Last visit was: 12 May 2025, 02:23 It is currently 12 May 2025, 02:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
44,835
 [13]
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
 [13]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
desertEagle
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Last visit: 08 May 2025
Posts: 566
Own Kudos:
328
 [2]
Given Kudos: 413
Posts: 566
Kudos: 328
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
desertEagle
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Last visit: 08 May 2025
Posts: 566
Own Kudos:
328
 [2]
Given Kudos: 413
Posts: 566
Kudos: 328
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Anshuman22mishra
Joined: 29 Jun 2021
Last visit: 09 Mar 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please explain question 1 with the proper reason
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,477
Own Kudos:
5,455
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,431
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,477
Kudos: 5,455
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anshuman22mishra
please explain question 1 with the proper reason
Here's question 1.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

We see that, to answer this question, we need to identify the primary purpose of the passage.

The passage begins by presenting the facts that "In the last half-century, firefighters in North America have developed a powerful system for fighting wildfires using modern technology," and that "at the same time, foresters and ecologists are increasingly aware that too much firefighting can be worse than none at all."

The first and second paragraphs then explain why "too much firefighting can be worse than none at all."

The second paragraph ends with a conclusion: "It is therefore increasingly necessary for land managers in North America to strive to manage rather than eliminate fires land management policies should recognize the essential role that fire plays in many ecosystems."

Then the third paragraph outlines how the recommendations that conclusion involves can be accomplished.

Let's now go to the answer choices.

(A) claim that ideological dogma may be impeding the enactment of a fundamental and necessary policy change

No dogma is mentioned, and nothing is described as impeding the policy change mentioned in the passage.

(B) compare the actual effects that have resulted from two different policies designed to have the same effect

No comparison of effects is made.

(C) contend that a recently implemented policy requires a substantial increase in funding

The author does not argue for an "increase in funding."

(D) recommend a fundamental policy change in light of evidence that current policy has created undesirable conditions

This is exactly what the passage does, recommends a change from "too much firefighting" to the policy of "strive to manage rather than eliminate fires."

(E) argue that two seemingly contradictory goals of a policy are actually compatible in a fundamental way

No "contradictory goals"' are mentioned all the goals mentioned are in line with each other.

The correct answer is (D).
User avatar
mayankkkk
Joined: 21 Nov 2021
Last visit: 24 Sep 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A great read, 5/6 correct got 6th wrong but the passage took a lot of time
So can anyone explain Question 6 with proper explanation
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
44,835
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mayankkkk
A great read, 5/6 correct got 6th wrong but the passage took a lot of time
So can anyone explain Question 6 with proper explanation

Explanation

6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to regard a policy in which all forest fires that were started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally as

Difficulty Level: 700-750

Explanation

The question asks how the author would regard a policy in which all forest fires started by lightning were allowed to burn until they died out naturally. The passage states in line 51 that fires started by lightning could be allowed to burn when the weather is damp enough to reduce the risk of extensive damage. This implies that the author believes extensive damage might occur if the weather were not damp.

A. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to line 53 of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be a viable means of restoring the forest.

B. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to line 53 of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be an essential component of a new wildfire management plan.

C. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to line 53 of the passage, allowing all fires to burn even when the weather is not damp would risk extensive damage to the forest, and so it would not be beneficial to forests with older trees.

D. Yes. This answer matches the statement in line 53 of the passage that fires may cause extensive damage if the weather is not damp.

E. No. This answer is not supported by the passage. The passage does not discuss public perception of the consequences of fires, and it does not suggest that a solution is politically infeasible.

Answer: D
User avatar
ca01248
Joined: 16 Apr 2023
Last visit: 12 Apr 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can anyone explain Q5?­
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
ca01248
can anyone explain Q5?­
Explanation

­5. The passage provides the most support for inferring that which one of the following is true of ancient ponderosa forests?

Explanation

The question asks which answer is true of ancient ponderosa forests. Ancient ponderosa forests are mentioned in line 9 of the passage. Look for an answer choice that is proved by statements in the passage about the ancient ponderosa forests, likely located within five lines up or down from line Avoid answers that contradict the Bottom Line or include strongly worded language or comparisons that are not supported by statements in the passage.

A. No. This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss genetic differences between ancient and modern ponderosas.

B. Yes. This answer makes a comparison that is supported by the passage. The first paragraph states that ancient ponderosa forests were stable in part because fires maintained open forests and cleared brush and young trees, while the second paragraph states that fuel builds up in modern forests.

C. No. This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss differences in weather patterns in ponderosa forests.

D. No. This answer makes an unsupported comparison. The passage does not discuss differences in diversity of plant species in ponderosa forests.

E. No. This answer contradicts the passage. The second paragraph states that wildlife might escape low-intensity fires, and the passage does not state that fires helped control wildlife populations.

Answer: B
­
User avatar
Bhartendukumar
Joined: 26 Feb 2024
Last visit: 02 May 2024
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please provide explanation for the second question
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bhartendukumar
please provide explanation for the second question
Explanation

­2. By “maintenance burns” (line 55) the author most clearly refers to

Explanation

The question asks what the phrase “maintenance burns” in line 55 refers to. The correct answer should match the meaning of that phrase in context, likely located within five lines of line 55. In lines 51–52, the passage provides the definition: “intentional lighting of controlled burns” and “allowing fires set by lightning to burn.”

A. No. This answer does not match the passage. Maintenance burns are controlled burns that the passage recommends as part of a new fire-management system. While they are similar to fires that regularly occurred in ancient forests, they are different in that they are managed and controlled.

B. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to the third paragraph, the goal of maintenance burns is to protect mature (larger, fire-tolerant) trees from destruction.

C. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to the second paragraph, the fires that are likely to occur today would result in total devastation.

D. No. This answer contradicts the passage. According to the first paragraph, this type of fire typically occurred at intervals between 5 and 25 years.

E. Yes. The passage describes maintenance burns in lines 51– 52 as the intentional lighting of controlled burns as well as allowing fires set by lightning to burn under certain conditions.

Answer: E
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,291
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,291
Kudos: 936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7302 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15065 posts