Last visit was: 14 Jul 2024, 07:05 It is currently 14 Jul 2024, 07:05
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Franklin Ro

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14060
Own Kudos [?]: 36402 [2]
Given Kudos: 5828
GPA: 3.62
SVP
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 1696
Own Kudos [?]: 1492 [0]
Given Kudos: 639
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94342
Own Kudos [?]: 640698 [0]
Given Kudos: 85011
Tutor
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 754 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Re: In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Franklin Ro [#permalink]
In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Franklin Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act has a good chance of succeeding due to its strong bipartisan support, sound fiscal plan, and widespread electoral approval.

A. Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act has
B. Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
C. Roosevelt’s have argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
D. Roosevelt argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
E. Roosevelt had argued that his proposed Social Security Act has

In the first phrase, we get a great clue about what time period these colleagues lived: the "latter years of the Great Depression." This is obviously in the PAST, so we need the action that the colleagues did to be a past tense verb. Answer choice (C) is present perfect tense (used to describe something that started in the past and CONTINUE to the present. But these colleagues are dead now, so how can they still be arguing?) In (E) we have Past Perfect, which is a kind of past tense, BUT we only use this tense to describe an event that occurred before a Simple Past Tense event. In (E), "has" is not past tense, and even if it were, the meaning wouldn't make sense. The colleagues didn't argue BEFORE the Social Security Act had a chance of success.

So, now we know it has to be (A), (B), or (D). Since (A) also uses the word "has" and we discussed this in (E), we can eliminate this, too.

Let's focus on the differences of the Final Two:

(B) In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act had a good chance of succeeding due to its strong bipartisan support, sound fiscal plan, and widespread electoral approval.

(D) In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Roosevelt argued that his proposed Social Security Act had a good chance of succeeding due to its strong bipartisan support, sound fiscal plan, and widespread electoral approval.

Wow! Only one difference. So what do we know about the use of possessives? When a noun turns into a possessive, it becomes a modifier.

EX: Jill won the soccer game.
Meaning: Jill is the one who won.

EX: Jill's team won the soccer game.
Meaning: The TEAM won, and "Jill's" just describes the team.

So in (B), if "Roosevelt's" is now a modifier, the question becomes, what is it modifying? The only logical option is "colleagues." So the meaning of (B) is "colleagues of Roosevelt's colleagues." Um...what? That's redundant.

Tutor
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 754 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Re: In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Franklin Ro [#permalink]
1
Kudos
stne wrote:
In the latter years of the Great Depression, colleagues of Franklin Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act has a good chance of succeeding due to its strong bipartisan support, sound fiscal plan, and widespread electoral approval.

A. Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act has
B. Roosevelt’s argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
C. Roosevelt’s have argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
D. Roosevelt argued that his proposed Social Security Act had
E. Roosevelt had argued that his proposed Social Security Act has

proposed social security has vs proposed social security had
which is the former wrong?

Are we expected to know American history? Do we need to know that The great depression happened after Franklin's tenure, hence we need to use PAST PERFECT.
What am I missing ?
I understand " Argued " being in the simple past tense is the clue here.

Is the sentence below wrong?

We argued yesterday that the proposed law has a high chance of success.

This sentence simply means that we were arguing yesterday about a law which has been proposed but not yet been implemented.