It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 03:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the years since the city of London imposed strict

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
In the years since the city of London imposed strict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 08:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

54% (01:12) correct 46% (01:47) wrong based on 17 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 361

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Location: London
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 08:21
it's not c, d, e

so either A or B.

A says entirely which seems to be an exaggeration.
but B is about the quality of air.

I would guess B.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 717

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 08:42
why not E?

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 10:02
A should be the answer

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 10:12
E

How can E be an assumption?

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 10:49
riteshgupta1 wrote:
why not E?


Here's why E is an assupmtion of the argument. We're looking for a statement that is not an assumption in this question.

(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
- This statement is nescessary to support the argument that air pollution regulations are effective

(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
- THis statement is needed to support the plan to implement the same regulations in other parts of the world

(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
- This statement is needed to support that the air pollution measures put in place to increase the number of bird species is desirable

(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
- This statement is needed to support the author's comment that the number of species has increased

In fact, A is the only one that does not have any real use to the argument.

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
- With this statement, nothing in the argument is supported for.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

GMAT ToolKit User
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 11:14
E it is.

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 478

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 12:33
IMO E it is....
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angeles
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 12:45
I think the answer should be A because it nullifies the argument.

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 16:42
I think its E.

A has to be an assumption since it is saying the rise of bird species is related to less pollution, which in turn is related to control of regulated pollution output from local industries. If OTHER industries were causing pollution too, then the birds probably would not have been sighted(since it dosn't mention anything about reducing pollution for OTHER industries), hence A stands.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2005, 22:12
E it is.

Birds increased due to reduced pollution. If this is the underlying assumption, then A is one of the assumptions becasue if there are other industries and they are still polluting, then the birds would not have icreased!
Pollution is pollution whether they are from local industries or other industries.

Good one! Where are these CRs from by the way? Any specific collection? OG CR is just average! Any other good source to practice guys?
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2005, 01:03
OA is A.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2005, 01:04
We're looking for a statement that is not an assumption needed for the argument to stand. A is the only one that has no real use around here.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 03 Sep 2005, 01:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the years since the city of London imposed strict

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.