GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Nov 2019, 01:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2011
Posts: 49
In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2011, 21:06
2
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:51) correct 40% (02:19) wrong based on 509 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic downturn have been felt in all corners of the economy. For example, data from the Crescent City furniture industry show that sales have decreased 12% compared to two years ago. Yet the banks who provide working capital to the furniture retailers report that, in the first year of the downturn, the proportion of credit they provided to the retailers that was repaid on time dropped sharply, while in the second year it returned to normal levels.
Question
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change in credit repayment reported?

A)The total dollar amount of the loans decreased slightly between the first year and the second.
B)New restrictions on the banking industry instituted since the economic downturn began have limited the number of loans banks can make to troubled borrowers.
C)The largest furniture chain in Crescent City slashed prices in the second year in order to stimulate sales.
D)Almost all of the most financially troubled furniture retailers went out of business at the end of the first year of the economic downturn.
E)Between the first and second years of the recession, wholesalers were forced to significantly raise the prices they charged to retailers.

Source: Grockit
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 300
Location: Texas
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2011, 15:10
my answer was C. Not sure how the OA is D. if retailers went out of business at the end of the 1st year, how did they repay in 2nd year...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 157
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '15, Duke '15
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2011, 15:28
i had to choose between b and d. finally went for b because that was similar to the reason i had thought of before reading the answer choices.

from the question: Sales went down. Loan defaults went up the 1st year but was normal the 2nd year.

Possible reason: banks were more careful in lending money and lent to only clients who could pay back for sure.

while D might also be a possible reason, B sounds more sufficiently convincing to me. IMO, all financially troubled retailers need not go out of business for default rates to go down. It is sufficient that such retailer are not lent any money for default rates to be normal.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Preparing for GMAT !!!
Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Posts: 104
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2011, 11:44
2
I chose D. Since the most troubled retailers went out of business after 1st year, the remaining retailers had greater market, which in turn results in a better business for them. That is the only way they could pay in 2nd year, IMO.
_________________
If you like my post, consider giving me Kudos !!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 165
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2011, 14:13
The stimulus mentions that the effects of the downturn have been felt in "all corners" of the economy.

So -- D -- I'm not entirely convinced.

D would have been OK if not for the opening sentence.

B seems right --- because if the banks now only gave loans to "proper" businesses -- there is a much better chance of getting proper payments....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 77
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2011, 02:21
2
From my understanding the restrictions instituted since the economic downturn began i.e they are applicable for both years. Hence we can eliminate B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2011
Posts: 21
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.53
WE: Other (Accounting)
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 09:29
I was hesitated between B and D, and finally chose B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 169
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Northwestern (Kellogg) - Class of 2014
WE: Marketing (Computer Hardware)
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2011, 12:28
toughmat wrote:
From my understanding the restrictions instituted since the economic downturn began i.e they are applicable for both years. Hence we can eliminate B



I agree, that was the tricky part of the question. The restrictions wouldn't explain why they weren't able to pay the first year.

The answer is D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Applying for 2012 B school admissions
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 109
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.6
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2011, 22:30
1
1
+1 D

I had done a similar question before with almost the same answer choices, so this one was easy for me. Also this question is tagged as "must be true", but I think it is a "resolve a paradox" type of question. The correct answer choices of "must be true" questions cannot bring in new information and are in most of the cases a simple paraphrase of one or more of the premises themselves.

Paradox in the Argument: Proportion of loan repaid dropped sharply in the first year, but returned to normal levels in the second year.

Correct answer choice will resolve the paradox by explaining the "but" in the argument.

guygmat wrote:

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change in credit repayment reported?

A)The total dollar amount of the loans decreased slightly between the first year and the second.
irrelevant-doesn't explain why the proportion of loans repaid returned to normal levels, total amount of loans may have dropped and the proportion of loans returned may still have remained the same.

B)New restrictions on the banking industry instituted since the economic downturn began have limited the number of loans banks can make to troubled borrowers.
if you followed why Option A is wrong, this option can easily be seen as irrelevant, and because of the same reasons. Even if the total amount of loans dropped, the proportion of loans repaid could remain the same. An increase or decrease in number doesn't guarantee a similar increase or decrease in proportion (or percentage). If, however, this option stated that banks are diverting loans from troubled retailers to well-off retailers, then this option might have been a contender.

C)The largest furniture chain in Crescent City slashed prices in the second year in order to stimulate sales.
out of scope, we are talking about all furniture retailers, not just one or the biggest player. Also we do not know whether the stimulated sales were sufficient to repay the loans

D)Almost all of the most financially troubled furniture retailers went out of business at the end of the first year of the economic downturn.
correct, if most of the troubled retailers who had difficulty in repaying loans went out of business at the end of the first year, in the second year only those those retailers remained who could repay the loans, thus increasing the proportion of loans repaid and explaining the paradox

E)Between the first and second years of the recession, wholesalers were forced to significantly raise the prices they charged to retailers.
irrelevant, we are concerned about retailers and not wholesalers. And also if this option were true, retailers would be left more troubled by the rise in prices, thus making the paradox more grave.

_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Applying for 2012 B school admissions
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 109
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.6
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2011, 22:33
yup, an easy point I missed out. Eliminates B straightforward. Kudos to you for reminding me about this type of wrong answer choice :wink: .

toughmat wrote:
From my understanding the restrictions instituted since the economic downturn began i.e they are applicable for both years. Hence we can eliminate B

_________________
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: want to get 720+in GMAT
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 26
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2011, 10:55
+1 for D...although my answer was E......but D wins
_________________
Aim 720+
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 39
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2011, 05:27
This is a strengthen question !!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 44
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2011, 18:46
I'm not convinced with D. But of all the given choices D seems correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 127
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2011, 12:27
Izvos wrote:
doubting btw b and d



definately D

B)New restrictions on the banking industry instituted since the economic downturn began have limited the number of loans banks can make to troubled borrowers.

but this does not explain why 1st year has more number of defaulters and how suddenly for the second yr the number decreased.
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: My Thread Master Bschool Threads-->Krannert(Purdue),WP Carey(Arizona),Foster(Uwashngton)
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 810
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Must Be True CR  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2011, 13:45
2
diffcult ques
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 92
GPA: 3.5
Re: In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2012, 23:07
D it is.
If the financially struggling furniture retailers were in business in the first year then the payments will be late to the bank and if they are out of business in the second year and the remaining furniture retailers who are not struggling financially will pay on time that will result in the turnaround in the bank report.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 38
Reviews Badge
Re: In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2014, 03:16
Chose E but surely D is the correct answer choice....
_________________
'The best way to thank or appreciate efforts on this forum is to give Kudos.'
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 31
Re: In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2018, 22:29
D is correct. Because, if most of the troubled retailers went out from business after first year then in second year remained retailers got more market share to sell their products. Eventually, they can generate enough money to repay their loans.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 67
CAT Tests
In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2018, 00:01
I can see a lot of people supporting B here ..but D is the clear winner here for following reasons ..

Passage talks about the Proportion of credit repaid returned to normal value in the 2nd year ..please note we are talking about proportion ..i.e percentage or the ratio ...
Decreasing the total number of credit given will not help in any way unless we are not sure reduction of credit is mostly in the bad credit or in cases where repayment were not going to happen ..hence B is eliminated ..

D clearly tells us ..Almost all of the most financially troubled furniture retailers went out of business at the end of the first year of the economic downturn.
Hence we are sure reduction in number of financially troubled retailers must have helped to improve the proportion in the 2nd year

Hence D .
Hope it helps
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 6737
Re: In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2019, 00:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic   [#permalink] 20 Oct 2019, 00:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne