Hovkial
In the last year, biologists have learned that there are many more species of amphibians in existence than had previously been known. This definitely undermines environmentalists' claim that pollution is eliminating many of these species every year.
The reasoning in the argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it involves a confusion between
(A) kinds of things and the things that are of those kinds
(B) a condition necessary for a phenomenon and one that is sufficient for it
(C) a cause and an effect
(D) a correlation between two phenomena and a causal relationship between them
(E) changes in our knowledge of objects and changes in the objects themselves
Hello guys!
The question seemed moderate.
Eliminate
Option A, this can be a holistic approach towards it. Doesn't specify the concern here.
Eliminate
Option B, this is not a condition first of all. Drop this.
Eliminate
Option C, it might seem like its a cause and effect relationship. But it turns out that it takes place,
When X occurs, so Y fails to occur. We do not experience any such scenario here.
Option D, could be a close one here. Let's look at other options.
Option E is on point. 'Changes in our knowledge and changes of objects themselves' takes place, we can very well relate to such a scenario here.
Official Answer:-
Option EThank you!
Regards,
Raunak Damle