currently too extreme and likely to cause the destruction land managers are seeking to avoid
(E) politically infeasible given the public perception of the consequences of such fires

RC Butler 2023  -  Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.   
Passage # 11 Date: 08-Feb-2023
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2023 .  Click here for Details

Source:   LSAT Official PrepTest 72   
 Difficulty Level:   650

desertEagle · Answer

3. Which one of the following sentences would most logically complete the last paragraph of the passage?

(A) However, if homes were not built in such close proximity to forests, the damage to developed property would be limited substantially - talks about homes built in proximity and developed property, which are not discussed in passage - INCORRECT

(B) Unfortunately, until foresters recognize the dangers posed by excess fuel in forests, these proposals are likely to meet with resistance in the forestry community. - Forestry community - Not talked about in passage - INCORRECT

(C) But even with these policies, which require some years to achieve their intended effects, large, devastating fires will remain a threat in the near term.

(D) Yet, because smaller trees will likely yield less profit for timber companies, the ecological benefits of the new plans must be weighed carefully against their economic impact. - Profit, economic impact - Not Talked about in passage - INCORRECT

(E) But given the large financial resources needed to operate a prescribed fire management system, the chances of such policies being implemented are quite small. - Financial resources - Not talked about in passage - INCORRECT

by process of elimination 
Ans C

desertEagle · Answer

6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to regard a policy in which all forest fires that were started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally as

(A) a viable means of restoring forests currently vulnerable to catastrophic fires to a cycle of periodic low-intensity fires
(B) an essential component of a new wildfire management plan that would also involve the regulation of timber harvests
(C) beneficial to forests that have centuries-old trees, though harmful to younger forests
(D) currently too extreme and likely to cause the destruction land managers are seeking to avoid
(E) politically infeasible given the public perception of the consequences of such fires

Because of the relative success
of fire-suppression efforts, many forests, including
ponderosa forests, have now been free of fire for
(30) 50 years or longer,  leaving them vulnerable to these
devastating crown fires.  It is therefore increasingly
necessary for land managers in North America to
strive to manage rather than eliminate fires land
management policies should recognize the essential
(35) role that fire plays in many ecosystems.

If they let it burn right now, there will be great devastation which will kill wildlife and destroys century old trees as fires will reach their crowns

Ans D

Anshuman22mishra · Answer

please explain question 1 with the proper reason

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Here's question 1.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

We see that, to answer this question, we need to identify the primary purpose of the passage.

The passage begins by presenting the facts that "In the last half-century, firefighters in North America have developed a powerful system for fighting wildfires using modern technology," and that "at the same time, foresters and ecologists are increasingly aware that too much firefighting can be worse than none at all."

The first and second paragraphs then explain why "too much firefighting can be worse than none at all."

The second paragraph ends with a conclusion: "It is therefore increasingly necessary for land managers in North America to strive to manage rather than eliminate fires land management policies should recognize the essential role that fire plays in many ecosystems."

Then the third paragraph outlines how the recommendations that conclusion involves can be accomplished.

Let's now go to the answer choices.

(A) claim that ideological dogma may be impeding the enactment of a fundamental and necessary policy change

No dogma is mentioned, and nothing is described as impeding the policy change mentioned in the passage.

(B) compare the actual effects that have resulted from two different policies designed to have the same effect

No comparison of effects is made.

(C) contend that a recently implemented policy requires a substantial increase in funding

The author does not argue for an "increase in funding."

(D) recommend a fundamental policy change in light of evidence that current policy has created undesirable conditions

This is exactly what the passage does, recommends a change from "too much firefighting" to the policy of "strive to manage rather than eliminate fires."

(E) argue that two seemingly contradictory goals of a policy are actually compatible in a fundamental way

No "contradictory goals"' are mentioned all the goals mentioned are in line with each other.

The correct answer is (D).

mayankkkk · Answer

A great read, 5/6 correct got 6th wrong but the passage took a lot of time
So can anyone explain Question 6 with proper explanation

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to regard a policy in which all forest fires that were started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally as

Difficulty Level:   700-750

Explanation

The question asks how the author would regard a policy in which all forest fires started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally. The passage states in  line 51  that fires started by lightning could be allowed to burn when the weather is damp enough to reduce the risk of extensive damage. This implies that the author believes extensive damage might occur if the weather were not damp.

A. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to  line 53  of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be a viable means of restoring the forest.

B. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to  line 53  of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be an essential component of a new wildfire management plan.

C. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to  line 53  of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be beneficial to forests with older trees.

D.  Yes.   This answer matches the statement in  line 53  of the passage that fires may cause extensive damage if the weather is not damp.

E. No.  This answer is not supported by the passage. The passage does not discuss public perception of the consequences of fires, and it does not suggest that a solution is politically infeasible.

Answer: D

ca01248 · Answer

can anyone explain Q5?

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

5. The passage provides the most support for inferring that which one of the following is true of ancient ponderosa forests?

Explanation

The question asks which answer is true of ancient ponderosa forests. Ancient ponderosa forests are mentioned in line 9 of the passage. Look for an answer choice that is proved by statements in the passage about the ancient ponderosa forests, likely located within five lines up or down from line Avoid answers that contradict the Bottom Line or include strongly worded language or comparisons that are not supported by statements in the passage.

A. No.  This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss genetic differences between ancient and modern ponderosas.

B.  Yes.   This answer makes a comparison that is supported by the passage. The first paragraph states that ancient ponderosa forests were stable in part because fires maintained open forests and cleared brush and young trees, while the second paragraph states that fuel builds up in modern forests.

C. No.  This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss differences in weather patterns in ponderosa forests.

D. No.  This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss differences in diversity of plant species in ponderosa forests.

E. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. The second paragraph states that wildlife might escape low-intensity fires, and the passage does not state that fires helped control wildlife populations.

Answer: B

Bhartendukumar · Answer

please provide explanation for the second question

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

2. By “maintenance burns” (line 55) the author most clearly refers to

Explanation

The question asks what the phrase  “maintenance burns”  in  line 55  refers to. The correct answer should match the meaning of that phrase in context, likely located within five lines of  line 55 . In  lines 51–52 , the passage provides the definition:  “intentional lighting of controlled burns”  and  “allowing fires set by lightning to burn.”

A. No.  This answer does not match the passage. Maintenance burns are controlled burns that the passage recommends as part of a new fire-management system. While they are similar to fires that regularly occurred in ancient forests, they are different in that they are managed and controlled.

B. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to the third paragraph, the goal of maintenance burns is to protect mature (larger, fire-tolerant) trees from destruction.

C. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to the second paragraph, the fires that are likely to occur today would result in total devastation.

D. No.  This answer contradicts the passage. According to the first paragraph, this type of fire typically occurred at intervals between 5 and 25 years.

E.  Yes.   The passage describes maintenance burns in  lines 51– 52  as the intentional lighting of controlled burns as well as allowing fires set by lightning to burn under certain conditions.

Answer: E

agrasan · Answer

Hi experts  DmitryFarber   KarishmaB   GMATNinja   MartyMurray

In question-6, can we also infer option C on the basis of lines 20-24?
 "If fires are kept out of forests, however, deadwood and other fuels build up then, when fire is sparked by lightning or some other cause, what results is a fire so large that it leaves total devastation."

My reasoning was that these line also connect " lightning " with " devastation ". If the fire caused by lightning is allowed to burn forests until they die then it is too extreme and devastation that managers want to avoid.

Please let me know if something is wrong with this.

GMATNinja · Answer

Question 6

The problem is that fires HAVE been kept out of forests: "Because of the relative success of fire-suppression efforts, many forests {...} have now been free of fire for 50 years or longer, leaving them vulnerable to these devastating crown fires."

The fuel has been building up, so a lightning strike could cause a large fire that reaches the crowns of centuries-old trees. Such fires could cause total devastation to forests with centuries-old trees and thus would likely not be beneficial to those trees.

In the last half-century, firefighters in North America have developed

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

In the last half-century, firefighters in North America have developed

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards